Anonymous wrote:US News is the only place anyone looks for how good a school is.
In fact, my child is applying to UC Merced, which is basically one of the Top 50 schools in the entire country according to US News..
Now Merced has an acceptance rate of 90% and a yield rate of 9%, and the last time SAT's were reported, it had 25% of their students scoring below a 990. It's SAT average was 1080.
But everyone knows the data lies and US News speaks truth to power.
So we are all in on UC Merced. GO BOBCATS!!! It is Stanford's new rival!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
https://thesandb.com/48353/article/grinnell-college-ranking-us-news-liberal-arts/
Grinnell College has dropped eight places in the U.S. News & World Report’s ranking of Best National Liberal Arts Colleges in 2025. The report ranked the College nineteenth, whereas last year’s report ranked Grinnell eleventh in the category.
Now.. they along with Oberlin will crib that ranking doesn't matter
Do these rankings mean that much? They change methodologies and priorities so often that they seem so meaningless now? They'll probably many more times before your kid graduates too.
From my understanding, USNWR starting prioritizing "social mobility" as a major factor. So if a college has a lot of 1st gen students who have huge percentage change in upward mobility that is considered better than having a lot of kids who are already in a good place stay where they are.
I think these factors and priorities will keep changing with trends so it's best to read them but not really put all your weight on it. It doesn't help my kid from deteriming "best fit" at all since they care about a set of factors that USNWR doesn't necessarily prioritize in their rankings (good teachers, mentors, engaging classes, motivated but relaxed peer group, distance from home, etc.).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
https://thesandb.com/48353/article/grinnell-college-ranking-us-news-liberal-arts/
Grinnell College has dropped eight places in the U.S. News & World Report’s ranking of Best National Liberal Arts Colleges in 2025. The report ranked the College nineteenth, whereas last year’s report ranked Grinnell eleventh in the category.
Now.. they along with Oberlin will crib that ranking doesn't matter
What's a Grinnell?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ve been impressed by every Grinnell graduate I’ve met, and will no doubt continue to be.
I know two Grinnell graduates, and they are both mad as march hares.
Anonymous wrote:
https://thesandb.com/48353/article/grinnell-college-ranking-us-news-liberal-arts/
Grinnell College has dropped eight places in the U.S. News & World Report’s ranking of Best National Liberal Arts Colleges in 2025. The report ranked the College nineteenth, whereas last year’s report ranked Grinnell eleventh in the category.
Now.. they along with Oberlin will crib that ranking doesn't matter
Anonymous wrote:
https://thesandb.com/48353/article/grinnell-college-ranking-us-news-liberal-arts/
Grinnell College has dropped eight places in the U.S. News & World Report’s ranking of Best National Liberal Arts Colleges in 2025. The report ranked the College nineteenth, whereas last year’s report ranked Grinnell eleventh in the category.
Now.. they along with Oberlin will crib that ranking doesn't matter
Anonymous wrote:I don't really follow SLACs, but there is nothing different about Grinnell to justify a drop from 11 to 19. US News seems to really penalize wealthy private schools that give out exceptionally good financial aid - which I gather describes Grinnell
Anonymous wrote:I’ve been impressed by every Grinnell graduate I’ve met, and will no doubt continue to be.
Anonymous wrote:I don't really follow SLACs, but there is nothing different about Grinnell to justify a drop from 11 to 19. US News seems to really penalize wealthy private schools that give out exceptionally good financial aid - which I gather describes Grinnell. The ranking methodolgy prioritizes federal aid, particularly Pell Grants, and first generation students. And doesn't include class size, years to graduate, qualifications of professors, percentage of alumni that donate, and all the other things that generally give a better indication of the overall college experience for students. None of those things are measured anymore.
Chasing a US News ranking has become a pointless game for most colleges. US News is basically an advocacy group now. They aren't even trying to measure the "best colleges and universities" anymore. For the vast majority of families these days, US News isn't that useful.
Anonymous wrote:Putting aside the inherent problems and silliness of the rankings, it seems like the LACs in the 10 to 20-ish range are particularly susceptible to multi-school ties and large reshufflings. Grinnell and Middlebury went from 11 to 19. Smith went from 11 to 16 to 14 in the past three years. And so on. Even if you believe such rankings are gospel, I think it's fair to conclude that the LACs in this general band are extremely similar and not really amenable to a rigid ranking scheme. Thus even tiny changes to USNWR's methodology cause a lot of reshuffling.
Of course, as an evergreen reminder, these colleges, their students, or the educational experiences they offer do not materially change from year to year. Grinnell is the same school in 2024 ranked #19 as it was last year ranked #11.