Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We went to SMCS open house yesterday. Last year 900 applied; they accepted 140 and 127 enrolled. Their yield is above Harvard's.
Did they explain why they took so many more this year? Usually there are only 100 places.
Anonymous wrote:We went to SMCS open house yesterday. Last year 900 applied; they accepted 140 and 127 enrolled. Their yield is above Harvard's.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So does the essay even matter? Seems like if you have a high MAP score you get in to all…
Most people with high scores can write decent essays.
Someone tossed out a number that 800 people apply to 100 seats in magnet. When you consider people applying to 2 or 3 magnets, and people declining invites, you end up with a pretty high acceptance rate for applications.
Really? How does that math work out, exactly?
Let's take the 3 most selective magnets - SMCS, IB, and Eco. 100 attendees each, 800 applications each, but each applicant applies to average of 2 programs. That's 300 seats for 1200 kids. Now figure some kids stay at homeschool after getting admitted, so the number of admits is even higher
Eco is not relevant and is much less selective. Over 1000 applies to IB and over 800 to Blair. Assuming one kid applies to 1.5 programs, you get 1200 kids for 200 seats - 1/6 i.e. more selective than most colleges. Very few stay at their base schools, especially for Blair. There is almost no movement on the WL.
Anonymous wrote:The level of competitiveness really varies widely by magnet. Most kids we know applied to all 3. Very few got in first round to any of them and usually the ones we know who got in got in to 2/3 or 3/3.
SMCS at Blair is like Harvard. The yield is crazy. RMIB has good yield too but tons of kids get off the wait list for that because so many of those kids end up going to Blair. Poolesville is similar. Many of those kid are choosing between Poolesville and other magnets.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So does the essay even matter? Seems like if you have a high MAP score you get in to all…
Most people with high scores can write decent essays.
Someone tossed out a number that 800 people apply to 100 seats in magnet. When you consider people applying to 2 or 3 magnets, and people declining invites, you end up with a pretty high acceptance rate for applications.
Really? How does that math work out, exactly?
Let's take the 3 most selective magnets - SMCS, IB, and Eco. 100 attendees each, 800 applications each, but each applicant applies to average of 2 programs. That's 300 seats for 1200 kids. Now figure some kids stay at homeschool after getting admitted, so the number of admits is even higher
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So does the essay even matter? Seems like if you have a high MAP score you get in to all…
Most people with high scores can write decent essays.
Someone tossed out a number that 800 people apply to 100 seats in magnet. When you consider people applying to 2 or 3 magnets, and people declining invites, you end up with a pretty high acceptance rate for applications.
Really? How does that math work out, exactly?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid had 274 MAP M and 243 MAP R. Got accepted to both global ecology and SMACS and ended up taking SMACS.
Do they consider MAP R For SMACS ?
Anonymous wrote:So does the essay even matter? Seems like if you have a high MAP score you get in to all…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So does the essay even matter? Seems like if you have a high MAP score you get in to all…
Most people with high scores can write decent essays.
Someone tossed out a number that 800 people apply to 100 seats in magnet. When you consider people applying to 2 or 3 magnets, and people declining invites, you end up with a pretty high acceptance rate for applications.
Anonymous wrote:So does the essay even matter? Seems like if you have a high MAP score you get in to all…