Anonymous wrote:I teach my sons to run far far away from promiscuous girls. I show them all the examples around us wherever I can of men’s lives who were ruined by the choice the engage in one night stands, “friends with benefits”, and any other cheap premarital sex. Those men often end up with battling assault allegations, child support payments, STDs, heart hardening heartbreak, violent ex-lovers, etc. This is a major way that they can protect themselves. We teach and emphasize marriage instead and the success stories of those that choose reverent, conservative, and modest spouses. We also teach them to be reverent, conservative, and modest so as to attract the same energy.
As far as protecting others, well I don’t really think that is their job. Parents need to be teaching girls how to respect and protect themselves. Hence the reason for the other thread.
Anonymous wrote:Parents of boys:
How are you raising your SONS to be respectful, decent, honorable, kind, and protective of others and of themselves? How are you teaching YOUR SONS to be aware, to get consent, to not drug women, to not rape women, to not harass women…or anyone? How are you preparing YOUR SONS to be a safe person, and to stay safe?
I am so tired of “how are we preparing girls.” I want to hear more from parents of boys how you are being part of the solution, how you are being proactive, how you are making positive change in this world where boys and men are usually the aggressors, the unsafe people, the predators, the perpetrators. I want to know what you are teaching your SONS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was honestly hoping this thread would be about teaching boys to protect themselves, as statistically, your sons are far more likely to be the victims of violent crimes than you daughters.
But alas, it’s just more typical DCUM misandry.
Where are you getting your statistics? The problem is men. Men attack women and other men. How is that misandry?
Do you dispute that men are more likely than women to be *victims* of violent crime? Not victims of women, victims of violent crime?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was honestly hoping this thread would be about teaching boys to protect themselves, as statistically, your sons are far more likely to be the victims of violent crimes than you daughters.
But alas, it’s just more typical DCUM misandry.
Where are you getting your statistics? The problem is men. Men attack women and other men. How is that misandry?
Do you dispute that men are more likely than women to be *victims* of violent crime? Not victims of women, victims of violent crime?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was honestly hoping this thread would be about teaching boys to protect themselves, as statistically, your sons are far more likely to be the victims of violent crimes than you daughters.
But alas, it’s just more typical DCUM misandry.
Where are you getting your statistics? The problem is men. Men attack women and other men. How is that misandry?
Anonymous wrote:I was honestly hoping this thread would be about teaching boys to protect themselves, as statistically, your sons are far more likely to be the victims of violent crimes than you daughters.
But alas, it’s just more typical DCUM misandry.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These boy-moms need to lead by eliminating any hint of toxic masculinity developing in their sons.
What about the boy dads? Any responsibility there?
Anonymous wrote:I married a man who isn't a toxic douchebag and the rest took care of itself. DS never showed the slightest hint of being that type of guy.
Anonymous wrote:I married a man who isn't a toxic douchebag and the rest took care of itself. DS never showed the slightest hint of being that type of guy.
I think it was also helpful that he was never interested in team sports and never exposed to locker room culture. He mostly hung out with music and theater types and always had a lot of female friends and a close relationship with his sister. He's in a 2+ year relationship with a woman he met in college (both in grad school now)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These boy-moms need to lead by eliminating any hint of toxic masculinity developing in their sons.
What about the boy dads? Any responsibility there?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I married a man who isn't a toxic douchebag and the rest took care of itself. DS never showed the slightest hint of being that type of guy.
I think it was also helpful that he was never interested in team sports and never exposed to locker room culture. He mostly hung out with music and theater types and always had a lot of female friends and a close relationship with his sister. He's in a 2+ year relationship with a woman he met in college (both in grad school now)
This.
Douche dads, enabling and coddling moms who ignore and clean up their messes, and team sports (filled with more enabling adults) + likely a genetic predisposition to having an issue with alcohol = disaster
I wonder if Harvey Weinstein was more involved with team sports or the theater types…