Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Loving? Brown vs board? Griswold? Will these get overturned? If so what will happen? Does anybody care?

Don’t be silly.

Don’t be naive

You think Clarence Thomas will overturn Loving? I mean I hate the guy and think he's terrible but I don't think he'll do that.

No, that would be so unpopular they’d never do that

They will however go after gay marriage and will probably allow more “conscience objection laws based on firmly held beliefs” type of stuff. You know more or allowing doctors to not treat trans people based on organized religion.

So you’d be OK with a government tha forced you to treat LGBTQ+ even if went against your beliefs? Ridiculous. Doctors / hospitals should be transparent about what they will or won’t do. often they not doing things because they are run by private equity now but that’s a separate issue. Maybe we need different medical designations to handle this.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sotomayor must resign immediately, so that Biden can replace her before Trump gets into office.

And then what? It’ll still be a huge majority when the older two conservative SC justice’s retire now to allow room for some 35 year old zealots. Get used to losing! Maybe tone down the woke bullsht and the whining and focus on the economy and quality of life stuff like fighting crime. Or don’t. Continue to focus on fringe crap and defunding the police and lose.

So annoying. I’m liberal and I can’t believe we’ve lost abortion in so many places and it’s whiny other liberals who have done it.

LOL. The economy. Do any of you fools read the news. Elon said we need to “belt tighten.” Also, job losses from mass gutting of the government and widening income gap will only increase crime. You do know that lack of abortion care was directly tied to crime levels, since unwanted babies didn’t have social services, right? You know this, my liberal friend, right?!!!
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna177807

Why are you yelling at a poster that agrees with you? You are providing an example of one major issue within the dem party. One little slight about … something … and you’re crucifying one of your own.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Loving? Brown vs board? Griswold? Will these get overturned? If so what will happen? Does anybody care?

Don’t be silly.

Don’t be naive

You think Clarence Thomas will overturn Loving? I mean I hate the guy and think he's terrible but I don't think he'll do that.

No, that would be so unpopular they’d never do that

They will however go after gay marriage and will probably allow more “conscience objection laws based on firmly held beliefs” type of stuff. You know more or allowing doctors to not treat trans people based on organized religion.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sotomayor must resign immediately, so that Biden can replace her before Trump gets into office.

And then what? It’ll still be a huge majority when the older two conservative SC justice’s retire now to allow room for some 35 year old zealots. Get used to losing! Maybe tone down the woke bullsht and the whining and focus on the economy and quality of life stuff like fighting crime. Or don’t. Continue to focus on fringe crap and defunding the police and lose.

So annoying. I’m liberal and I can’t believe we’ve lost abortion in so many places and it’s whiny other liberals who have done it.

+1

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Sotomayor must resign immediately, so that Biden can replace her before Trump gets into office. [/quote]

And then what? It’ll still be a huge majority when the older two conservative SC justice’s retire now to allow room for some 35 year old zealots. Get used to losing! Maybe tone down the woke bullsht and the whining and focus on the economy and quality of life stuff like fighting crime. Or don’t. Continue to focus on fringe crap and defunding the police and lose.

So annoying. I’m liberal and I can’t believe we’ve lost abortion in so many places and it’s whiny other liberals who have done it.[/quote]

LOL. The economy. Do any of you fools read the news. Elon said we need to “belt tighten.” Also, job losses from mass gutting of the government and widening income gap will only increase crime. You do know that lack of abortion care was directly tied to crime levels, since unwanted babies didn’t have social services, right? You know this, my liberal friend, right?!!!
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna177807
[/quote]


I’m pro choice buddy. And I’ve read Freakonimics and know all about abortion and crime levels.

Yes, focus on the pocket book and not on woke whining. Hope you get the message and change your thinking. I’ve learned America is much more centrist than anyone could have believed.

