Anonymous wrote:There are a few fields that use "prestigious" schools as an efficient way to weed out applicants - finance, big law, consulting, often academia. It seems a little antiquated these days, not least because the Harvards and Yales are not necessarily getting the best and brightest anymore. But as long as a few schools continue to be perceived as more prestigious, there will be certain companies and industries that will prefer those students rather than objectively more talented students from say Maryland or Wisconsin.The Blackstones and KKRs of the world still feel they have a good talent pool to choose from with the limited number of schools they target for recruitment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Look at bios of successful people in the field you are interested in. It will give you an idea. I know CEOs and very rich people from unremarkable schools. But if you are not able to figure out how to make it on your own and need to be at Goldman Sachs or something, then yes, it will matter.
I would say in the past it has not mattered much except in a few fields. That may change with this obsession with prestige we have going. Maybe not once people figure out many of these kids are not special and just cheated their way to 4.0.
Even at Goldman Sachs, there's a spread of schools. Just look at their leadership:
David Solomon, Chairman & CEO: Hamilton College (undergraduate)
John Waldron, President & COO: Middlebury College (undergraduate)
Robert Kaplan, Vice Chairman: University of Kansas, Lawrence (undergraduate) + Harvard Business School (MBA)
Ashok Varadhan, Co-Head of Global Banking & Markets: Duke (undergraduate) + Stanford (PhD)
Dan Dees, Co-Head of Global Banking & Markets: Duke (undergraduate)
Marc Nachmann, Co-Head of Global Wealth Management: Wesleyan (undergraduate) + Harvard Business School (MBA)
Tucker York, Co-Head of Global Wealth Management: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (undergraduate) + Harvard Business School (MBA)
All of these individuals are worth hundreds of millions of dollars, and they had a range of education journeys. Of course you see degrees from Harvard, Duke, and Stanford, but the top 2 executives didn't need that.
Anonymous wrote:Title says it, but if I hear things like "My kid didn't go to an ivy and he turned out fine, he went to Duke undergrad and Stanford for an MBA." OBVIOUSLY that doesn't count if you're including two very prestigious schools that are better than most of the ivy league. I'm talking about going to regular schools (not top privates or flagship state schools) and having a great career. Thanks!
Anonymous wrote:Title says it, but if I hear things like "My kid didn't go to an ivy and he turned out fine, he went to Duke undergrad and Stanford for an MBA." OBVIOUSLY that doesn't count if you're including two very prestigious schools that are better than most of the ivy league. I'm talking about going to regular schools (not top privates or flagship state schools) and having a great career. Thanks!
Anonymous wrote:Normally, I would say no...but since OP is incapable of even looking at the exact same thread on this first page (or the weekly threads on this topic)...today I will say absolutely yes.
OP, if your kid can't get into a top 5 school, then you might as well sign them up for SNAP and Medicaid now.
Anonymous wrote:Someone beating the same drum in different posts. Boring.
Anonymous wrote:Title says it, but if I hear things like "My kid didn't go to an ivy and he turned out fine, he went to Duke undergrad and Stanford for an MBA." OBVIOUSLY that doesn't count if you're including two very prestigious schools that are better than most of the ivy league. I'm talking about going to regular schools (not top privates or flagship state schools) and having a great career. Thanks!
Anonymous wrote:Let me lay this out really simply. There is a very very limited subset of careers where going to an ivy might credible help set up for long term success. Like being elected president of the United States.
There are a subset of careers where it can help in the short term but that bump may or may not last over time AND an ivy isn’t the only pathway to success, for example certain business fields.
There is an exceptionally large subset of jobs and careers where it simply does not matter. An elementary school teacher doesn’t need to go to an Ivy. Same with a physical therapist. Same with an accountant. Etc ad nauseum for 98% of actual jobs.
If you have never met someone with a successful career who didn’t go to a top school I have to seriously wonder if you exist in the same world as the rest of us.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Look at bios of successful people in the field you are interested in. It will give you an idea. I know CEOs and very rich people from unremarkable schools. But if you are not able to figure out how to make it on your own and need to be at Goldman Sachs or something, then yes, it will matter.
I would say in the past it has not mattered much except in a few fields. That may change with this obsession with prestige we have going. Maybe not once people figure out many of these kids are not special and just cheated their way to 4.0.
Even at Goldman Sachs, there's a spread of schools. Just look at their leadership:
David Solomon, Chairman & CEO: Hamilton College (undergraduate)
John Waldron, President & COO: Middlebury College (undergraduate)
Robert Kaplan, Vice Chairman: University of Kansas, Lawrence (undergraduate) + Harvard Business School (MBA)
Ashok Varadhan, Co-Head of Global Banking & Markets: Duke (undergraduate) + Stanford (PhD)
Dan Dees, Co-Head of Global Banking & Markets: Duke (undergraduate)
Marc Nachmann, Co-Head of Global Wealth Management: Wesleyan (undergraduate) + Harvard Business School (MBA)
Tucker York, Co-Head of Global Wealth Management: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (undergraduate) + Harvard Business School (MBA)
All of these individuals are worth hundreds of millions of dollars, and they had a range of education journeys. Of course you see degrees from Harvard, Duke, and Stanford, but the top 2 executives didn't need that.
Anonymous wrote:Look at bios of successful people in the field you are interested in. It will give you an idea. I know CEOs and very rich people from unremarkable schools. But if you are not able to figure out how to make it on your own and need to be at Goldman Sachs or something, then yes, it will matter.
I would say in the past it has not mattered much except in a few fields. That may change with this obsession with prestige we have going. Maybe not once people figure out many of these kids are not special and just cheated their way to 4.0.