Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sure, he sounds like a jerk. But I cannot tell if he traded these two kids because they suck at the sport or if they have behavioral/communication challenges due to autism.
But at the end of the day, I would be glad the two kids with autism aren’t stuck with the total jerk for a coach. And hopefully, my husband could help support those two kids in the best way possible. So I would reframe this as “thank goodness these two kids ended up with a much better fit for a coach.”
I think the big win here is that the kids with autism are not going to be with a coach who is probably a d*ck.
That said, the whole point of rec is for kids to have fun playing in a low pressure environment, and for parents to enjoy and support that environment. There shouldn’t be trading at all outside of some really extreme circumstance.
It’s OPs husbands turn to coach these kids. OP seems pretty pissed about it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So now you have an A and a B team. This is usually how things go.
No not at all, it’s a non competitive league. They don’t even keep score
So why are you so put out about losing two good players for the “autistic kids”? Who cares? Let them play without complaining about your two new kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At my son’s elementary school about 20 boys play a low key rec basketball league every year since K. My son is 8 and in 3rd grade. The league doesn’t even keep score just to show you how low key it is.
My husband is coaching one of the teams and he got his roster of 10 kids. They typically put friends together who lost each other. In the grade there’s two boy groups with some mutual friends in each. When the other team’s coach got their roster they weren’t happy with the kids and asked the league to trade two kids, who are also athletic good kids to his team. I thought that was surprising and then when my husband got his new roster I realized he traded off 2 autistic kids. No big deal to my husband who has coached one before but isn’t this poor behavior to be trading kids off so you can have a better team? In a rec league for 8 year old children that doesn’t keep score?! Something about the whole situation is really bothering me, especially because they have a few kids who even play select on that team. What kind of person cares this much if their rec team wins or loses?
OP, the other coach said "I'm not happy with my team, we need to trade?" I find that a little hard to believe.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So now you have an A and a B team. This is usually how things go.
No not at all, it’s a non competitive league. They don’t even keep score
Anonymous wrote:So now you have an A and a B team. This is usually how things go.
Anonymous wrote:At my son’s elementary school about 20 boys play a low key rec basketball league every year since K. My son is 8 and in 3rd grade. The league doesn’t even keep score just to show you how low key it is.
My husband is coaching one of the teams and he got his roster of 10 kids. They typically put friends together who lost each other. In the grade there’s two boy groups with some mutual friends in each. When the other team’s coach got their roster they weren’t happy with the kids and asked the league to trade two kids, who are also athletic good kids to his team. I thought that was surprising and then when my husband got his new roster I realized he traded off 2 autistic kids. No big deal to my husband who has coached one before but isn’t this poor behavior to be trading kids off so you can have a better team? In a rec league for 8 year old children that doesn’t keep score?! Something about the whole situation is really bothering me, especially because they have a few kids who even play select on that team. What kind of person cares this much if their rec team wins or loses?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sure, he sounds like a jerk. But I cannot tell if he traded these two kids because they suck at the sport or if they have behavioral/communication challenges due to autism.
But at the end of the day, I would be glad the two kids with autism aren’t stuck with the total jerk for a coach. And hopefully, my husband could help support those two kids in the best way possible. So I would reframe this as “thank goodness these two kids ended up with a much better fit for a coach.”
I think the big win here is that the kids with autism are not going to be with a coach who is probably a d*ck.
That said, the whole point of rec is for kids to have fun playing in a low pressure environment, and for parents to enjoy and support that environment. There shouldn’t be trading at all outside of some really extreme circumstance.
Anonymous wrote:Sure, he sounds like a jerk. But I cannot tell if he traded these two kids because they suck at the sport or if they have behavioral/communication challenges due to autism.
But at the end of the day, I would be glad the two kids with autism aren’t stuck with the total jerk for a coach. And hopefully, my husband could help support those two kids in the best way possible. So I would reframe this as “thank goodness these two kids ended up with a much better fit for a coach.”
Anonymous wrote:It may not be about winning/losing, but about having a good experience for the kids. It's more fun to be on a team with skilled players who want to be there and are focused/enthusiastic. If the coach has the privilege to request changes to give his own kid a better experience, that's kind of one of the perks of (volunteer!) coaching.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They shouldn’t even be trading for friends. You got your list, that’s it. And what he did was despicable. Another failed athlete fantasizing about being a real coach.
Sooooo quick to judge aren't you misandrist one?
Pssst..these guys volunteer their time for these kids.
You?