Anonymous wrote:MSDE says he's lying about the alleged construction funding clawback
Anonymous wrote:You don't know who was actually making the poor decisions, when those decisions were made, who was consulted, who may have been supportive or opposed, etc. Lots of speculation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Beware the Parent Coalition finger pointers. I have no idea Essie McGuires level of involvement in both issues mentioned, but given it's information provided by those lunatics, I imagine there's some missing information or twisted information involved. Parent Coalition likes to dig up whatever they think is "gotcha" type data on anyone and anything MCPS and then point it out, with no background or context.
We are not litigating the Parents Coalition here. You’re right in that we don’t know what extent she had in both issues, but the POINT is that she was involved in both issues, which neither she, Taylor or the BOE are acknowledging. Despite being asked directly multiple times by the County Council if employees involved in both issues still worked for the system.
DP. That should be the point. We don't know, and people are speculating for their own reasons.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Beware the Parent Coalition finger pointers. I have no idea Essie McGuires level of involvement in both issues mentioned, but given it's information provided by those lunatics, I imagine there's some missing information or twisted information involved. Parent Coalition likes to dig up whatever they think is "gotcha" type data on anyone and anything MCPS and then point it out, with no background or context.
We are not litigating the Parents Coalition here. You’re right in that we don’t know what extent she had in both issues, but the POINT is that she was involved in both issues, which neither she, Taylor or the BOE are acknowledging. Despite being asked directly multiple times by the County Council if employees involved in both issues still worked for the system.
DP. That should be the point. We don't know, and people are speculating for their own reasons.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Beware the Parent Coalition finger pointers. I have no idea Essie McGuires level of involvement in both issues mentioned, but given it's information provided by those lunatics, I imagine there's some missing information or twisted information involved. Parent Coalition likes to dig up whatever they think is "gotcha" type data on anyone and anything MCPS and then point it out, with no background or context.
We are not litigating the Parents Coalition here. You’re right in that we don’t know what extent she had in both issues, but the POINT is that she was involved in both issues, which neither she, Taylor or the BOE are acknowledging. Despite being asked directly multiple times by the County Council if employees involved in both issues still worked for the system.
Anonymous wrote:Beware the Parent Coalition finger pointers. I have no idea Essie McGuires level of involvement in both issues mentioned, but given it's information provided by those lunatics, I imagine there's some missing information or twisted information involved. Parent Coalition likes to dig up whatever they think is "gotcha" type data on anyone and anything MCPS and then point it out, with no background or context.
Anonymous wrote:Beware the Parent Coalition finger pointers. I have no idea Essie McGuires level of involvement in both issues mentioned, but given it's information provided by those lunatics, I imagine there's some missing information or twisted information involved. Parent Coalition likes to dig up whatever they think is "gotcha" type data on anyone and anything MCPS and then point it out, with no background or context.
Anonymous wrote:Beware the Parent Coalition finger pointers. I have no idea Essie McGuires level of involvement in both issues mentioned, but given it's information provided by those lunatics, I imagine there's some missing information or twisted information involved. Parent Coalition likes to dig up whatever they think is "gotcha" type data on anyone and anything MCPS and then point it out, with no background or context.
Anonymous wrote:Be careful who you attack, as Ms. McGuire's competence is rare in MCPS and is much needed. It's unfortunate that she is being cast in a negative light on the basis of actions that occurred while she was not in MCPS
Anonymous wrote:Be careful who you attack, as Ms. McGuire's competence is rare in MCPS and is much needed. It's unfortunate that she is being cast in a negative light on the basis of actions that occurred while she was not in MCPS
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can you summarize what the original post said? I agree McGuire is a poor choice for this position. Shame on Taylor and BOE for not naming the people responsible for these multiple contract issues
Basically it recapped the fact that Essie had a hand in both the EV bus fiasco and now the CIP mess. I didn’t see anything controversial in it…
Full disclosure: I know Essie personally and respect her, most people who have worked with her do.
What evidence did it present for blaming her for these things? I think it's quite problematic to denounce a public servant without evidence.
Her signature on both documents....
https://parentscoalitionmc.blogspot.com/2024/10/mcps-chief-of-staff-essie-mcguire.html
https://parentscoalitionmc.blogspot.com/2024/08/county-council-staffer-essie-mcguire.html
In other words she was MCPS chief of staff at the time these things were done.
It really just sounds like you have an axe to grind against her.
She was not chief of staff at the time of both instances. She was an MCPS Associate Superintendent of Operations in both documents. Are you illiterate?
Wow, you are horrible.
She was not working for MCPS when they failed to enforce the contract. She supported the contract itself, but as I understand it the problem was that MCPS didn't enforce the contract.
Calling for Essie to be fired for this is beyond the pale.