Anonymous wrote:Minneapolis
CNN
—
One state audit found that bonus checks intended for frontline workers during the pandemic were handed out to undeserving recipients. Another criticized a Minnesota state agency for failing to ensure there were no conflicts of interest in taxpayer-funded mental health and addiction programs. A third detailed lax oversight of a program to feed needy kids which federal prosecutors say resulted in the nation’s largest Covid-era fraud scheme.
But when confronted with these and other troubling examples of waste, fraud and abuse, some state agencies working under the administration of Democratic Gov. Tim Walz repeatedly minimized or dismissed the allegations, the state’s nonpartisan auditor, Judy Randall, told CNN.
A CNN review of audits – and the responses they prompted – as well as interviews with statewide politicians and pundits, found that Walz has been a hands-off leader when it comes to seeking accountability for episodes of fraud and mismanagement on his watch. What’s more, some state agencies headed by his appointees have responded defensively in recent months to the audits – a dynamic that Randall, who has worked in the department for 26 years, has found surprising.
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/10/04/politics/walz-audits-fraud-accountability-invs
Walz has presided over shocking amounts of fraud, waste and abuse as governor. Even CNN is finding very troubling patterns in MN, and pointing out that Walz is actively ignoring these problems.
Why is he considered a good leader if his performance as chief executive of MN is so bad?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did Walz benefit from the fraud? Because in Trump's case, the answer is yes, Trump befitted directly from fraud. That is so much worse than having fraud by a few bureaucrats happen on your watch.
So is that the rule now? Unless a politician personally benefits from fraud, the politician's incompetence, turning a blind eye, or cover up are no longer fair game?
This is such a boring story. You can do the same for every single state in the U.S., red and blue. Everybody knows that, which is why you'll get zero traction with it.
+1 Every state has fraud, including red states. News is chock full of such stories.
The biggest fraud, however, is Trump. Everyone else pales in comparison.
Please explain. Also, I thought NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW?
No one is above the law, indeed. But Walz is not a criminal here. There is crime apparently happening under his watch, which is in stark contrast to Trump, who is the criminal himself. Get it?
Nope. If they tried Trump, Walz should be tried as well.
There is no equivalency here. Walz’s situation =|= Trump’s situation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did Walz benefit from the fraud? Because in Trump's case, the answer is yes, Trump befitted directly from fraud. That is so much worse than having fraud by a few bureaucrats happen on your watch.
So is that the rule now? Unless a politician personally benefits from fraud, the politician's incompetence, turning a blind eye, or cover up are no longer fair game?
This is such a boring story. You can do the same for every single state in the U.S., red and blue. Everybody knows that, which is why you'll get zero traction with it.
+1 Every state has fraud, including red states. News is chock full of such stories.
The biggest fraud, however, is Trump. Everyone else pales in comparison.
Please explain. Also, I thought NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW?
No one is above the law, indeed. But Walz is not a criminal here. There is crime apparently happening under his watch, which is in stark contrast to Trump, who is the criminal himself. Get it?
Nope. If they tried Trump, Walz should be tried as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did Walz benefit from the fraud? Because in Trump's case, the answer is yes, Trump befitted directly from fraud. That is so much worse than having fraud by a few bureaucrats happen on your watch.
So is that the rule now? Unless a politician personally benefits from fraud, the politician's incompetence, turning a blind eye, or cover up are no longer fair game?
This is such a boring story. You can do the same for every single state in the U.S., red and blue. Everybody knows that, which is why you'll get zero traction with it.
+1 Every state has fraud, including red states. News is chock full of such stories.
The biggest fraud, however, is Trump. Everyone else pales in comparison.
Please explain. Also, I thought NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW?
No one is above the law, indeed. But Walz is not a criminal here. There is crime apparently happening under his watch, which is in stark contrast to Trump, who is the criminal himself. Get it?
Nope. If they tried Trump, Walz should be tried as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did Walz benefit from the fraud? Because in Trump's case, the answer is yes, Trump befitted directly from fraud. That is so much worse than having fraud by a few bureaucrats happen on your watch.
So is that the rule now? Unless a politician personally benefits from fraud, the politician's incompetence, turning a blind eye, or cover up are no longer fair game?
This is such a boring story. You can do the same for every single state in the U.S., red and blue. Everybody knows that, which is why you'll get zero traction with it.
+1 Every state has fraud, including red states. News is chock full of such stories.
The biggest fraud, however, is Trump. Everyone else pales in comparison.
Please explain. Also, I thought NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW?
No one is above the law, indeed. But Walz is not a criminal here. There is crime apparently happening under his watch, which is in stark contrast to Trump, who is the criminal himself. Get it?
Nope. If they tried Trump, Walz should be tried as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Omg they’re grasping at straws.
CNN is grasping at straws?
Why do you think the fraud uncovered under Walz in MN is not important?
There's literally federal monies fraud in all 50 states - taxes, COVID funds, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, veterans' benefits, etc.
Waste and fraud is a FEATURE of all these programs because scamsters are attracted to getting government money. Ask Senator Rick Scott.
