Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought conventional wisdom says you need 10xs your income. So you need 2.5
No, conventional wisdom is 30x your income, or less conservative, 25x your income.
I really would like to know how people think you need an income from your investments of $250k when retired. What on earth do you think you will be spending it on? That's our current household income with 2 kids, including saving a significant amount for retirement, kids college, and the random costs associated with kids. In 15 years we will have none of those costs/needs.
I'm not the PP you're responding to, but do you possibly think that everyone's expenses are the same as yours? There is a huge list of variables in how/where people live. Property taxes alone vary from state to state, not to mention even zip code to zip code. Auto/house/umbrella insurance vary. Healthcare costs and insurance vary. Cost of living varies. And if you have more than one house, much of that list is doubled.
I have two high end cars, very expensive to insure.
We have expensive jewelry that is expensive to insure.
We live in an area that has high home owner insurance rates.
We have an HOA.
Am I complaining? No. I am just saying that it might cost you 45K to live, but it costs me a great deal more than that before I ever even think about taking a trip. So my NW at retirement needs to support what *I* spend.
Anonymous wrote:Nearing retirement now. College and wedding of kids done. 200K pension. 2 million savings. House worth 800K, 200K left but because of low interest rates that we are not paying off. Hoping that we will retire in place. We are not including home in our net savings. Not counting SS either. I do not have long term disability insurance so I will have to be healthy (and I am not). So that is a bummer.
We live comfortably on 140K.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought conventional wisdom says you need 10xs your income. So you need 2.5
No, conventional wisdom is 30x your income, or less conservative, 25x your income.
I really would like to know how people think you need an income from your investments of $250k when retired. What on earth do you think you will be spending it on? That's our current household income with 2 kids, including saving a significant amount for retirement, kids college, and the random costs associated with kids. In 15 years we will have none of those costs/needs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought conventional wisdom says you need 10xs your income. So you need 2.5
You need how ever much you want to live on. You must budget and calculate how much you need (after taxes) yearly. Then work backwards and figure out where it will come from.
Be sure to include costs for medicare and all the supplemental healthcare/medications/etc. It's only cheap if you have low income. At $250k/year income, you will be paying $1k/person/month (or more). So figure out your costs and what you want to spend monthly and figure out where you can get that money---interest, dividends, SS, etc. Once you start using principal then you need to make sure it will last you until 90+
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought conventional wisdom says you need 10xs your income. So you need 2.5
No, conventional wisdom is 30x your income, or less conservative, 25x your income.
I really would like to know how people think you need an income from your investments of $250k when retired. What on earth do you think you will be spending it on? That's our current household income with 2 kids, including saving a significant amount for retirement, kids college, and the random costs associated with kids. In 15 years we will have none of those costs/needs.
Anonymous wrote:I thought conventional wisdom says you need 10xs your income. So you need 2.5
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought conventional wisdom says you need 10xs your income. So you need 2.5
No, conventional wisdom is 30x your income, or less conservative, 25x your income.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought conventional wisdom says you need 10xs your income. So you need 2.5
No, conventional wisdom is 30x your income, or less conservative, 25x your income.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought conventional wisdom says you need 10xs your income. So you need 2.5
No. It should be calculated with your expenses and not your income.
Anonymous wrote:I thought conventional wisdom says you need 10xs your income. So you need 2.5
Anonymous wrote:Most of the difference will come from growth in your portfolio. Even at a not-unreasonable 8% growth rate the investment will double in nine years even if you add nothing else (Rule of 72)