Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There’s so much wonderful literature out in the world. It’s ok to toss the ones who condone child sexual abuse and read other people.
It doesn’t mean her work wasn’t good. It just means we have choices of how we spend our money and how libraries spend their money. It shouldn’t be on her work.
I don't know. I agree that separating the artist from the art is difficult when they are alive - by supporting the art you are also supporting the artist. But she is dead.
I am sure many great artists have done awful things that we don't even know about. I am in no way condoning what she - or anyone else - did. But I enjoyed her work before we knew about any of this. And I wouldn't rule out reading her work again, though I admit it does make me think twice.
She likened her daughter's sexual abuse as being similar to forgiving her husband for an extra martial affair. That is disordered thinking.
I am burning my books tonight. I do not want them to be enjoyed by anyone.
![]()
Just recycle them, jfc
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There’s so much wonderful literature out in the world. It’s ok to toss the ones who condone child sexual abuse and read other people.
It doesn’t mean her work wasn’t good. It just means we have choices of how we spend our money and how libraries spend their money. It shouldn’t be on her work.
I don't know. I agree that separating the artist from the art is difficult when they are alive - by supporting the art you are also supporting the artist. But she is dead.
I am sure many great artists have done awful things that we don't even know about. I am in no way condoning what she - or anyone else - did. But I enjoyed her work before we knew about any of this. And I wouldn't rule out reading her work again, though I admit it does make me think twice.
She likened her daughter's sexual abuse as being similar to forgiving her husband for an extra martial affair. That is disordered thinking.
I am burning my books tonight. I do not want them to be enjoyed by anyone.
Anonymous wrote:Why is this coming up again? It was HUGE news back in the summer. Is there something new to the story?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There’s so much wonderful literature out in the world. It’s ok to toss the ones who condone child sexual abuse and read other people.
It doesn’t mean her work wasn’t good. It just means we have choices of how we spend our money and how libraries spend their money. It shouldn’t be on her work.
I don't know. I agree that separating the artist from the art is difficult when they are alive - by supporting the art you are also supporting the artist. But she is dead.
I am sure many great artists have done awful things that we don't even know about. I am in no way condoning what she - or anyone else - did. But I enjoyed her work before we knew about any of this. And I wouldn't rule out reading her work again, though I admit it does make me think twice.
Anonymous wrote:There’s so much wonderful literature out in the world. It’s ok to toss the ones who condone child sexual abuse and read other people.
It doesn’t mean her work wasn’t good. It just means we have choices of how we spend our money and how libraries spend their money. It shouldn’t be on her work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Never read her books and I won't start now. What a horrible woman.
Never heard of her, but jeez. What a rotten person.
How have you never heard of Alice Munro?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Never read her books and I won't start now. What a horrible woman.
Never heard of her, but jeez. What a rotten person.
Anonymous wrote:There’s so much wonderful literature out in the world. It’s ok to toss the ones who condone child sexual abuse and read other people.
It doesn’t mean her work wasn’t good. It just means we have choices of how we spend our money and how libraries spend their money. It shouldn’t be on her work.
Anonymous wrote:Could someone please provide a gift link to the article?
Anonymous wrote:I never fully understand people who say you should separate the art from the artist. I think the art and the artist are inextricably linked.
Anonymous wrote:I never fully understand people who say you should separate the art from the artist. I think the art and the artist are inextricably linked.
Anonymous wrote:Never read her books and I won't start now. What a horrible woman.