Anonymous wrote:CM drop - and VT’s equivalent rise - is because the 2023 USN rankings changed significantly
The 2023 rankings emphasize graduate salaries, first-generation student enrollment and graduation and faculty research productivity, while no longer incorporating alumni giving rate, class size, the high school class standing of new entrants, the proportion of graduates with debt and the proportion of faculty with terminal degrees.
Those changes reflect general concerns about the cost v benefit of education and the professionalization of college.
But I don’t think anyone who is getting a LA degree in Germanic languages is going to pick VT over WM because VT is ranked higher.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m not entirely sure what you are asking OP.
Is it this? I’m in VA, and there is a perception here that the current USNWR ranking underrate WM, because they stopped considering the places WM shines, like small classes for a public and undergrad teaching. And that outside of CS/engineering it should rank above VT. WM kids entering stats are almost identical to UVA’s and much higher than VTs, and kids that can easily get into VT Arts and Sciences often cannot get into WM. Really, WM should be evaluated as a LAC because who they are is a mismatch with the ranking criteria. But their law school and a couple other things prevent this.
Also that *for arts & sciences* JMU and VT are close to being peers and kid preference and specific course of study place a big role in a kid deciding which to choose. But, they aren’t ranked against each other at all in USNWR because VT is “national” under USNWR and JMU is “regional”.
So, in general, USNWR does kind of a hatchet job on the top 4-5 VA public colleges because kids consider WM and UVA side by side or VT and JMU, but USNWR ranking are out of whack with what’s happening on the ground.
Agree with everything said here.
JMU is no longer a regional university, though. It is not in the national category and their being ranked below GMU is another example of a huge mismatch between perception/reputation/reality and their methodology.
Your JMU/GMU example (not in VA) was one that prompted me to start this. I had inkling of this but wasn’t sure.
It’s a silly example. No kids’ final two choices are JMU and GMU and they choose GMU because it was ranked higher this year for the first time in 40 years.
That's exactly what PP was saying. This is another example of a mismatch between public perception/school reputation and US News.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m not entirely sure what you are asking OP.
Is it this? I’m in VA, and there is a perception here that the current USNWR ranking underrate WM, because they stopped considering the places WM shines, like small classes for a public and undergrad teaching. And that outside of CS/engineering it should rank above VT. WM kids entering stats are almost identical to UVA’s and much higher than VTs, and kids that can easily get into VT Arts and Sciences often cannot get into WM. Really, WM should be evaluated as a LAC because who they are is a mismatch with the ranking criteria. But their law school and a couple other things prevent this.
Also that *for arts & sciences* JMU and VT are close to being peers and kid preference and specific course of study place a big role in a kid deciding which to choose. But, they aren’t ranked against each other at all in USNWR because VT is “national” under USNWR and JMU is “regional”.
So, in general, USNWR does kind of a hatchet job on the top 4-5 VA public colleges because kids consider WM and UVA side by side or VT and JMU, but USNWR ranking are out of whack with what’s happening on the ground.
Agree with everything said here.
JMU is no longer a regional university, though. It is not in the national category and their being ranked below GMU is another example of a huge mismatch between perception/reputation/reality and their methodology.
Your JMU/GMU example (not in VA) was one that prompted me to start this. I had inkling of this but wasn’t sure.
It’s a silly example. No kids’ final two choices are JMU and GMU and they choose GMU because it was ranked higher this year for the first time in 40 years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m not entirely sure what you are asking OP.
Is it this? I’m in VA, and there is a perception here that the current USNWR ranking underrate WM, because they stopped considering the places WM shines, like small classes for a public and undergrad teaching. And that outside of CS/engineering it should rank above VT. WM kids entering stats are almost identical to UVA’s and much higher than VTs, and kids that can easily get into VT Arts and Sciences often cannot get into WM. Really, WM should be evaluated as a LAC because who they are is a mismatch with the ranking criteria. But their law school and a couple other things prevent this.
Also that *for arts & sciences* JMU and VT are close to being peers and kid preference and specific course of study place a big role in a kid deciding which to choose. But, they aren’t ranked against each other at all in USNWR because VT is “national” under USNWR and JMU is “regional”.
So, in general, USNWR does kind of a hatchet job on the top 4-5 VA public colleges because kids consider WM and UVA side by side or VT and JMU, but USNWR ranking are out of whack with what’s happening on the ground.
Agree with everything said here.
JMU is no longer a regional university, though. It is not in the national category and their being ranked below GMU is another example of a huge mismatch between perception/reputation/reality and their methodology.
Your JMU/GMU example (not in VA) was one that prompted me to start this. I had inkling of this but wasn’t sure.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m not entirely sure what you are asking OP.
