Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My freshman kid is at a SLAC and one reason they chose it is for the small class sizes. In my opinion (and personal experience), there is a significant difference between a 40-50 person class and a class of 100-300. My kid had one class with around 40 students this year - that was their largest class, but the professor still knew them all, called on them by name, had lots of class participation, and was able to give very detailed feedback to them. No TAs ran labs or study sessions or did any grading. When grades were posted, the prof wrote each of the students an email about their performance in the class and her thoughts about other courses they might like in the department, and for some of them, that she hoped they considering majoring in the department. She also suggested research and summer opportunities to some of them. As for other classes, my kid's smallest class was 12 students - next semester they will have an even smaller class. And it's not just the relationships with the professors, your interaction with peers is also very different when there are 12 of you, or even 40 of you, versus 300 of you. It's personal preference of course but obviously there is a big difference.
Everything you just described has been my kid's experience at a large state school. She's on a first-name basis with most of her professors, several of whom have written deeply personal recommendation letters for her. She's also never had a TA in the classroom at all, and certainly no classes larger than an intro of about 150. Since then, her classes average around 30 people, more or less.
Anonymous wrote:A lecture vs a seminar are completely different experiences. My child wanted schools where she could access discussion based classes as much as possible. But I agree with you that a 50 person lecture is not that different from a 200 person lecture.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Try to get as many seminar classes as possible. They're more valuable.
False. The large lectures give you access to the famous and gifted lecturers son the faculty. My DS had Ken Elzinga for Micro amd macro econ his first year at UVA. Elzinga became a mentor and wrote LORs long after DS went into politics seminars. I. sharp contrast, the faculty at my SLAC were unknowns in their fields outside of my SLAC and my LORs hurt me as a result.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A 500 person class is basically YouTube.
What school has a 500 person class?
Haha. Lots of schools! I was in a class my first year at Harvard with about 900.
That sounds miserable.
Anonymous wrote:I notice that many college rankings consider class size.
As an adult, why do you need to be sitting in a tiny classroom to learn?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Try to get as many seminar classes as possible. They're more valuable.
False. The large lectures give you access to the famous and gifted lecturers son the faculty. My DS had Ken Elzinga for Micro amd macro econ his first year at UVA. Elzinga became a mentor and wrote LORs long after DS went into politics seminars. I. sharp contrast, the faculty at my SLAC were unknowns in their fields outside of my SLAC and my LORs hurt me as a result.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A 500 person class is basically YouTube.
What school has a 500 person class?
Anonymous wrote:A lecture vs a seminar are completely different experiences. My child wanted schools where she could access discussion based classes as much as possible. But I agree with you that a 50 person lecture is not that different from a 200 person lecture.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My freshman kid is at a SLAC and one reason they chose it is for the small class sizes. In my opinion (and personal experience), there is a significant difference between a 40-50 person class and a class of 100-300. My kid had one class with around 40 students this year - that was their largest class, but the professor still knew them all, called on them by name, had lots of class participation, and was able to give very detailed feedback to them. No TAs ran labs or study sessions or did any grading. When grades were posted, the prof wrote each of the students an email about their performance in the class and her thoughts about other courses they might like in the department, and for some of them, that she hoped they considering majoring in the department. She also suggested research and summer opportunities to some of them. As for other classes, my kid's smallest class was 12 students - next semester they will have an even smaller class. And it's not just the relationships with the professors, your interaction with peers is also very different when there are 12 of you, or even 40 of you, versus 300 of you. It's personal preference of course but obviously there is a big difference.
Everything you just described has been my kid's experience at a large state school. She's on a first-name basis with most of her professors, several of whom have written deeply personal recommendation letters for her. She's also never had a TA in the classroom at all, and certainly no classes larger than an intro of about 150. Since then, her classes average around 30 people, more or less.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A 500 person class is basically YouTube.
What school has a 500 person class?
Haha. Lots of schools! I was in a class my first year at Harvard with about 900.