Anonymous wrote:Nasty. Next thing you know there are needles on the street and liquor bottles.
Anonymous wrote:No, neighborhood litter is a good reason to move. Why would you want to live in that environment? Also suggests that you are surrounded by people who just don’t care about the neighborhood.
Anonymous wrote:Litter has very little to do with poverty. It has everything to do with mental sickness and poor breeding.
Anonymous wrote:Ugh, commuting this morning I watched someone toss a banana peel out the window onto the street. Mercedes with VA plates. Some people just weren't raised right, money or not.
Anonymous wrote:I would move. Not because of the litter but because your neighbors are people that litter or your neighborhood is so full of transients and loitering.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I cleaned up our block regularly when I lived in the city. Now that we're in the boring burbs, it's a non-issue.
Depends where you live in the city. NW DC is far cleaner than the rest. You don't see tons of litter in Kent.
I was in NWDC, but the high-density part. I think you'll find it anyplace that's a mix of commercial/residential, no matter which quadrant.
No actually, you really don't. Huge swaths of Ward 3 and parts of Ward 2 that are a quick 2-3 block walk to commerce on Connecticut / Wisconsin / Mass do not have litter.
The strictly commercial sections _previously_ had no litter, either, but there has been a small uptick where there are buildings now comprised of formerly unhoused voucher recipients on bits of Conn. and Wisc. But still very little.
I think those commercial areas just have a lot of privately funded clean up. The stores pay for it because it’s important to their business. There may well also be less litter there than other areas, but I think any public commercial zone that seems really clean is getting cleaned a lot. Litter picked up, sidewalks washed, etc.