Anonymous wrote:DOJ will likely remain flat or cut a few duplicative offices in the next few years. It is one of the few necessary agencies that is needed in the Fed government. Many of the other functions of these agencies can be slimmed down and delegated to the states to handle.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DOJ will likely remain flat or cut a few duplicative offices in the next few years. It is one of the few necessary agencies that is needed in the Fed government. Many of the other functions of these agencies can be slimmed down and delegated to the states to handle.
Because all of the states have sooooo much money to take over vital roles and duplicate existing resources times 50. I though you guys were the party of efficiency?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s crazy that laws would be laxed due to party lines. This just blows my mind.
Sadly, a lot of DOJ investigations have a political element. Jack Smith should be continuing his prosecution against Trump. But here we are.
Anonymous wrote:It’s crazy that laws would be laxed due to party lines. This just blows my mind.
Anonymous wrote:What about DOJ Antitrust? I feel we’re quite apolitical. But Trump being Trump, all bets are off
Anonymous wrote:DOJ will likely remain flat or cut a few duplicative offices in the next few years. It is one of the few necessary agencies that is needed in the Fed government. Many of the other functions of these agencies can be slimmed down and delegated to the states to handle.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How will the new administration go about dealing with DOJ? Will DOJ get any funding at all to hire new employees in the next 4 years?
Our office already is down attorneys and has no budget to hire more.
Does anyone have an idea of specifics of how this plays out?
Did the attorneys leave and the jobs were not back filled?
I know a few people who left DOJ but it was because they did not like the return to office requirements of their specific components. They left for jobs with more flexibility