Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It depends on so many factors. On our team our best players were put on defense and the worst was up at striker. The rationale was we'd stop other teams from scoring and someone, eventually, would get a goal.
We do this too! Our best hope is to keep game super low to no scoring . . . and maybe score a random goal here or there.
Yep if your best player is a fullback or goalie you do not have a good team.
Anonymous wrote:The 10 of course, followed closely by the 6 (far more unappreciated).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It depends on so many factors. On our team our best players were put on defense and the worst was up at striker. The rationale was we'd stop other teams from scoring and someone, eventually, would get a goal.
We do this too! Our best hope is to keep game super low to no scoring . . . and maybe score a random goal here or there.
Anonymous wrote:Depends on age
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It depends on so many factors. On our team our best players were put on defense and the worst was up at striker. The rationale was we'd stop other teams from scoring and someone, eventually, would get a goal.
We do this too! Our best hope is to keep game super low to no scoring . . . and maybe score a random goal here or there.
Anonymous wrote:It depends on so many factors. On our team our best players were put on defense and the worst was up at striker. The rationale was we'd stop other teams from scoring and someone, eventually, would get a goal.
Anonymous wrote:It depends on so many factors. On our team our best players were put on defense and the worst was up at striker. The rationale was we'd stop other teams from scoring and someone, eventually, would get a goal.
Anonymous wrote:Just curious if there is a trend or pattern. For the top three players on your kids team, what positions do they play?
Anonymous wrote:Better players are generally in the middle of the field as they generally the spine of the team.