Anonymous wrote:OP, I can relate to your post. We chose to send DD to K a little early, because she was truly ready academically for K, and we figured she would catch up socially. By fourth grade, we found the exact opposite to be true!
We didn’t do it, and though she’s in 8th now and everything has leveled out for the most part, I wish I would have sent her to a different school to repeat 5th, because now that she’s in 8th, I can tell she’s socially behind again. And there would be nothing wrong at all with her having the extra academics.
Anonymous wrote:5th is the oldest grade I’d repeat. 8th grade has real subjects/periods… would be pretty boring to repeat that, unless he’s really struggling academically. Any public school should let you put him in his age-appropriate grade at any point, I would think.
Anonymous wrote:Publics will not retain your child unless they have made some kind of error that does not allow your child to benefit from his education.
Anonymous wrote:Would a different *private* allow DS to repeat 5th or 8th?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm confused by your post.
Did you send him early, meaning according to cut off dates he should be a grade below? if so that was really dumb. Why would you do that to your kid? You need to get him back with his age group.
No, some areas have a huge number of redshirts. My son is April and 3rd youngest boy of a class of 90. Many kids are 13m older. If he was Aug on time many kids would be 16m older.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks so much for your thoughts!
Agree and that’s why I’d like to wait until 5th or 8th to repeat the grade (if necessary then) as opposed to repeating K next year at a be school. Just not sure if we’d be able to repeat 5th or 8th.
Seems to be average academically and below average in sports but he’s not even 5 yet so want to wait and see.
Don't make decisions like this based on sports.
Academics should account for at least 90% of you decision, and social issues at most 10%. It might be too early to tell if academic problems will persist over the years. And social issues depend much more on personality than age, and putting your kid with younger classmates won't automatically make him a leader or alpha dog. Even youngest boys can end up alpha if they are naturally pushy and over confident.
Disagree. Social is #1. Kids catch up academically and sports are not worth changing over. It's an inflated sense of being "good" if you are a year younger in ES but it can't carry you all the way.
Completely false. Kids do not catch up academically just by being promoted to the next grade year after year. That's why summer school is so prevalent. And public schools never consider anything other than academics when parents request retention. If you say you want to retain Larlo because he is the smallest, youngest, and most immature boy in class, but his test scores show him at grade level, they are just going to roll their eyes and say "NO."