Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t work that way.
Congrats on the baby though!
Yes it actually does. Good looking people often create good looking kids.
Nope, ever heard of reversion to mean?
Reversion to the mean is absolutely consistent with attractive people have attractive kids. It’s just that the second generation of attractive parents is on average less attractive. It does not mean the second generation skips over average and goes to ugly. At all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t work that way.
Congrats on the baby though!
Yes it actually does. Good looking people often create good looking kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t work that way.
Congrats on the baby though!
Yes it actually does. Good looking people often create good looking kids.
That's definitely not how it works. But ok...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t work that way.
Congrats on the baby though!
Yes it actually does. Good looking people often create good looking kids.
Funny then how all the gorgeous models and actors of the previous generation were the children of nobodies, and none of their nepo baby kids are as attractive as they are.
I can think of lots of examples of good looking kids from good looking parents. Kim Kardashian - her mother Kris was absolutely stunning in her prime. Gigi Hadid - her mother was very good looking. Kaia Gerber - her mother was a super model. Sailor Brinkley is very attractive. Clint Eastwood’s son, Scott, is very attractive. Good looks often run in families. Some famous people don’t have famous parents. Not sure why you are triggered by this?
Kaia Gerber and Sailor Brinkley, while very attractive, are not as good looking as their mothers were at their ages.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t work that way.
Congrats on the baby though!
Yes it actually does. Good looking people often create good looking kids.
Nope, ever heard of reversion to mean?
Reversion to the mean is absolutely consistent with attractive people have attractive kids. It’s just that the second generation of attractive parents is on average less attractive. It does not mean the second generation skips over average and goes to ugly. At all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t work that way.
Congrats on the baby though!
Yes it actually does. Good looking people often create good looking kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t work that way.
Congrats on the baby though!
Yes it actually does. Good looking people often create good looking kids.
Nope, ever heard of reversion to mean?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t work that way.
Congrats on the baby though!
Yes it actually does. Good looking people often create good looking kids.
Funny then how all the gorgeous models and actors of the previous generation were the children of nobodies, and none of their nepo baby kids are as attractive as they are.
I can think of lots of examples of good looking kids from good looking parents. Kim Kardashian - her mother Kris was absolutely stunning in her prime. Gigi Hadid - her mother was very good looking. Kaia Gerber - her mother was a super model. Sailor Brinkley is very attractive. Clint Eastwood’s son, Scott, is very attractive. Good looks often run in families. Some famous people don’t have famous parents. Not sure why you are triggered by this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t work that way.
Congrats on the baby though!
Yes it actually does. Good looking people often create good looking kids.
Funny then how all the gorgeous models and actors of the previous generation were the children of nobodies, and none of their nepo baby kids are as attractive as they are.
I can think of lots of examples of good looking kids from good looking parents. Kim Kardashian - her mother Kris was absolutely stunning in her prime. Gigi Hadid - her mother was very good looking. Kaia Gerber - her mother was a super model. Sailor Brinkley is very attractive. Clint Eastwood’s son, Scott, is very attractive. Good looks often run in families. Some famous people don’t have famous parents. Not sure why you are triggered by this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t work that way.
Congrats on the baby though!
Yes it actually does. Good looking people often create good looking kids.
Funny then how all the gorgeous models and actors of the previous generation were the children of nobodies, and none of their nepo baby kids are as attractive as they are.
I can think of lots of examples of good looking kids from good looking parents. Kim Kardashian - her mother Kris was absolutely stunning in her prime. Gigi Hadid - her mother was very good looking. Kaia Gerber - her mother was a super model. Sailor Brinkley is very attractive. Clint Eastwood’s son, Scott, is very attractive. Good looks often run in families. Some famous people don’t have famous parents. Not sure why you are triggered by this?
Yeah but I bet they all have more average looking kids (the Kardashians are actually a great example of this - Kim was always stunning and the other kids were just normal cute.). In general I think it’s safe to say that being a great beauty is the exception, no matter the parentage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t work that way.
Congrats on the baby though!
Yes it actually does. Good looking people often create good looking kids.
Funny then how all the gorgeous models and actors of the previous generation were the children of nobodies, and none of their nepo baby kids are as attractive as they are.
I can think of lots of examples of good looking kids from good looking parents. Kim Kardashian - her mother Kris was absolutely stunning in her prime. Gigi Hadid - her mother was very good looking. Kaia Gerber - her mother was a super model. Sailor Brinkley is very attractive. Clint Eastwood’s son, Scott, is very attractive. Good looks often run in families. Some famous people don’t have famous parents. Not sure why you are triggered by this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t work that way.
Congrats on the baby though!
Yes it actually does. Good looking people often create good looking kids.
Funny then how all the gorgeous models and actors of the previous generation were the children of nobodies, and none of their nepo baby kids are as attractive as they are.
I can think of lots of examples of good looking kids from good looking parents. Kim Kardashian - her mother Kris was absolutely stunning in her prime. Gigi Hadid - her mother was very good looking. Kaia Gerber - her mother was a super model. Sailor Brinkley is very attractive. Clint Eastwood’s son, Scott, is very attractive. Good looks often run in families. Some famous people don’t have famous parents. Not sure why you are triggered by this?
You are rating the skills of plastic surgeons, not generations of people.
Have you not seen pics of the Kardashian women from earlier in their lives?? Not quite so hot.
Nope. Prior to any plastic surgery these were all good looking people with good looking parents.