Anonymous wrote:Anyone have a recommendation for a periodontist to do gum graft in NoVA?
Anonymous wrote:Gum grafting with Allograft is not painful. By that, I mean the healing process is not painful. Getting the novacaine shots prior to surgery is painful. That would be true for any type of grafting. I had 10 teeth grafted. I took advil fir the first 12 hrs because they td me to. Woke up the next morning and was surprised I didn't need any meds.
It IS a commitment for 6-ish week to brush differently (or not at all on the site), to chew differently, to avoid certain foods, to break food into tiny morsels. It's not like you just leave from surgery a d go back to regular life like you would with a cavity being filled. But, it wasn't painful.
Anonymous wrote:I did pinhole 4 years ago and love it. Dentist tried to get me to do a traditional graft (cut from roof of mouth and sewn onto gums). It would have been two 4-hour operations spread a few weeks apart to allow eating on the other side of the mouth during recovery periods. That sounded gruesome and terrible so I looked up the alternatives: Pinhole was close to the same price and the whole mouth was done in an hour under a choice of local or twilight anesthesia (I chose twilight.). It was easy and wonderful. Mouth was mildly sore for a few days but not bad at all. No cuts on the palate (roof) of the mouth, no stitches, no scarring or mismatched tissue--and still holding up great now. If a graft fails, it can actually fall out. If pinhole fails, it just retracts back to where it was before--and the failure rate is pretty low. I did the pinhole thinking "well if it fails, I can fall back on the old-school graft later" but it didn't fail, and I saved myself that experience.
I just had my regular cleaning and the dentist commented (with a surprised tone of voice) how well the pinhole gum surgery was holding up. I honestly can't believe people still do this the old-fashioned way anymore. It's like the difference between old-school "cut you wide open" surgery and laparoscopic surgery. Go for it.
Anonymous wrote:I did pinhole 4 years ago and love it. Dentist tried to get me to do a traditional graft (cut from roof of mouth and sewn onto gums). It would have been two 4-hour operations spread a few weeks apart to allow eating on the other side of the mouth during recovery periods. That sounded gruesome and terrible so I looked up the alternatives: Pinhole was close to the same price and the whole mouth was done in an hour under a choice of local or twilight anesthesia (I chose twilight.). It was easy and wonderful. Mouth was mildly sore for a few days but not bad at all. No cuts on the palate (roof) of the mouth, no stitches, no scarring or mismatched tissue--and still holding up great now. If a graft fails, it can actually fall out. If pinhole fails, it just retracts back to where it was before--and the failure rate is pretty low. I did the pinhole thinking "well if it fails, I can fall back on the old-school graft later" but it didn't fail, and I saved myself that experience.
I just had my regular cleaning and the dentist commented (with a surprised tone of voice) how well the pinhole gum surgery was holding up. I honestly can't believe people still do this the old-fashioned way anymore. It's like the difference between old-school "cut you wide open" surgery and laparoscopic surgery. Go for it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, I am considering options for this myself now. My doctor didn't present pinhole as an option, but my research suggests that it might have a lower success rate and might not be covered by insurance. Getting a second opinion soon but it does seem like using donor gums vs your own might be much less painful and have less recovery time.
Are there risks in using donor tissue with regards to viruses, etc?
No. None at all. All the biological cells are washed out. Basically it's the collagen scaffold that remains and your own skin cells grow onto it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, I am considering options for this myself now. My doctor didn't present pinhole as an option, but my research suggests that it might have a lower success rate and might not be covered by insurance. Getting a second opinion soon but it does seem like using donor gums vs your own might be much less painful and have less recovery time.
Are there risks in using donor tissue with regards to viruses, etc?
I don’t think it’s an infection risk due to the way the tissue is prepared.
However, I consulted with two oral surgeons who do grafts and implants exclusively. Both avoid Allograft/donor tissue when possible. They explained to me that the risk of complications and the durability of the result are both better when they use the patient’s own tissue (autologous graft). That said, sometimes it is necessary to use donor tissue when they cannot successfully harvest the amount needed from the roof of the patient’s mouth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, I am considering options for this myself now. My doctor didn't present pinhole as an option, but my research suggests that it might have a lower success rate and might not be covered by insurance. Getting a second opinion soon but it does seem like using donor gums vs your own might be much less painful and have less recovery time.
Are there risks in using donor tissue with regards to viruses, etc?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, I am considering options for this myself now. My doctor didn't present pinhole as an option, but my research suggests that it might have a lower success rate and might not be covered by insurance. Getting a second opinion soon but it does seem like using donor gums vs your own might be much less painful and have less recovery time.
Are there risks in using donor tissue with regards to viruses, etc?
I don’t think it’s an infection risk due to the way the tissue is prepared.
However, I consulted with two oral surgeons who do grafts and implants exclusively. Both avoid Allograft/donor tissue when possible. They explained to me that the risk of complications and the durability of the result are both better when they use the patient’s own tissue (autologous graft). That said, sometimes it is necessary to use donor tissue when they cannot successfully harvest the amount needed from the roof of the patient’s mouth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, I am considering options for this myself now. My doctor didn't present pinhole as an option, but my research suggests that it might have a lower success rate and might not be covered by insurance. Getting a second opinion soon but it does seem like using donor gums vs your own might be much less painful and have less recovery time.
Are there risks in using donor tissue with regards to viruses, etc?
Anonymous wrote:OP, I am considering options for this myself now. My doctor didn't present pinhole as an option, but my research suggests that it might have a lower success rate and might not be covered by insurance. Getting a second opinion soon but it does seem like using donor gums vs your own might be much less painful and have less recovery time.