Anonymous wrote:Other than the price, is there any downside to using RTF formula instead of the powder? I find it so convenient and I read it’s sterile compared to the powder. I guess you pay for the convenience? Anyone else exclusively use RTF past the newborn phase?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Either one is just powdered fructose sugar. Not healthy.
Have there been any advancements in recent years for healthy alternatives? Or are they all still bad?
For those of us who could not produce enough milk or whose babies could not nurse properly, formula is a miracle.
Anonymous wrote:Either one is just powdered fructose sugar. Not healthy.
Have there been any advancements in recent years for healthy alternatives? Or are they all still bad?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Either one is just powdered fructose sugar. Not healthy.
Have there been any advancements in recent years for healthy alternatives? Or are they all still bad?
Breastmilk is mostly water and sugar. So, formula designed to replicate breastmilk will always be mostly water and sugar. That is a feature not a bug.
There are some subtle advantages to breastmilk, especially early on. There are significant advantages to breastmilk for some populations like micropreemies, or people without consistent access to clean water, and significant advantages for formula for some populations like infants with galactosemia, and adoptive families. But for the vast majority of families, both are good safe choices.
"All sugar is the same!" ..... yeah, no.