Anonymous wrote:So you think noncitizens should be voting, which they don't have the right to do? What is wrong with you?
Anonymous wrote:So it can continue
https://x.com/jasonmiyaresva/status/1851626618147495997?s=46&t=Rw_jX1uyupQwvEwsjuQulQ
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So you think noncitizens should be voting, which they don't have the right to do? What is wrong with you?
+1000 i don't understand how people think breaking the law is reasonable now!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So it can continue
https://x.com/jasonmiyaresva/status/1851626618147495997?s=46&t=Rw_jX1uyupQwvEwsjuQulQ
This is horrific
It sets the stage for more Republican cheating
It’s only 1600 votes however we are screwed that they took this now ugh
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So you think noncitizens should be voting, which they don't have the right to do? What is wrong with you?
I don't think that noncitizens should be voting, but there's no evidence that noncitizens are voting. I do think that removing citizens from the voter rolls, something that has been shown to happen as part of this "purge", with no way for them to get things corrected before the election, during the 3 months before the election when the National Voter Registration Act clearly states changes to the rolls can't be made, is wrong.
Anonymous wrote:So you think noncitizens should be voting, which they don't have the right to do? What is wrong with you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So you think noncitizens should be voting, which they don't have the right to do? What is wrong with you?
+1000 i don't understand how people think breaking the law is reasonable now!
The issue is that people are being purged from the rolls based on suspicion, not proof, and proof has been provided that actual citizens are being purged. If you would be fine being turned away when you go to vote because someone was suspicious of your citizenship (but more realisitically suspicious that you'd vote for their less-preferred candidate), then that's an interesting position to take. If you are fine with it happening to other citizens because you're pretty sure you're not the targeted demographic, well, I've got a solid guess as to who you're voting for.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So you think noncitizens should be voting, which they don't have the right to do? What is wrong with you?
+1000 i don't understand how people think breaking the law is reasonable now!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So you think noncitizens should be voting, which they don't have the right to do? What is wrong with you?
Why not?
No human being is illegal.
Anonymous wrote:So you think noncitizens should be voting, which they don't have the right to do? What is wrong with you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So you think noncitizens should be voting, which they don't have the right to do? What is wrong with you?
Why not?
No human being is illegal.
Anonymous wrote:Not a lawyer - how common is it for a SCOTUS to go against the opinion of lower courts when it was all unanimous decisions?
Anonymous wrote:So you think noncitizens should be voting, which they don't have the right to do? What is wrong with you?
Anonymous wrote:Virginia has had early voting open for weeks already. Are htey going to purge the votes of those who already voted?