Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Space wise it’s hard to beat without getting full size (suburban type) car
It’s only a little bit bigger than a pilot cargo wise, yet only seats 7 passengers vs a pilots 8. I guess if you are carrying 6 kids and hockey gear that’s the priority?
Seven is with second row captain’s chairs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s cheap
This is it — there’s a group of people out there who choose the Atlas:
A) Do no research on reliability
B) Want something big ‘n cheap
C) like that it’s an SUV and not a minivan
D) For some, they toss away their cars for low trade-in values every handful of years
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Space wise it’s hard to beat without getting full size (suburban type) car
It’s only a little bit bigger than a pilot cargo wise, yet only seats 7 passengers vs a pilots 8. I guess if you are carrying 6 kids and hockey gear that’s the priority?
Anonymous wrote:My SIL just got this car, and I am curious why someone would get this over a Highlander or Ascent (she has a Subaru now in fact). Consumer reports hates the car. Is it especially great to drive? Trendy?
Anonymous wrote:It’s cheap
Anonymous wrote:So unreliable. Only good if you replace cars often which is a waste of money. I agree that Atlas has a weird social media following if you aren’t getting a Tahoe, which people are also obsessed with.
Then again I am a minivan loyalist so clearly vanity is not a concern of mine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My SIL just got this car, and I am curious why someone would get this over a Highlander or Ascent (she has a Subaru now in fact). Consumer reports hates the car. Is it especially great to drive? Trendy?
Consumer Reports hates Jeeps as well, but Jeep owners keep buying Jeeps.
Among the Highlander, the Ascent, and the VW Atlas, I find the Atlas most attractive--but, it is the only one that I didn't test drive.