Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe people will come around to the idea that privatizing everything is not a good thing when they have to mail out something that used to cost 60 cents, and instead have to pay 7 dollars to FedEx/UPS/DHL whatever.
Yep. Trump must see a way to gain money for himself by doing this. I don't think he's motivated by anything other than earning money to pay his legal bills or avoiding jail time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't see the point of privatizing it. All of the profitable shipping has been picked of by UPS and FedEx.
The only point would be... to mess with mail in ballots.
It's about getting rid of the non-cost effective stuff, like rural delivery. UPS, FedEx, and Amazon subcontract to USPS to deliver to those areas because otherwise it would be prohibitively expensive. Let the free market work! Why should the federal government subsidize those very successful companies?
Anonymous wrote:Maybe people will come around to the idea that privatizing everything is not a good thing when they have to mail out something that used to cost 60 cents, and instead have to pay 7 dollars to FedEx/UPS/DHL whatever.
Anonymous wrote:Those of you who say we don't need it anymore must not do any shipping.
Some USPS facts:
-The USPS is the only service that does NOT have a rural fee or residential delivery fee.
-They are the only service that does not have a fee for fuel or emissions offset.
-They are the only service that does not charge more during peak shipping times, like Christmas.
-USPS' API is also the most accurate when integrated into your online shopping cart. Our online shopping cart displays the shipping prices of USPS, UPS, and FedEx for our customers to pick. USPS is always accurate within pennies of what the actual shipping price ends up being. UPS' is the worst.
Just today a customer paid $20 for UPS Ground shipping but I had to swap their order to USPS because the actual UPS price once I entered the information jumped up to $30.23. The UPS API must only use zip codes to determine price and not actual addresses, because when entering the address on ups.com, it added additional fees for residential delivery and rural delivery. It's why we have a note on our site that shipping method may be changed at our discretion to accommodate price fluctuations. That same package shipped via USPS for $10.05 and we got to refund the customer $9.
Anonymous wrote:The postal service wasn’t privatized to begin with because rural service isn’t profitable but our rural citizen deserve a good mail service. The government often steps in to provide services to rural communities because corporations won’t. See also the rural electrification project.
Anonymous wrote:The postal service wasn’t privatized to begin with because rural service isn’t profitable but our rural citizen deserve a good mail service. The government often steps in to provide services to rural communities because corporations won’t. See also the rural electrification project.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't see the point of privatizing it. All of the profitable shipping has been picked of by UPS and FedEx.
The only point would be... to mess with mail in ballots.
It's about getting rid of the non-cost effective stuff, like rural delivery. UPS, FedEx, and Amazon subcontract to USPS to deliver to those areas because otherwise it would be prohibitively expensive. Let the free market work! Why should the federal government subsodize those very successful companies?
Some things are a service supported by taxes and fees. Is the US military supposed to drive a profit? The National weather service? NIH?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't see the point of privatizing it. All of the profitable shipping has been picked of by UPS and FedEx.
The only point would be... to mess with mail in ballots.
It's about getting rid of the non-cost effective stuff, like rural delivery. UPS, FedEx, and Amazon subcontract to USPS to deliver to those areas because otherwise it would be prohibitively expensive. Let the free market work! Why should the federal government subsodize those very successful companies?
Anonymous wrote:I don't see the point of privatizing it. All of the profitable shipping has been picked of by UPS and FedEx.
The only point would be... to mess with mail in ballots.