Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Conservatives are not about labor rights. They are about INDIVIDUAL rights.

Surprised you haven't got this. It's pretty basic. You know... nation of laws, not of men. Separation of Powers, Equal Protection, Private Property Rights, Due Process, Federalism, etc.

Liberals are all about state power over individuals. Conservatives are all about individual power over the state and not letting it get out of control, like it has today.

BTW, very few people were anti-vaccine until they started pushing mRNA vaccines rather than conventional recombinant and conjugate vaccines.

You're probably of this mondset that "newer is always better". Well, it isn't, especially when you're injecting things into people. Got it?

Finally, when I see MANDATES, I immediately want to fight them. If things are good, they'll sell themselves. If you have to have a bureaucrat standing over me, forcing me or threatening my livelihood to get what you want, then you have a fight on your hands.

That's where democrats fail. They lecture and cajole, but when people say no, then they move to coercion to get their way.

Your right for your child to die from a communicable disease stops where my child’s right to live is concerned.

If you don’t want to vaccinate your children against diseases that historically used to kill them then you keep your child at home to teach them yourself or you send them to a private school with other kids whose parents don’t want them inoculated against deadly diseases and they can all fester together.

If your kid is vaccinated, then what do you have to worry about with unvaccinated kids?

I guess you STILL don't understand how vaccines work and what they can, and cannot do.

Feel free to enlighten me. What exactly do vaccines do? How much protection do they give and for how long?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Conservatives are not about labor rights. They are about INDIVIDUAL rights.

Surprised you haven't got this. It's pretty basic. You know... nation of laws, not of men. Separation of Powers, Equal Protection, Private Property Rights, Due Process, Federalism, etc.

Liberals are all about state power over individuals. Conservatives are all about individual power over the state and not letting it get out of control, like it has today.

BTW, very few people were anti-vaccine until they started pushing mRNA vaccines rather than conventional recombinant and conjugate vaccines.

You're probably of this mondset that "newer is always better". Well, it isn't, especially when you're injecting things into people. Got it?

Finally, when I see MANDATES, I immediately want to fight them. If things are good, they'll sell themselves. If you have to have a bureaucrat standing over me, forcing me or threatening my livelihood to get what you want, then you have a fight on your hands.

That's where democrats fail. They lecture and cajole, but when people say no, then they move to coercion to get their way.

So would you say autonomy over one's body is something conservatives would fight to enshrine into law??

NP here - and a woman. Abortion is not solely an issue of autonomy over one's body because it also involves killing your offspring. As much as you seem to want it to be, it's not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Nope. Really is that simple

You are either disingenuous or obtuse. Abortion is not a "my body, my choice" situation like vaccine mandates. Abortion involves two bodies, so abortion is favoring the convenience of one body over the actual life of the other, hence why many are against abortion.

Now, with that said, I could see how some view vaccines the same way, so in that sense, maybe they are related, but not in the way you would suggest.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Conservatives are not about labor rights. They are about INDIVIDUAL rights.

Surprised you haven't got this. It's pretty basic. You know... nation of laws, not of men. Separation of Powers, Equal Protection, Private Property Rights, Due Process, Federalism, etc.

Liberals are all about state power over individuals. Conservatives are all about individual power over the state and not letting it get out of control, like it has today.

BTW, very few people were anti-vaccine until they started pushing mRNA vaccines rather than conventional recombinant and conjugate vaccines.

You're probably of this mondset that "newer is always better". Well, it isn't, especially when you're injecting things into people. Got it?

Finally, when I see MANDATES, I immediately want to fight them. If things are good, they'll sell themselves. If you have to have a bureaucrat standing over me, forcing me or threatening my livelihood to get what you want, then you have a fight on your hands.

That's where democrats fail. They lecture and cajole, but when people say no, then they move to coercion to get their way.

Your right for your child to die from a communicable disease stops where my child’s right to live is concerned.

If you don’t want to vaccinate your children against diseases that historically used to kill them then you keep your child at home to teach them yourself or you send them to a private school with other kids whose parents don’t want them inoculated against deadly diseases and they can all fester together.

If your kid is vaccinated, then what do you have to worry about with unvaccinated kids?

I guess you STILL don't understand how vaccines work and what they can, and cannot do.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Conservatives are not about labor rights. They are about INDIVIDUAL rights.

Surprised you haven't got this. It's pretty basic. You know... nation of laws, not of men. Separation of Powers, Equal Protection, Private Property Rights, Due Process, Federalism, etc.

Liberals are all about state power over individuals. Conservatives are all about individual power over the state and not letting it get out of control, like it has today.

BTW, very few people were anti-vaccine until they started pushing mRNA vaccines rather than conventional recombinant and conjugate vaccines.