I’m guessing you won’t get it and will continue putting up stupid yards signs in your lawn and complaining about fringe issues while drinking Nespresso in your nice Bethesda home, but maybe you should consider a complete 180 if you want to win future elections.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Loving? Brown vs board? Griswold? Will these get overturned? If so what will happen? Does anybody care?

Don’t be silly.

Don’t be naive

You think Clarence Thomas will overturn Loving? I mean I hate the guy and think he's terrible but I don't think he'll do that.

Pretty sure Republicans moto is "Rules For Thee but Not for Me".

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Loving? Brown vs board? Griswold? Will these get overturned? If so what will happen? Does anybody care?

Don’t be silly.

Don’t be naive

You think Clarence Thomas will overturn Loving? I mean I hate the guy and think he's terrible but I don't think he'll do that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sotomayor must resign immediately, so that Biden can replace her before Trump gets into office.

And then what? It’ll still be a huge majority when the older two conservative SC justice’s retire now to allow room for some 35 year old zealots. Get used to losing! Maybe tone down the woke bullsht and the whining and focus on the economy and quality of life stuff like fighting crime. Or don’t. Continue to focus on fringe crap and defunding the police and lose.

So annoying. I’m liberal and I can’t believe we’ve lost abortion in so many places and it’s whiny other liberals who have done it.

LOL. The economy. Do any of you fools read the news. Elon said we need to “belt tighten.” Also, job losses from mass gutting of the government and widening income gap will only increase crime. You do know that lack of abortion care was directly tied to crime levels, since unwanted babies didn’t have social services, right? You know this, my liberal friend, right?!!!
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna177807

Anonymous wrote:Sotomayor must resign immediately, so that Biden can replace her before Trump gets into office.

And then what? It’ll still be a huge majority when the older two conservative SC justice’s retire now to allow room for some 35 year old zealots. Get used to losing! Maybe tone down the woke bullsht and the whining and focus on the economy and quality of life stuff like fighting crime. Or don’t. Continue to focus on fringe crap and defunding the police and lose.

So annoying. I’m liberal and I can’t believe we’ve lost abortion in so many places and it’s whiny other liberals who have done it.

Anonymous wrote:Sotomayor must resign immediately, so that Biden can replace her before Trump gets into office.

You think a replacement can be found and approved before January 20???? Hahahaha. She needs to stay at least 4 more years.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Loving? Brown vs board? Griswold? Will these get overturned? If so what will happen? Does anybody care?

Don’t be silly.

This is what they said about Roe too.

Roe is easy to understand if you have any sense. They did not "outlaw abortion" as people here like to say. They ruled it’s a State issue not a Federal issue, because it is. Don’t like what your State has to say about it, change it at that level. As frustrating as it is, legally it’s the correct ruling.

Look dude. The point being there are 6 extremely religious people on the SC. They chose to destroy the concept of stare decisis when it was convenient to further their ideology. “Settled case law” is no more and now the door is open to do it to other things, like Gay marriage.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Loving? Brown vs board? Griswold? Will these get overturned? If so what will happen? Does anybody care?

Don’t be silly.

Yes, you’re right. Those are all settled case law. Just like Roe was settled case law.

Anonymous wrote:Sotomayor must resign immediately, so that Biden can replace her before Trump gets into office.

What? With who? And why?

Sotomayor must resign immediately, so that Biden can replace her before Trump gets into office.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Loving? Brown vs board? Griswold? Will these get overturned? If so what will happen? Does anybody care?

Don’t be silly.

This is what they said about Roe too.

Roe is easy to understand if you have any sense. They did not "outlaw abortion" as people here like to say. They ruled it’s a State issue not a Federal issue, because it is. Don’t like what your State has to say about it, change it at that level. As frustrating as it is, legally it’s the correct ruling.

This current Supreme Court is getting rid of stare decisis. Hence OP's question.

As for revisiting the Fourteenth Amendment and birthright citizenship, that is insane sovereign citizen stuff. The alt right is loud on the Internet but not IRL.