Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:oooo. burn. omg... nailed it. Are you flexing in front of the mirror rn? DaaaaanG!
Not exactly a witty retort. This the kind of comeback someone does when they don't have anything else.
Enlighten us as to who you are and why you are an expert on goalkeeping. Otherwise, your opinion isn't worth any more than anyone else's. You're just another guy. And as typical of this area, a guy who thinks their opinion is better than everyone else's.
Anonymous wrote:oooo. burn. omg... nailed it. Are you flexing in front of the mirror rn? DaaaaanG!
Anonymous wrote:If you cite an anomoly, like a 'short' keeper, that's like saying Spud Webb won the slam dunk contest once, so <6' NBA players are just as good as 6'10" players. Stop. There will always be anomolies... short pitchers, short QB, short bball players. This is the NORM... 300+ colleges, there's room for all keeper sizes. For women tho, over 6' is the anomaly as 5'8" is the norm. No HC cares about keepers when he has 10 field players they have to care about. It's the opposite of NFL HC where they mostly care about the QB.
Anonymous wrote:I have a son who is in the midst of the recruiting process. He is under 6 ft which he believes is a deal breaker for d1. He is a good keep though and hopefully someone will give him an opportunity. He has studied rosters and found some small D3 schools have shorter keepers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^provides zero rebuttal lmao
No need. You're wrong but are so up yourself you would not listen anyway. That you are supposedly a functioning adult who adds "lmao" shows all anyone needs to know.
You're right frankly. I won't. I've seen it, watched it, heard of it, live it. I don't need an anon to explain what is factual. Just relax. Differing opinions are okay nowadays.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^provides zero rebuttal lmao
No need. You're wrong but are so up yourself you would not listen anyway. That you are supposedly a functioning adult who adds "lmao" shows all anyone needs to know.
Anonymous wrote:^provides zero rebuttal lmao