Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the better question is would you rather be kid free from 25-35 or 45-55
In isolation of course only being 48 when you’re kid free sounds better than 60. But unless you have very spread out kids, it of course comes with a trade off of your younger years!
I had my first kid when I was 31 and my husband was 35. We were both very excited to be parents. I don’t have many Peter Pan friends who needed to endlessly live out bottomless brunches/bad dates/sad girls trips.
Hi Brunch granny!
I think you missed the point. We were both well adjusted enough in our 30s to not want to be Peter Pans. In our 50s we also have no desire to be Peter Pans. I’m going to be 61 when my oldest is 30 (the age that I got married) and 62 when she turns 31 (the age that I had her). I have no idea what life holds for us but if my kids end up having children in their early 30s like me I’m so exited about getting to be an active and involved grandparent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the better question is would you rather be kid free from 25-35 or 45-55
In isolation of course only being 48 when you’re kid free sounds better than 60. But unless you have very spread out kids, it of course comes with a trade off of your younger years!
I had my first kid when I was 31 and my husband was 35. We were both very excited to be parents. I don’t have many Peter Pan friends who needed to endlessly live out bottomless brunches/bad dates/sad girls trips.
Hi Brunch granny!
I think you missed the point. We were both well adjusted enough in our 30s to not want to be Peter Pans. In our 50s we also have no desire to be Peter Pans. I’m going to be 61 when my oldest is 30 (the age that I got married) and 62 when she turns 31 (the age that I had her). I have no idea what life holds for us but if my kids end up having children in their early 30s like me I’m so exited about getting to be an active and involved grandparent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the better question is would you rather be kid free from 25-35 or 45-55
In isolation of course only being 48 when you’re kid free sounds better than 60. But unless you have very spread out kids, it of course comes with a trade off of your younger years!
I had my first kid when I was 31 and my husband was 35. We were both very excited to be parents. I don’t have many Peter Pan friends who needed to endlessly live out bottomless brunches/bad dates/sad girls trips.
Hi Brunch granny!
I think you missed the point. We were both well adjusted enough in our 30s to not want to be Peter Pans. In our 50s we also have no desire to be Peter Pans. I’m going to be 61 when my oldest is 30 (the age that I got married) and 62 when she turns 31 (the age that I had her). I have no idea what life holds for us but if my kids end up having children in their early 30s like me I’m so exited about getting to be an active and involved grandparent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the better question is would you rather be kid free from 25-35 or 45-55
In isolation of course only being 48 when you’re kid free sounds better than 60. But unless you have very spread out kids, it of course comes with a trade off of your younger years!
I had my first kid when I was 31 and my husband was 35. We were both very excited to be parents. I don’t have many Peter Pan friends who needed to endlessly live out bottomless brunches/bad dates/sad girls trips.
Hi Brunch granny!
Anonymous wrote:The best age to be an empty nester is when all of your friends are starting to be empty nesters.
We are the first in our group and it's been really difficult to navigate. We only have one kid which might be a factor.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the better question is would you rather be kid free from 25-35 or 45-55
In isolation of course only being 48 when you’re kid free sounds better than 60. But unless you have very spread out kids, it of course comes with a trade off of your younger years!
I had my first kid when I was 31 and my husband was 35. We were both very excited to be parents. I don’t have many Peter Pan friends who needed to endlessly live out bottomless brunches/bad dates/sad girls trips.
Hi Brunch granny!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh look another thread shaming people for not being married and having kids by 25.
I give you folks credit you don't quit.
Old mom here. Nobody is shaming anyone. Just stop.
It is. This is straight out of the family values playbook. This is not a genuine post.
If it's supposed to shame me, it's not working. My honest to god reaction was geez I had zero clue who I was at 22 and was not ready to be a wife or a mom. But hats off to OP, everyone is on their own path.
I fully agree!
The ideal age to have children is any time you can have them with the right person (for you). The biggest decision any of us make isn't when to have children, it's who do we have them with.
Anonymous wrote:My H was an empty nester at 40. He loved it - he was still young and athletic enough, yet financially secure enough to hike, travel, pursue meaningful hobbies.
Then I came along and he started all over again with a baby at 43. Oops.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the better question is would you rather be kid free from 25-35 or 45-55
In isolation of course only being 48 when you’re kid free sounds better than 60. But unless you have very spread out kids, it of course comes with a trade off of your younger years!
I had my first kid when I was 31 and my husband was 35. We were both very excited to be parents. I don’t have many Peter Pan friends who needed to endlessly live out bottomless brunches/bad dates/sad girls trips.
Anonymous wrote:I think the better question is would you rather be kid free from 25-35 or 45-55
In isolation of course only being 48 when you’re kid free sounds better than 60. But unless you have very spread out kids, it of course comes with a trade off of your younger years!