Is it this? I’m in VA, and there is a perception here that the current USNWR ranking underrate WM, because they stopped considering the places WM shines, like small classes for a public and undergrad teaching. And that outside of CS/engineering it should rank above VT. WM kids entering stats are almost identical to UVA’s and much higher than VTs, and kids that can easily get into VT Arts and Sciences often cannot get into WM. Really, WM should be evaluated as a LAC because who they are is a mismatch with the ranking criteria. But their law school and a couple other things prevent this.
Also that *for arts & sciences* JMU and VT are close to being peers and kid preference and specific course of study place a big role in a kid deciding which to choose. But, they aren’t ranked against each other at all in USNWR because VT is “national” under USNWR and JMU is “regional”.
So, in general, USNWR does kind of a hatchet job on the top 4-5 VA public colleges because kids consider WM and UVA side by side or VT and JMU, but USNWR ranking are out of whack with what’s happening on the ground.
Agree with everything said here.
JMU is no longer a regional university, though. It is not in the national category and their being ranked below GMU is another example of a huge mismatch between perception/reputation/reality and their methodology.
Your JMU/GMU example (not in VA) was one that prompted me to start this. I had inkling of this but wasn’t sure.
Yes. I think this is because JMU is very often the second choice for people who didn't get into VTech, so their student body is elevated compared to places like GMU or ODU or CNU whose students were potentially rejected from JMU level places in addition to everywhere above it in reputation. JMU is one level in the food chain above.
I think for people applying to JMU their in-state choice list is probably something like:
- UVA (maybe applying just because or not applying at all)
- VTech (probably also peers like penn state)
- JMU
- Everywhere else
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m not entirely sure what you are asking OP.
Is it this? I’m in VA, and there is a perception here that the current USNWR ranking underrate WM, because they stopped considering the places WM shines, like small classes for a public and undergrad teaching. And that outside of CS/engineering it should rank above VT. WM kids entering stats are almost identical to UVA’s and much higher than VTs, and kids that can easily get into VT Arts and Sciences often cannot get into WM. Really, WM should be evaluated as a LAC because who they are is a mismatch with the ranking criteria. But their law school and a couple other things prevent this.
Also that *for arts & sciences* JMU and VT are close to being peers and kid preference and specific course of study place a big role in a kid deciding which to choose. But, they aren’t ranked against each other at all in USNWR because VT is “national” under USNWR and JMU is “regional”.
So, in general, USNWR does kind of a hatchet job on the top 4-5 VA public colleges because kids consider WM and UVA side by side or VT and JMU, but USNWR ranking are out of whack with what’s happening on the ground.
Agree with everything said here.
JMU is no longer a regional university, though. It is not in the national category and their being ranked below GMU is another example of a huge mismatch between perception/reputation/reality and their methodology.
Your JMU/GMU example (not in VA) was one that prompted me to start this. I had inkling of this but wasn’t sure.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m not entirely sure what you are asking OP.
Is it this? I’m in VA, and there is a perception here that the current USNWR ranking underrate WM, because they stopped considering the places WM shines, like small classes for a public and undergrad teaching. And that outside of CS/engineering it should rank above VT. WM kids entering stats are almost identical to UVA’s and much higher than VTs, and kids that can easily get into VT Arts and Sciences often cannot get into WM. Really, WM should be evaluated as a LAC because who they are is a mismatch with the ranking criteria. But their law school and a couple other things prevent this.
Also that *for arts & sciences* JMU and VT are close to being peers and kid preference and specific course of study place a big role in a kid deciding which to choose. But, they aren’t ranked against each other at all in USNWR because VT is “national” under USNWR and JMU is “regional”.
So, in general, USNWR does kind of a hatchet job on the top 4-5 VA public colleges because kids consider WM and UVA side by side or VT and JMU, but USNWR ranking are out of whack with what’s happening on the ground.
Agree with everything said here.
JMU is no longer a regional university, though. It is not in the national category and their being ranked below GMU is another example of a huge mismatch between perception/reputation/reality and their methodology.
But how much of a factor is location in the in state VA perception of JMU being ranked higher than GMU?
IMO, GMU academic reputation seems better than JMU, but of course, most of the educated live in NoVa, and their kids don't want to go to a school that's 15 miles away. But, GMU, being close to DC, has way more opportunities than JMU.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m not entirely sure what you are asking OP.
Is it this? I’m in VA, and there is a perception here that the current USNWR ranking underrate WM, because they stopped considering the places WM shines, like small classes for a public and undergrad teaching. And that outside of CS/engineering it should rank above VT. WM kids entering stats are almost identical to UVA’s and much higher than VTs, and kids that can easily get into VT Arts and Sciences often cannot get into WM. Really, WM should be evaluated as a LAC because who they are is a mismatch with the ranking criteria. But their law school and a couple other things prevent this.