A CNN review of audits – and the responses they prompted – as well as interviews with statewide politicians and pundits, found that Walz has been a hands-off leader when it comes to seeking accountability for episodes of fraud and mismanagement on his watch. What’s more, some state agencies headed by his appointees have responded defensively in recent months to the audits – a dynamic that Randall, who has worked in the department for 26 years, has found surprising.
“They’ve been emboldened because they’ve got the cover,” Koran said. “They believe they’re untouchable.”
Some nonpartisan political observers in Minnesota say there’s truth to the complaints.
Dan Myers, an associate professor of political science at the University of Minnesota, said Democrats’ so-called trifecta in state government has likely hindered efforts to get clear answers into what went wrong in certain cases of fraud and waste.
“There has been less digging into that than there almost certainly would be if Republicans had had one more seat in the state Senate,” he said.
Ah- this mirrors the attitudes of democrats posting here: it’s ok if it’s us. ✅
then the state AG should uncover it and charge for the crimes. No one is suggesting otherwise.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did Walz benefit from the fraud? Because in Trump's case, the answer is yes, Trump befitted directly from fraud. That is so much worse than having fraud by a few bureaucrats happen on your watch.
So is that the rule now? Unless a politician personally benefits from fraud, the politician's incompetence, turning a blind eye, or cover up are no longer fair game?
This is such a boring story. You can do the same for every single state in the U.S., red and blue. Everybody knows that, which is why you'll get zero traction with it.
+1 Every state has fraud, including red states. News is chock full of such stories.
The biggest fraud, however, is Trump. Everyone else pales in comparison.
Please explain. Also, I thought NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW?
No one is above the law, indeed. But Walz is not a criminal here. There is crime apparently happening under his watch, which is in stark contrast to Trump, who is the criminal himself. Get it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Omg they’re grasping at straws.
CNN is grasping at straws?
Why do you think the fraud uncovered under Walz in MN is not important?
There's literally federal monies fraud in all 50 states - taxes, COVID funds, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, veterans' benefits, etc.
Waste and fraud is a FEATURE of all these programs because scamsters are attracted to getting government money. Ask Senator Rick Scott.
A CNN review of audits – and the responses they prompted – as well as interviews with statewide politicians and pundits, found that Walz has been a hands-off leader when it comes to seeking accountability for episodes of fraud and mismanagement on his watch. What’s more, some state agencies headed by his appointees have responded defensively in recent months to the audits – a dynamic that Randall, who has worked in the department for 26 years, has found surprising.
“They’ve been emboldened because they’ve got the cover,” Koran said. “They believe they’re untouchable.”
Some nonpartisan political observers in Minnesota say there’s truth to the complaints.
Dan Myers, an associate professor of political science at the University of Minnesota, said Democrats’ so-called trifecta in state government has likely hindered efforts to get clear answers into what went wrong in certain cases of fraud and waste.
“There has been less digging into that than there almost certainly would be if Republicans had had one more seat in the state Senate,” he said.
Ah- this mirrors the attitudes of democrats posting here: it’s ok if it’s us. ✅
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did Walz benefit from the fraud? Because in Trump's case, the answer is yes, Trump befitted directly from fraud. That is so much worse than having fraud by a few bureaucrats happen on your watch.
So is that the rule now? Unless a politician personally benefits from fraud, the politician's incompetence, turning a blind eye, or cover up are no longer fair game?
This is such a boring story. You can do the same for every single state in the U.S., red and blue. Everybody knows that, which is why you'll get zero traction with it.
+1 Every state has fraud, including red states. News is chock full of such stories.
The biggest fraud, however, is Trump. Everyone else pales in comparison.
Please explain. Also, I thought NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did Walz benefit from the fraud? Because in Trump's case, the answer is yes, Trump befitted directly from fraud. That is so much worse than having fraud by a few bureaucrats happen on your watch.
So is that the rule now? Unless a politician personally benefits from fraud, the politician's incompetence, turning a blind eye, or cover up are no longer fair game?
This is such a boring story. You can do the same for every single state in the U.S., red and blue. Everybody knows that, which is why you'll get zero traction with it.
+1 Every state has fraud, including red states. News is chock full of such stories.
The biggest fraud, however, is Trump. Everyone else pales in comparison.
Except this thread is based specifically off of a news report from CNN about MN’s fraud and Walz refusing to acknowledge it or do anything about it.
Allegations of waste and abuse have hit Minnesota state agencies. Critics say Gov. Tim Walz hasn’t done enough to stop it. CNN’s Kyung Lah reports.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/04/politics/video/invs-walz-criticism-state-fraud-scandals
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did Walz benefit from the fraud? Because in Trump's case, the answer is yes, Trump befitted directly from fraud. That is so much worse than having fraud by a few bureaucrats happen on your watch.
So is that the rule now? Unless a politician personally benefits from fraud, the politician's incompetence, turning a blind eye, or cover up are no longer fair game?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Omg they’re grasping at straws.
CNN is grasping at straws?
Why do you think the fraud uncovered under Walz in MN is not important?
There's literally federal monies fraud in all 50 states - taxes, COVID funds, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, veterans' benefits, etc.
Waste and fraud is a FEATURE of all these programs because scamsters are attracted to getting government money. Ask Senator Rick Scott.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Omg they’re grasping at straws.
CNN is grasping at straws?
Why do you think the fraud uncovered under Walz in MN is not important?