Anonymous wrote:She is really bad sorry Dems. I'm a Dem and despise Trump but quite honestly if you can't actually admit she's not a rock star you are in heavy denial or you've lost your mind. Just because she's better than Trump does not mean she's good. It just means she's not trash! She gets a D instead of F. Not sure it's really worth enthusiasm to cheer her as much as it's just a sigh of relief.

I mean if you objectively look at her political record, campaign victories and really peel back the layers to analyze her political acumen and strengths all she's got going for her is that Biden chose her as a DEI female candidate who could help him win his election.

For the record, I'm a female DEI business owner so please don't say it's because she's a DEI female candidate causing me to not be her fan. She's got really low energy and lower ability to communicate effectively.

Anonymous wrote:She is really bad sorry Dems. I'm a Dem and despise Trump but quite honestly if you can't actually admit she's not a rock star you are in heavy denial or you've lost your mind. Just because she's better than Trump does not mean she's good. It just means she's not trash! She gets a D instead of F. Not sure it's really worth enthusiasm to cheer her as much as it's just a sigh of relief.

I mean if you objectively look at her political record, campaign victories and really peel back the layers to analyze her political acumen and strengths all she's got going for her is that Biden chose her as a DEI female candidate who could help him win his election.

For the record, I'm a female DEI business owner so please don't say it's because she's a DEI female candidate causing me to not be her fan. She's got really low energy and lower ability to communicate effectively.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is really bad sorry Dems. I'm a Dem and despise Trump but quite honestly if you can't actually admit she's not a rock star you are in heavy denial or you've lost your mind. Just because she's better than Trump does not mean she's good. It just means she's not trash! She gets a D instead of F. Not sure it's really worth enthusiasm to cheer her as much as it's just a sigh of relief.

I mean if you objectively look at her political record, campaign victories and really peel back the layers to analyze her political acumen and strengths all she's got going for her is that Biden chose her as a DEI female candidate who could help him win his election.

For the record, I'm a female DEI business owner so please don't say it's because she's a DEI female candidate causing me to not be her fan. She's got really low energy and lower ability to communicate effectively.

Horse manure! Thus far she has communicated a hell of a lot better than your MAGA hero and garnering millions of votes from Republicans that will put her over the top in a landslide. If you are a Democrat then you're a Blue Dog Dem like Harry Byrd of VA decades ago who was as sexist and racist as your orange darling. You're jealous because you could never even aspire to come within a light year of her accomplishments.

Anonymous wrote:She is really bad sorry Dems. I'm a Dem and despise Trump but quite honestly if you can't actually admit she's not a rock star you are in heavy denial or you've lost your mind. Just because she's better than Trump does not mean she's good. It just means she's not trash! She gets a D instead of F. Not sure it's really worth enthusiasm to cheer her as much as it's just a sigh of relief.

I mean if you objectively look at her political record, campaign victories and really peel back the layers to analyze her political acumen and strengths all she's got going for her is that Biden chose her as a DEI female candidate who could help him win his election.

For the record, I'm a female DEI business owner so please don't say it's because she's a DEI female candidate causing me to not be her fan. She's got really low energy and lower ability to communicate effectively.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Next time, let’s have a real primary and trust the voters to put up the strongest candidate. You can try to put a brave face on this one, but the reality is that Kamala is a lousy politician.

How is she a lousy politician? She has more elections under her belt than either Trump or Vance. She has more experience in public officiant than Trump and Vance combined. What is lousy? Economists, save the Navarros of the world (when they're not in jail and barred from their electronics), believe his economic agenda could trigger a worldwide recession.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Serious question: Why isn't Kamala campaigning this week? For the second day in a row - 13 days before the election - no rallies, no appearances. Just prepping for short sit-down interviews.

I hate to be the one to put this out there, but - I think she's thrown in the towel. How else to read this?

OP, your enthusiasm is appreciated, but if the candidate doesn't have it, how can we?

She needs a lot of time to prep for interviews.

PP again. I get that, but why do interviews at all? I did just read that she declined Joe Rogan, so I think that's a good move.

She's clearly better at group events and rallies. I don't understand why she's not barnstorming the swing states like Trump is. She could easily do a couple of rallies each day in each swing state and that would do a lot to energize her campaign.

I seriously don't understand this decision.

Perhaps if you followed something other than Fox News and OAN, you would know she is barnstorming the swing states. That's pretty much all she is doing between media interviews. Trump has more holes in his schedule as he has cancelled all mainstream media after the disastrous Univision Town Hall coupled with the Bloomberg interview.

And she is not holding a rally in the LA coliseum a week before the election (Trump, MSG, 10/27).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Serious question: Why isn't Kamala campaigning this week? For the second day in a row - 13 days before the election - no rallies, no appearances. Just prepping for short sit-down interviews.

I hate to be the one to put this out there, but - I think she's thrown in the towel. How else to read this?

OP, your enthusiasm is appreciated, but if the candidate doesn't have it, how can we?

