Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/jack-smith-files-to-drop-jan-6-charges-against-donald-trump/ar-AA1uJuxx?ocid=BingNewsSerp
So much for muh J6. Womp womp.
Uh, if you read it, you will understand that the reaiity is Trump would be unprecedented in firing a special counsel anyhow. At least this way, a written report can be provided to the American public.
Meanwhile, the Classified documents case will continue against the co-conspirators, at least until trump pardons them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The special counsel filed a motion to dismiss Donald Trump’s election-obstruction case without prejudice, which means the case could be revived in the future.
Trump cannot stop time. 2029 will be here soon.
In other words, they hold charges over the president's head to make sure he governs as the elites want. Insane.
Yes. There are lots of problems with our system. Our esteemed Founding Fathers didn't think we'd be stupid enough to elect a felon and an insurrectionist. Or that our Senate would be so cowardly as to fail to impeach him. Failures all around.
Anonymous wrote:The special counsel filed a motion to dismiss Donald Trump’s election-obstruction case without prejudice, which means the case could be revived in the future.
Trump cannot stop time. 2029 will be here soon.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:May karma descend upon him with all that he so richly deserves and may it come soon and in spades.
May that karma visit your stupid self.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The special counsel filed a motion to dismiss Donald Trump’s election-obstruction case without prejudice, which means the case could be revived in the future.
Trump cannot stop time. 2029 will be here soon.
In other words, they hold charges over the president's head to make sure he governs as the elites want. Insane.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"[A] new federal grand jury indicted Trump on the same four charges again in August, alleging that Trump's false claims about mass voter fraud during the 2020 election were "unsupported, objectively unreasonable, and ever-changing" and that Trump "knew that they were false."
And you guys are happy about this?
Having an opinion about an election is illegal?
Broadcasting a bogus opinion about an election for the purpose of fomenting a coup is illegal. Yes.
(Prior to January 6, 2021, sedition was an outdated crime that was considered unconstitutional under the First Amendment. Trump brought it back to life.)
Expressing an opinion is not the same as fighting words and those bringing the charges knew that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/jack-smith-files-to-drop-jan-6-charges-against-donald-trump/ar-AA1uJuxx?ocid=BingNewsSerp
So much for muh J6. Womp womp.
What point are you trying to make? Did you struggle to spell 'my'?
NP... The point is obvious. If the case was really that important and backed by solid and provable evidence than it should not have been dropped. You know that rule of law thing...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"[A] new federal grand jury indicted Trump on the same four charges again in August, alleging that Trump's false claims about mass voter fraud during the 2020 election were "unsupported, objectively unreasonable, and ever-changing" and that Trump "knew that they were false."
And you guys are happy about this?
Having an opinion about an election is illegal?
Broadcasting a bogus opinion about an election for the purpose of fomenting a coup is illegal. Yes.
(Prior to January 6, 2021, sedition was an outdated crime that was considered unconstitutional under the First Amendment. Trump brought it back to life.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"[A] new federal grand jury indicted Trump on the same four charges again in August, alleging that Trump's false claims about mass voter fraud during the 2020 election were "unsupported, objectively unreasonable, and ever-changing" and that Trump "knew that they were false."
And you guys are happy about this?
Having an opinion about an election is illegal?
Anonymous wrote:"[A] new federal grand jury indicted Trump on the same four charges again in August, alleging that Trump's false claims about mass voter fraud during the 2020 election were "unsupported, objectively unreasonable, and ever-changing" and that Trump "knew that they were false."
And you guys are happy about this?
Anonymous wrote:The special counsel filed a motion to dismiss Donald Trump’s election-obstruction case without prejudice, which means the case could be revived in the future.
Trump cannot stop time. 2029 will be here soon.
Anonymous wrote:Just wait until they get the unredacted DOJ report on J6 and it shows that DOJ had hundreds of paid confidential informants working with ANTIFA to foment violence. J6 was 100% orchestrated by the Deep State.