Also that *for arts & sciences* JMU and VT are close to being peers and kid preference and specific course of study place a big role in a kid deciding which to choose. But, they aren’t ranked against each other at all in USNWR because VT is “national” under USNWR and JMU is “regional”.
So, in general, USNWR does kind of a hatchet job on the top 4-5 VA public colleges because kids consider WM and UVA side by side or VT and JMU, but USNWR ranking are out of whack with what’s happening on the ground.
Agree with everything said here.
JMU is no longer a regional university, though. It is not in the national category and their being ranked below GMU is another example of a huge mismatch between perception/reputation/reality and their methodology.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m not entirely sure what you are asking OP.
Is it this? I’m in VA, and there is a perception here that the current USNWR ranking underrate WM, because they stopped considering the places WM shines, like small classes for a public and undergrad teaching. And that outside of CS/engineering it should rank above VT. WM kids entering stats are almost identical to UVA’s and much higher than VTs, and kids that can easily get into VT Arts and Sciences often cannot get into WM. Really, WM should be evaluated as a LAC because who they are is a mismatch with the ranking criteria. But their law school and a couple other things prevent this.
Also that *for arts & sciences* JMU and VT are close to being peers and kid preference and specific course of study place a big role in a kid deciding which to choose. But, they aren’t ranked against each other at all in USNWR because VT is “national” under USNWR and JMU is “regional”.
So, in general, USNWR does kind of a hatchet job on the top 4-5 VA public colleges because kids consider WM and UVA side by side or VT and JMU, but USNWR ranking are out of whack with what’s happening on the ground.
Agree with everything said here.
JMU is no longer a regional university, though. It is not in the national category and their being ranked below GMU is another example of a huge mismatch between perception/reputation/reality and their methodology.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m not entirely sure what you are asking OP.
Is it this? I’m in VA, and there is a perception here that the current USNWR ranking underrate WM, because they stopped considering the places WM shines, like small classes for a public and undergrad teaching. And that outside of CS/engineering it should rank above VT. WM kids entering stats are almost identical to UVA’s and much higher than VTs, and kids that can easily get into VT Arts and Sciences often cannot get into WM. Really, WM should be evaluated as a LAC because who they are is a mismatch with the ranking criteria. But their law school and a couple other things prevent this.
Also that *for arts & sciences* JMU and VT are close to being peers and kid preference and specific course of study place a big role in a kid deciding which to choose. But, they aren’t ranked against each other at all in USNWR because VT is “national” under USNWR and JMU is “regional”.
So, in general, USNWR does kind of a hatchet job on the top 4-5 VA public colleges because kids consider WM and UVA side by side or VT and JMU, but USNWR ranking are out of whack with what’s happening on the ground.
Agree with everything said here.
JMU is no longer a regional university, though. It is not in the national category and their being ranked below GMU is another example of a huge mismatch between perception/reputation/reality and their methodology.
Anonymous wrote:I’m not entirely sure what you are asking OP.
Is it this? I’m in VA, and there is a perception here that the current USNWR ranking underrate WM, because they stopped considering the places WM shines, like small classes for a public and undergrad teaching. And that outside of CS/engineering it should rank above VT. WM kids entering stats are almost identical to UVA’s and much higher than VTs, and kids that can easily get into VT Arts and Sciences often cannot get into WM. Really, WM should be evaluated as a LAC because who they are is a mismatch with the ranking criteria. But their law school and a couple other things prevent this.
Also that *for arts & sciences* JMU and VT are close to being peers and kid preference and specific course of study place a big role in a kid deciding which to choose. But, they aren’t ranked against each other at all in USNWR because VT is “national” under USNWR and JMU is “regional”.
So, in general, USNWR does kind of a hatchet job on the top 4-5 VA public colleges because kids consider WM and UVA side by side or VT and JMU, but USNWR ranking are out of whack with what’s happening on the ground.
Anonymous wrote:I’m not entirely sure what you are asking OP.
Is it this? I’m in VA, and there is a perception here that the current USNWR ranking underrate WM, because they stopped considering the places WM shines, like small classes for a public and undergrad teaching. And that outside of CS/engineering it should rank above VT. WM kids entering stats are almost identical to UVA’s and much higher than VTs, and kids that can easily get into VT Arts and Sciences often cannot get into WM. Really, WM should be evaluated as a LAC because who they are is a mismatch with the ranking criteria. But their law school and a couple other things prevent this.
Also that *for arts & sciences* JMU and VT are close to being peers and kid preference and specific course of study place a big role in a kid deciding which to choose. But, they aren’t ranked against each other at all in USNWR because VT is “national” under USNWR and JMU is “regional”.
So, in general, USNWR does kind of a hatchet job on the top 4-5 VA public colleges because kids consider WM and UVA side by side or VT and JMU, but USNWR ranking are out of whack with what’s happening on the ground.