She needs a lot of time to prep for interviews.

PP again. I get that, but why do interviews at all? I did just read that she declined Joe Rogan, so I think that's a good move.

She's clearly better at group events and rallies. I don't understand why she's not barnstorming the swing states like Trump is. She could easily do a couple of rallies each day in each swing state and that would do a lot to energize her campaign.

I seriously don't understand this decision.

Anonymous wrote:She is really bad sorry Dems. I'm a Dem and despise Trump but quite honestly if you can't actually admit she's not a rock star you are in heavy denial or you've lost your mind. Just because she's better than Trump does not mean she's good. It just means she's not trash! She gets a D instead of F. Not sure it's really worth enthusiasm to cheer her as much as it's just a sigh of relief.

I mean if you objectively look at her political record, campaign victories and really peel back the layers to analyze her political acumen and strengths all she's got going for her is that Biden chose her as a DEI female candidate who could help him win his election.

For the record, I'm a female DEI business owner so please don't say it's because she's a DEI female candidate causing me to not be her fan. She's got really low energy and lower ability to communicate effectively.

Anonymous wrote:We are going to crush Donald Trump and the sickness he represents. There are more of us than there are of them. We are right. They are wrong. This is our moment. This is our destiny. Walk with confidence. Do not falter. Victory will be ours.

Arrogance is walking on the field, bragging you will win without having done the work. The Harris-Walz campaign and thousands of us volunteers are doing the hard work. We've earned it.

No team wins the Superbowl thinking, "We might have a shot." This is ours. Walk out and take it. We will look back at this moment with quiet pride and satisfaction for the rest of our lives knowing that when America called, we answered.

Inspired by Stuart Stevens.


I agree and have BELIEVED this from the moment Biden withdrew. The thousands of people lining up to register or vote early are doing it so they can cast their vote for Harris/Walz. Bill Gates donated FIFTY MILLION DOLLARS to the Harris campaign yesterday.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/bill-gates-donates-50-million-145318949.html

Anonymous wrote:She is really bad sorry Dems. I'm a Dem and despise Trump but quite honestly if you can't actually admit she's not a rock star you are in heavy denial or you've lost your mind. Just because she's better than Trump does not mean she's good. It just means she's not trash! She gets a D instead of F. Not sure it's really worth enthusiasm to cheer her as much as it's just a sigh of relief.

I mean if you objectively look at her political record, campaign victories and really peel back the layers to analyze her political acumen and strengths all she's got going for her is that Biden chose her as a DEI female candidate who could help him win his election.

For the record, I'm a female DEI business owner so please don't say it's because she's a DEI female candidate causing me to not be her fan. She's got really low energy and lower ability to communicate effectively.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Next time, let’s have a real primary and trust the voters to put up the strongest candidate. You can try to put a brave face on this one, but the reality is that Kamala is a lousy politician.

How is she a lousy politician? She has more elections under her belt than either Trump or Vance. She has more experience in public officiant than Trump and Vance combined. What is lousy? Economists, save the Navarros of the world (when they're not in jail and barred from their electronics), believe his economic agenda could trigger a worldwide recession.

She dropped out early in 2020 primary. She underperformed other Democrats when she ran for AG, winning by .8%.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Serious question: Why isn't Kamala campaigning this week? For the second day in a row - 13 days before the election - no rallies, no appearances. Just prepping for short sit-down interviews.

I hate to be the one to put this out there, but - I think she's thrown in the towel. How else to read this?

OP, your enthusiasm is appreciated, but if the candidate doesn't have it, how can we?

The double standard….

+100 she just said Trump was tired and needed rest then proceeds to take the day off. ok kamala!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Next time, let’s have a real primary and trust the voters to put up the strongest candidate. You can try to put a brave face on this one, but the reality is that Kamala is a lousy politician.

How is she a lousy politician? She has more elections under her belt than either Trump or Vance. She has more experience in public officiant than Trump and Vance combined. What is lousy? Economists, save the Navarros of the world (when they're not in jail and barred from their electronics), believe his economic agenda could trigger a worldwide recession.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Serious question: Why isn't Kamala campaigning this week? For the second day in a row - 13 days before the election - no rallies, no appearances. Just prepping for short sit-down interviews.

I hate to be the one to put this out there, but - I think she's thrown in the towel. How else to read this?

OP, your enthusiasm is appreciated, but if the candidate doesn't have it, how can we?

She needs a lot of time to prep for interviews.

PP again. I get that, but why do interviews at all? I did just read that she declined Joe Rogan, so I think that's a good move.

She's clearly better at group events and rallies. I don't understand why she's not barnstorming the swing states like Trump is. She could easily do a couple of rallies each day in each swing state and that would do a lot to energize her campaign.

I seriously don't understand this decision.

In retrospect it was probably a lot to expect of her to go from three years of low activity VP idleness to suddenly being thrust in the starring role and constantly campaigning. Three months in, she looks exhausted. And she’s looking at early voting numbers that look mostly bad.