You're probably of this mondset that "newer is always better". Well, it isn't, especially when you're injecting things into people. Got it?

Finally, when I see MANDATES, I immediately want to fight them. If things are good, they'll sell themselves. If you have to have a bureaucrat standing over me, forcing me or threatening my livelihood to get what you want, then you have a fight on your hands.

That's where democrats fail. They lecture and cajole, but when people say no, then they move to coercion to get their way.

So would you say autonomy over one's body is something conservatives would fight to enshrine into law??

NP here - and a woman. Abortion is not solely an issue of autonomy over one's body because it also involves killing your offspring. As much as you seem to want it to be, it's not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Nope. Really is that simple

You are either disingenuous or obtuse. Abortion is not a "my body, my choice" situation like vaccine mandates. Abortion involves two bodies, so abortion is favoring the convenience of one body over the actual life of the other, hence why many are against abortion.

Now, with that said, I could see how some view vaccines the same way, so in that sense, maybe they are related, but not in the way you would suggest.

The bolded is your opinion. If you believe then don't have an abortion. You don't have the right to impose your opinion on to others.

Anonymous wrote:The democrats:

- ideas so good, they’re mandatory. Like in North Korea.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Conservatives are not about labor rights. They are about INDIVIDUAL rights.

Surprised you haven't got this. It's pretty basic. You know... nation of laws, not of men. Separation of Powers, Equal Protection, Private Property Rights, Due Process, Federalism, etc.

Liberals are all about state power over individuals. Conservatives are all about individual power over the state and not letting it get out of control, like it has today.

BTW, very few people were anti-vaccine until they started pushing mRNA vaccines rather than conventional recombinant and conjugate vaccines.

You're probably of this mondset that "newer is always better". Well, it isn't, especially when you're injecting things into people. Got it?

Finally, when I see MANDATES, I immediately want to fight them. If things are good, they'll sell themselves. If you have to have a bureaucrat standing over me, forcing me or threatening my livelihood to get what you want, then you have a fight on your hands.

That's where democrats fail. They lecture and cajole, but when people say no, then they move to coercion to get their way.

So would you say autonomy over one's body is something conservatives would fight to enshrine into law??

NP here - and a woman. Abortion is not solely an issue of autonomy over one's body because it also involves killing your offspring. As much as you seem to want it to be, it's not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Nope. Really is that simple

You are either disingenuous or obtuse. Abortion is not a "my body, my choice" situation like vaccine mandates. Abortion involves two bodies, so abortion is favoring the convenience of one body over the actual life of the other, hence why many are against abortion.

Now, with that said, I could see how some view vaccines the same way, so in that sense, maybe they are related, but not in the way you would suggest.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Conservatives are not about labor rights. They are about INDIVIDUAL rights.

Surprised you haven't got this. It's pretty basic. You know... nation of laws, not of men. Separation of Powers, Equal Protection, Private Property Rights, Due Process, Federalism, etc.

Liberals are all about state power over individuals. Conservatives are all about individual power over the state and not letting it get out of control, like it has today.

BTW, very few people were anti-vaccine until they started pushing mRNA vaccines rather than conventional recombinant and conjugate vaccines.

You're probably of this mondset that "newer is always better". Well, it isn't, especially when you're injecting things into people. Got it?

Finally, when I see MANDATES, I immediately want to fight them. If things are good, they'll sell themselves. If you have to have a bureaucrat standing over me, forcing me or threatening my livelihood to get what you want, then you have a fight on your hands.

That's where democrats fail. They lecture and cajole, but when people say no, then they move to coercion to get their way.

So would you say autonomy over one's body is something conservatives would fight to enshrine into law??

NP here - and a woman. Abortion is not solely an issue of autonomy over one's body because it also involves killing your offspring. As much as you seem to want it to be, it's not an apples-to-apples comparison.

Nope. Really is that simple

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Conservatives are not about labor rights. They are about INDIVIDUAL rights.

Surprised you haven't got this. It's pretty basic. You know... nation of laws, not of men. Separation of Powers, Equal Protection, Private Property Rights, Due Process, Federalism, etc.

Liberals are all about state power over individuals. Conservatives are all about individual power over the state and not letting it get out of control, like it has today.

BTW, very few people were anti-vaccine until they started pushing mRNA vaccines rather than conventional recombinant and conjugate vaccines.

You're probably of this mondset that "newer is always better". Well, it isn't, especially when you're injecting things into people. Got it?

Finally, when I see MANDATES, I immediately want to fight them. If things are good, they'll sell themselves. If you have to have a bureaucrat standing over me, forcing me or threatening my livelihood to get what you want, then you have a fight on your hands.

