Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This can’t be a true story when 11yos are involved. If true, your friend is way out of line. There are nuts in the world and an 11 yo is old enough to navigate that.
OP here. It is true, but not difficult to understand if you know my friend. She’s very much a helicopter parent and there’s a lot of codependence and micromanaging. Still, she trusted me enough to remember something important, and I blew it.
Gee, do you think she’s micromanaging and helicopter-y because a lot of adults like you have “blown it” and act like it’s a “goof”?
Did helicopter mom tell OP that her house must be entirely nut free in order for her son to be there? That's an impossible standard for a house that isn't already nut free.
That’s not what it’s about. It’s very hard on a kid when a trusted adult or a grandparent/aunt/whomever—who has known about the allergy for years—“goofs.” It makes them feel unsafe with someone they are supposed to trust.
What is the rule that is supposed to followed exactly? What should everyone do to make it safe for a kid with a nut allergy to attend a party?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And the kid ate candy because there were nut-free, wrapped options.
If they were all mixed together in a bowl by a trusted adult, that’s a problem. Not a problem that OP should have gotten yelled at about, but still.
Why are wrapped candies in a bowl a problem?
Because when it’s a trusted adult, the kid probably feels like oh yay candy and might not be paying very close attention. Might not be putting together that some of them (not Snickers, but some of the “May Contain” ones) are unsafe. And then realizing is kind of scary when it’s a trusted adult or a grandparent who forgets.
Even the 11 yr isn't that dense. "Well it's Peanut M&Ms, but Mrs. OP is a trusted adult so must be ok in this case!" Said no 11yo nut allergy kid.
Except not all of them are obvious. Tell me without looking: Does a Kit-Kat contain or may contain peanuts or tree nuts? Do plain M&Ms contain or may contain peanuts or tree nuts? Milky Way? Three Musketeers? Whoppers?
This kid KNEW. He's the one with the allergy and needs to know. That's the point. Everyone else can't be trusted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This can’t be a true story when 11yos are involved. If true, your friend is way out of line. There are nuts in the world and an 11 yo is old enough to navigate that.
OP here. It is true, but not difficult to understand if you know my friend. She’s very much a helicopter parent and there’s a lot of codependence and micromanaging. Still, she trusted me enough to remember something important, and I blew it.
Gee, do you think she’s micromanaging and helicopter-y because a lot of adults like you have “blown it” and act like it’s a “goof”?
Did helicopter mom tell OP that her house must be entirely nut free in order for her son to be there? That's an impossible standard for a house that isn't already nut free.
That’s not what it’s about. It’s very hard on a kid when a trusted adult or a grandparent/aunt/whomever—who has known about the allergy for years—“goofs.” It makes them feel unsafe with someone they are supposed to trust.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And the kid ate candy because there were nut-free, wrapped options.
If they were all mixed together in a bowl by a trusted adult, that’s a problem. Not a problem that OP should have gotten yelled at about, but still.
Why are wrapped candies in a bowl a problem?
Because when it’s a trusted adult, the kid probably feels like oh yay candy and might not be paying very close attention. Might not be putting together that some of them (not Snickers, but some of the “May Contain” ones) are unsafe. And then realizing is kind of scary when it’s a trusted adult or a grandparent who forgets.
Even the 11 yr isn't that dense. "Well it's Peanut M&Ms, but Mrs. OP is a trusted adult so must be ok in this case!" Said no 11yo nut allergy kid.
Except not all of them are obvious. Tell me without looking: Does a Kit-Kat contain or may contain peanuts or tree nuts? Do plain M&Ms contain or may contain peanuts or tree nuts? Milky Way? Three Musketeers? Whoppers?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And the kid ate candy because there were nut-free, wrapped options.
If they were all mixed together in a bowl by a trusted adult, that’s a problem. Not a problem that OP should have gotten yelled at about, but still.
Why are wrapped candies in a bowl a problem?
Because when it’s a trusted adult, the kid probably feels like oh yay candy and might not be paying very close attention. Might not be putting together that some of them (not Snickers, but some of the “May Contain” ones) are unsafe. And then realizing is kind of scary when it’s a trusted adult or a grandparent who forgets.
Even the 11 yr isn't that dense. "Well it's Peanut M&Ms, but Mrs. OP is a trusted adult so must be ok in this case!" Said no 11yo nut allergy kid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This can’t be a true story when 11yos are involved. If true, your friend is way out of line. There are nuts in the world and an 11 yo is old enough to navigate that.
OP here. It is true, but not difficult to understand if you know my friend. She’s very much a helicopter parent and there’s a lot of codependence and micromanaging. Still, she trusted me enough to remember something important, and I blew it.
Gee, do you think she’s micromanaging and helicopter-y because a lot of adults like you have “blown it” and act like it’s a “goof”?
Did helicopter mom tell OP that her house must be entirely nut free in order for her son to be there? That's an impossible standard for a house that isn't already nut free.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And the kid ate candy because there were nut-free, wrapped options.
If they were all mixed together in a bowl by a trusted adult, that’s a problem. Not a problem that OP should have gotten yelled at about, but still.
Why are wrapped candies in a bowl a problem?
Because when it’s a trusted adult, the kid probably feels like oh yay candy and might not be paying very close attention. Might not be putting together that some of them (not Snickers, but some of the “May Contain” ones) are unsafe. And then realizing is kind of scary when it’s a trusted adult or a grandparent who forgets.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This can’t be a true story when 11yos are involved. If true, your friend is way out of line. There are nuts in the world and an 11 yo is old enough to navigate that.
OP here. It is true, but not difficult to understand if you know my friend. She’s very much a helicopter parent and there’s a lot of codependence and micromanaging. Still, she trusted me enough to remember something important, and I blew it.
Gee, do you think she’s micromanaging and helicopter-y because a lot of adults like you have “blown it” and act like it’s a “goof”?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And the kid ate candy because there were nut-free, wrapped options.
If they were all mixed together in a bowl by a trusted adult, that’s a problem. Not a problem that OP should have gotten yelled at about, but still.
Why are wrapped candies in a bowl a problem?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And the kid ate candy because there were nut-free, wrapped options.
If they were all mixed together in a bowl by a trusted adult, that’s a problem. Not a problem that OP should have gotten yelled at about, but still.
Anonymous wrote:This can’t be a true story when 11yos are involved. If true, your friend is way out of line. There are nuts in the world and an 11 yo is old enough to navigate that.