Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He has really become a disgrace for my alma mater. I am so glad my kid is done with UMD in December
Why exactly? MIT gave him the PhD and allowed him to plagiarize freely, not UMD.
Anonymous wrote:Is the data and results his own?
Were the results correct and methodology sound?
Anonymous wrote:Is the data and results his own?
Were the results correct and methodology sound?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Your source is problematic, OP.
I'll wait until it hits the mainstream news.
He confessed.
"While I am steadfast that our results, data and findings are sound, I acknowledge recurrent language in the introductory sections.”
He copied a few pages of background material.
Does that change the core of the paper? No.
Was it a cowardly and dishonest way to fill space and set the context of the paper? Yes.
Is it claiming credit for someone else's expository work? Yes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He has really become a disgrace for my alma mater. I am so glad my kid is done with UMD in December
Why exactly? MIT gave him the PhD and allowed him to plagiarize freely, not UMD.
.Anonymous wrote:He has really become a disgrace for my alma mater. I am so glad my kid is done with UMD in December
Anonymous wrote:He has really become a disgrace for my alma mater. I am so glad my kid is done with UMD in December
Anonymous wrote:https://dbknews.com/2024/09/18/pines-denies-plagiarism-accusations/
The degree of intentional copying is, unlike some recent high profile cases, NOT minor and cannot be chalked up to an unintentional mistake due to carelesses. He (and his coauthor) copied nearly a 1/3 of his 5000 word academic paper from an Australian student's website in 2002 with no credit to the real author. He only changed the spelling from Australian convention to American spelling. If you look at side by side comparisons, there can be no doubt about plagiarism. Clearly unethical, clearly cheating. Any undergrad student, or even high school student, should know better. He should acknowledge he made a serious error of judgment and step down immediately, and the university needs to stop defending him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Your source is problematic, OP.
I'll wait until it hits the mainstream news.
He confessed.
"While I am steadfast that our results, data and findings are sound, I acknowledge recurrent language in the introductory sections.”
He copied a few pages of background material.
Does that change the core of the paper? No.
Was it a cowardly and dishonest way to fill space and set the context of the paper? Yes.
Is it claiming credit for someone else's expository work? Yes.
If he were the president of some successful tech firm, I guess a slap on the wrist might do. Companies care about product and profit, not academic integrity. But a university president? What is UMD going to do if students plagiarize their 1/3 of their papers from internet sources? How can you justify punishing students if you let this go? So shady.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Your source is problematic, OP.
I'll wait until it hits the mainstream news.
He confessed.
"While I am steadfast that our results, data and findings are sound, I acknowledge recurrent language in the introductory sections.”
He copied a few pages of background material.
Does that change the core of the paper? No.
Was it a cowardly and dishonest way to fill space and set the context of the paper? Yes.
Is it claiming credit for someone else's expository work? Yes.