That's where democrats fail. They lecture and cajole, but when people say no, then they move to coercion to get their way.

Your right for your child to die from a communicable disease stops where my child’s right to live is concerned.

If you don’t want to vaccinate your children against diseases that historically used to kill them then you keep your child at home to teach them yourself or you send them to a private school with other kids whose parents don’t want them inoculated against deadly diseases and they can all fester together.

If your kid is vaccinated, then what do you have to worry about with unvaccinated kids?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because conservatives are rightly skeptical of vaccine efficacy and safety.

Can anyone argue that the expanded vaccine mandates forced on kids today have made them any healthier than the more minimal vaccine schedules used on older generations?

Are any older people rushing out to get the vaccines they missed out on?

Polio? Tetanus? Diptheria? Ya, fun times.

Those were all covered by the vaccine schedule in the 1950s. Kids get 36+ vaccines now depending on how you count things. What benefit has then been from these additional 33+ vaccines that are required now but weren't before?

Maybe if you roll back the schedule to just your three examples, you wouldn't has nearly as much resistence.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Conservatives are not about labor rights. They are about INDIVIDUAL rights.

Surprised you haven't got this. It's pretty basic. You know... nation of laws, not of men. Separation of Powers, Equal Protection, Private Property Rights, Due Process, Federalism, etc.

Liberals are all about state power over individuals. Conservatives are all about individual power over the state and not letting it get out of control, like it has today.

BTW, very few people were anti-vaccine until they started pushing mRNA vaccines rather than conventional recombinant and conjugate vaccines.

You're probably of this mondset that "newer is always better". Well, it isn't, especially when you're injecting things into people. Got it?

Finally, when I see MANDATES, I immediately want to fight them. If things are good, they'll sell themselves. If you have to have a bureaucrat standing over me, forcing me or threatening my livelihood to get what you want, then you have a fight on your hands.

That's where democrats fail. They lecture and cajole, but when people say no, then they move to coercion to get their way.

Your right for your child to die from a communicable disease stops where my child’s right to live is concerned.

If you don’t want to vaccinate your children against diseases that historically used to kill them then you keep your child at home to teach them yourself or you send them to a private school with other kids whose parents don’t want them inoculated against deadly diseases and they can all fester together.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Conservatives are not about labor rights. They are about INDIVIDUAL rights.

Surprised you haven't got this. It's pretty basic. You know... nation of laws, not of men. Separation of Powers, Equal Protection, Private Property Rights, Due Process, Federalism, etc.

Liberals are all about state power over individuals. Conservatives are all about individual power over the state and not letting it get out of control, like it has today.

BTW, very few people were anti-vaccine until they started pushing mRNA vaccines rather than conventional recombinant and conjugate vaccines.

You're probably of this mondset that "newer is always better". Well, it isn't, especially when you're injecting things into people. Got it?

Finally, when I see MANDATES, I immediately want to fight them. If things are good, they'll sell themselves. If you have to have a bureaucrat standing over me, forcing me or threatening my livelihood to get what you want, then you have a fight on your hands.

That's where democrats fail. They lecture and cajole, but when people say no, then they move to coercion to get their way.

Your right for your child to die from a communicable disease stops where my child’s right to live is concerned.

If you don’t want to vaccinate your children against diseases that historically used to kill them then you keep your child at home to teach them yourself or you send them to a private school with other kids whose parents don’t want them inoculated against deadly diseases and they can all fester together.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because conservatives are rightly skeptical of vaccine efficacy and safety.

Can anyone argue that the expanded vaccine mandates forced on kids today have made them any healthier than the more minimal vaccine schedules used on older generations?

Are any older people rushing out to get the vaccines they missed out on?

Polio? Tetanus? Diptheria? Ya, fun times.

Anonymous wrote:Conservatives are not about labor rights. They are about INDIVIDUAL rights.

Surprised you haven't got this. It's pretty basic. You know... nation of laws, not of men. Separation of Powers, Equal Protection, Private Property Rights, Due Process, Federalism, etc.

Liberals are all about state power over individuals. Conservatives are all about individual power over the state and not letting it get out of control, like it has today.

BTW, very few people were anti-vaccine until they started pushing mRNA vaccines rather than conventional recombinant and conjugate vaccines.

You're probably of this mondset that "newer is always better". Well, it isn't, especially when you're injecting things into people. Got it?

Finally, when I see MANDATES, I immediately want to fight them. If things are good, they'll sell themselves. If you have to have a bureaucrat standing over me, forcing me or threatening my livelihood to get what you want, then you have a fight on your hands.

That's where democrats fail. They lecture and cajole, but when people say no, then they move to coercion to get their way.