Anonymous wrote:Tufts at 52, Carnegie Mellon at 58
Anonymous wrote:How did my Case Western rank only 238?
Anonymous wrote:Sounds like the parents who finally have their kids’ school receive a better ranking think this list is perfect.
Anonymous wrote:I took a look and really makes zero sense. It is getting to the point where rankings are worthless. I focus on acceptance rate and rate of employment or grad school after. Also rate of graduation in four years. You have to look at metrics important to your family. Pell grants not helpful to us so not something we would focus on or grad research if you are not at a school with grad school also wouldn’t be a fit for us but might be for others.
Anonymous wrote:Completely pointless to rank colleges.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This seems like a list without payoffs and manipulation.
Ummm, Carnegie Mellon is below Cal Poly SLO. In what world is that accurate? (Its' not---CalPolySLO is a good school, but definately not on par with CMU)
Anonymous wrote:Completely pointless to jumble all different kinds of colleges together and try to make it linear.
Anonymous wrote:I took a look and really makes zero sense. It is getting to the point where rankings are worthless. I focus on acceptance rate and rate of employment or grad school after. Also rate of graduation in four years. You have to look at metrics important to your family. Pell grants not helpful to us so not something we would focus on or grad research if you are not at a school with grad school also wouldn’t be a fit for us but might be for others.