Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a problem with the way the article was written. I know these things happen and I do understand, but the journalist wrote it in such a way as to normalize and glamorize what are essentially pedophile relationships. He starts off the article in a breathy way, calling it the greatest love story ever, he talks about how irresistible it was to be in front of this beautiful 16-year-old, it's incredibly creepy and it shows how our culture sexualizes female children in particular, and makes it seem both sexy and OK for middle-aged men to leer at them, target them, and have sex with them. The article not only justified what happened, but made it seem glamorous.
I'm definitely not the only person thinking this, there are a lot of people out there who were appalled by the article. I am an open minded person, and as a teen girl I had many crushes on older men, but for some reason this article gave me really bad feelings. I mean do we want a culture where girls are married off at puberty to men in their 40s and 50s?
That’s the Atlantic for you. Really annoying writing style.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If I were in her shoes I would have told him to stop writing books that leeched off my personal life. Even if he was a great writer.
Seems like trauma + manic pixie dreamgirl + guns was his ideal.
No thanks.
Yeah, I don't personally judge the individuals in this story (in large part because I haven't read the article yet) but I sure do judge how our society positions and objectifies teenage girls, guns, and hates on women who are capable of standing up for themselves.
Anonymous wrote:I have no prob with this either. Some of you want life to be "right" and "good" as in making sense. Except life is messy, totally insensible and can be quite ugly. The most important thing is perspective and perception. The writer "romanticizes" the unacceptable relationship because the subject - her - felt that their relationship was a benefit. She enjoyed her time with him and they were into each other. Why does anything else matter it's not like she was 10. At that age of 16/17, esp back in the day, it's old enough. And I don't think it's anyone's business but theirs as long as she felt it was beautiful.
People judge and they scold. This is in the grand scheme of life not exactly a debacle.
I personally had a relationship with someone who "wasn't good for me" yet I consider him the love of my life even as I can't be with him. In dark times it's those memories I hold onto. Ain't nobody's business or place to judge me.
Anonymous wrote:I have a problem with the way the article was written. I know these things happen and I do understand, but the journalist wrote it in such a way as to normalize and glamorize what are essentially pedophile relationships. He starts off the article in a breathy way, calling it the greatest love story ever, he talks about how irresistible it was to be in front of this beautiful 16-year-old, it's incredibly creepy and it shows how our culture sexualizes female children in particular, and makes it seem both sexy and OK for middle-aged men to leer at them, target them, and have sex with them. The article not only justified what happened, but made it seem glamorous.
I'm definitely not the only person thinking this, there are a lot of people out there who were appalled by the article. I am an open minded person, and as a teen girl I had many crushes on older men, but for some reason this article gave me really bad feelings. I mean do we want a culture where girls are married off at puberty to men in their 40s and 50s?
Anonymous wrote:If I were in her shoes I would have told him to stop writing books that leeched off my personal life. Even if he was a great writer.
Seems like trauma + manic pixie dreamgirl + guns was his ideal.
No thanks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What does “muse” mean in this context? Was he banging a 16-year old when he was 40?
Famous author is revealed to be the sexual predator / experience plagarist of an underage girl.
This one is not really bothering me. Not sure she was underage either. 17 is not underage in most states at that time. And the part about being chased by the FBI seems flat out false to me. Never happened.
Well yeah it's false. He lied because that's what predators do
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What does “muse” mean in this context? Was he banging a 16-year old when he was 40?
Famous author is revealed to be the sexual predator / experience plagarist of an underage girl.
This one is not really bothering me. Not sure she was underage either. 17 is not underage in most states at that time. And the part about being chased by the FBI seems flat out false to me. Never happened.