Anonymous wrote:If you have a disparity in financial success between your children and you have one kid who struggles while the other is stable or even highly successful, is there anything wrong with giving more financial support to the less successful one?
I have a highly successful son and another moderately successful daughter, with another son with a bit of an unstable life. I helped him out by paying his rent for a year and purchasing a car and now my other two children are acting passive aggressive about it which I find unnecessary since they don’t need the money at all. I know how much they make and how much they have saved (I don’t ask, they tell me).
Anonymous wrote:If you have a disparity in financial success between your children and you have one kid who struggles while the other is stable or even highly successful, is there anything wrong with giving more financial support to the less successful one?
I have a highly successful son and another moderately successful daughter, with another son with a bit of an unstable life. I helped him out by paying his rent for a year and purchasing a car and now my other two children are acting passive aggressive about it which I find unnecessary since they don’t need the money at all. I know how much they make and how much they have saved (I don’t ask, they tell me).
Anonymous wrote:If one kid was in big law and the other a public school teacher, then it'd be fine to give the teacher more. But if one is a bum who chooses to work a part time job sometimes and smoke up the other times, while another child works their ass off, then it wouldn't be fine to give the bum more.
Anonymous wrote:If one kid was in big law and the other a public school teacher, then it'd be fine to give the teacher more. But if one is a bum who chooses to work a part time job sometimes and smoke up the other times, while another child works their ass off, then it wouldn't be fine to give the bum more.
Anonymous wrote:If one kid was in big law and the other a public school teacher, then it'd be fine to give the teacher more. But if one is a bum who chooses to work a part time job sometimes and smoke up the other times, while another child works their ass off, then it wouldn't be fine to give the bum more.
If one kid was in big law and the other a public school teacher, then it'd be fine to give the teacher more. But if one is a bum who chooses to work a part time job sometimes and smoke up the other times, while another child works their ass off, then it wouldn't be fine to give the bum more.
Anonymous wrote:You’re rewarding the slacker. And holding it against the kids who have done well on their own. And unless they are Bezos, yes, they could prob use help to lighten their load. But you do t help them and they rightfully resent it.
Anonymous wrote:You're enabling the failure to launch son. Buying a car and paying his rent for a first year is a glaring example, but there's no chance it's the first instance of you coddling him and punishing your other kids for their competence.
They're telling you how well they're doing because they're seeking your approval, but you are seeking a codependent relationship with the baby so you see it as bragging. Kids that don't need you as adults are a sign of your success but you're holding it against them. They're not passive aggressive, they're giving up on having a healthy relationship with you.