Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stronger at science than math (ACT removes half the math and puts in science, compared to SAT)
Near perfect 1570 SAT is actually perfect 36 ACT.
The concordance table indicates so, but I wonder if 36 with perfect 36 subparts is distinguishable - as in, maybe 1570 = 36 where the subparts are 36, 35, 36, 35, but 1600 is equivalent to the 36 with perfect 36 subparts achievement?
Maybe, but the official concordance has a 36 ACT as a 1590 SAT. I don't think anyone analyzes beyond that.
https://www.act.org/content/dam/act/unsecured/documents/ACT-SAT-Concordance-Tables.pdf
Anyway, my kid took two practice tests of each. He was 1500-1550 on SAT practice and got 36s in both his ACT practice tests. Feeling the ACT was more of a sure thing, and didn't demand prep beyond an hour or so refreshing his memory on math formulas, he took that exam. Some kids just do a little better on one or the other. A few practice tests should give you a sense.
Anonymous wrote:NP: If a student already has a high score for SAT, does it matter to colleges if they also submit a high score for ACT? Conversely, if score is high for SAT and student wants to take ACT out of curiosity, will it hurt the applicant if the ACT ends up being lower or is there the option to not submit it (will colleges see you took the ACT but chose not to submit)? I'm asking b/c DC (junior) already has a high SAT score but wants to take the ACT too "for fun"
Anonymous wrote:NP: If a student already has a high score for SAT, does it matter to colleges if they also submit a high score for ACT? Conversely, if score is high for SAT and student wants to take ACT out of curiosity, will it hurt the applicant if the ACT ends up being lower or is there the option to not submit it (will colleges see you took the ACT but chose not to submit)? I'm asking b/c DC (junior) already has a high SAT score but wants to take the ACT too "for fun"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My advice is to have him prep this summer (more than 3 months of focused prep is unnecessary) - that way he is not juggling it with academic classes. The way to decide on which test is to take diagnostic practice tests of each - w/o any prep - and see which you do better on. If a tossup, I would personally choose the SAT, as it is digital and shorter. Then he can take the test for real in Oct or Nov of junior year, and has the opportunity to retake if necessary in December or March or May. I would not advise waiting until senior year to test.
This advice obviously comes from someone benefiting from unearned white / UMC privilege.
Everyone is dumping on you for pointing out the white privilege. I am curious how this is white privilege in the first place.
Test prep is not even close to being UMC privilege.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My advice is to have him prep this summer (more than 3 months of focused prep is unnecessary) - that way he is not juggling it with academic classes. The way to decide on which test is to take diagnostic practice tests of each - w/o any prep - and see which you do better on. If a tossup, I would personally choose the SAT, as it is digital and shorter. Then he can take the test for real in Oct or Nov of junior year, and has the opportunity to retake if necessary in December or March or May. I would not advise waiting until senior year to test.
This advice obviously comes from someone benefiting from unearned white / UMC privilege.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My advice is to have him prep this summer (more than 3 months of focused prep is unnecessary) - that way he is not juggling it with academic classes. The way to decide on which test is to take diagnostic practice tests of each - w/o any prep - and see which you do better on. If a tossup, I would personally choose the SAT, as it is digital and shorter. Then he can take the test for real in Oct or Nov of junior year, and has the opportunity to retake if necessary in December or March or May. I would not advise waiting until senior year to test.
This advice obviously comes from someone benefiting from unearned white / UMC privilege.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My advice is to have him prep this summer (more than 3 months of focused prep is unnecessary) - that way he is not juggling it with academic classes. The way to decide on which test is to take diagnostic practice tests of each - w/o any prep - and see which you do better on. If a tossup, I would personally choose the SAT, as it is digital and shorter. Then he can take the test for real in Oct or Nov of junior year, and has the opportunity to retake if necessary in December or March or May. I would not advise waiting until senior year to test.
This advice obviously comes from someone benefiting from unearned white / UMC privilege.