Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, isn’t this ironic. You just revealed your true colors—‘best students’!Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The solution is easy: Do away with TJ and save all those bus trips for middle schools. It is absolutely ridiculous that FCPS provides buses in McLean for 5-10 kids to travel to and from Annandale every day. Bad for the environment, bad for everyone.
Yeah, how dare we try to nurture our best students.
What they meant to say was "most heavily prepped students"
Anonymous wrote:Well, isn’t this ironic. You just revealed your true colors—‘best students’!Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The solution is easy: Do away with TJ and save all those bus trips for middle schools. It is absolutely ridiculous that FCPS provides buses in McLean for 5-10 kids to travel to and from Annandale every day. Bad for the environment, bad for everyone.
Yeah, how dare we try to nurture our best students.
Anonymous wrote:Get rid of the AAP centers. DD had the choice of staying at her base or AAP center; I kept her at the base where she thrived. Only kids who are at failing schools need to receive enrichment outside of the classroom. There is no need to move kids from one elementary school in McLean to another. It’s completely absurd. If people think they need it that much make them responsible for their own transportation. Why should everyone else suffer?
Well, isn’t this ironic. You just revealed your true colors—‘best students’!Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The solution is easy: Do away with TJ and save all those bus trips for middle schools. It is absolutely ridiculous that FCPS provides buses in McLean for 5-10 kids to travel to and from Annandale every day. Bad for the environment, bad for everyone.
Yeah, how dare we try to nurture our best students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Get rid of the AAP centers. DD had the choice of staying at her base or AAP center; I kept her at the base where she thrived. Only kids who are at failing schools need to receive enrichment outside of the classroom. There is no need to move kids from one elementary school in McLean to another. It’s completely absurd. If people think they need it that much make them responsible for their own transportation. Why should everyone else suffer?
This. One of the things that annoys me as a teacher. Even more so since every kid is doing the same LA curriculum regardless of AAP. So basically they are going to a different school for SS/Science.
AAP doesn't have anything to do with "failing schools" since there aren't any.
Also, getting rid of AAP would ultimately have more of a negative effect on the budget than the few thousand saved by a two or three fewer bus runs.
PP did not propose getting rid of AAP altogether, she proposed getting rid of the Center schools. I agree. I think they should treat AAP Centers the same way they treat other choice schools. If kids don't get bussed to language immersion or the other choice schools (Bailey's, Hunter Woods, etc.), then they should not get bussed to AAP Centers if their base school offers an LLIV option.
Totally agree. I am an AAP teacher at a LL4. It drives me insane even more so since everyone is getting the same LA curriculum. So basically they are going to a center for SS/Science. Such a waste of resources.
Anonymous wrote:The solution is easy: Do away with TJ and save all those bus trips for middle schools. It is absolutely ridiculous that FCPS provides buses in McLean for 5-10 kids to travel to and from Annandale every day. Bad for the environment, bad for everyone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Get rid of the AAP centers. DD had the choice of staying at her base or AAP center; I kept her at the base where she thrived. Only kids who are at failing schools need to receive enrichment outside of the classroom. There is no need to move kids from one elementary school in McLean to another. It’s completely absurd. If people think they need it that much make them responsible for their own transportation. Why should everyone else suffer?
This. One of the things that annoys me as a teacher. Even more so since every kid is doing the same LA curriculum regardless of AAP. So basically they are going to a different school for SS/Science.
AAP doesn't have anything to do with "failing schools" since there aren't any.
Also, getting rid of AAP would ultimately have more of a negative effect on the budget than the few thousand saved by a two or three fewer bus runs.
PP did not propose getting rid of AAP altogether, she proposed getting rid of the Center schools. I agree. I think they should treat AAP Centers the same way they treat other choice schools. If kids don't get bussed to language immersion or the other choice schools (Bailey's, Hunter Woods, etc.), then they should not get bussed to AAP Centers if their base school offers an LLIV option.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Get rid of the AAP centers. DD had the choice of staying at her base or AAP center; I kept her at the base where she thrived. Only kids who are at failing schools need to receive enrichment outside of the classroom. There is no need to move kids from one elementary school in McLean to another. It’s completely absurd. If people think they need it that much make them responsible for their own transportation. Why should everyone else suffer?
This. One of the things that annoys me as a teacher. Even more so since every kid is doing the same LA curriculum regardless of AAP. So basically they are going to a different school for SS/Science.
AAP doesn't have anything to do with "failing schools" since there aren't any.
Also, getting rid of AAP would ultimately have more of a negative effect on the budget than the few thousand saved by a two or three fewer bus runs.
PP did not propose getting rid of AAP altogether, she proposed getting rid of the Center schools. I agree. I think they should treat AAP Centers the same way they treat other choice schools. If kids don't get bussed to language immersion or the other choice schools (Bailey's, Hunter Woods, etc.), then they should not get bussed to AAP Centers if their base school offers an LLIV option.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Get rid of the AAP centers. DD had the choice of staying at her base or AAP center; I kept her at the base where she thrived. Only kids who are at failing schools need to receive enrichment outside of the classroom. There is no need to move kids from one elementary school in McLean to another. It’s completely absurd. If people think they need it that much make them responsible for their own transportation. Why should everyone else suffer?
AAP doesn't have anything to do with "failing schools" since there aren't any.
Also, getting rid of AAP would ultimately have more of a negative effect on the budget than the few thousand saved by a two or three fewer bus runs.
Anonymous wrote:Get rid of the AAP centers. DD had the choice of staying at her base or AAP center; I kept her at the base where she thrived. Only kids who are at failing schools need to receive enrichment outside of the classroom. There is no need to move kids from one elementary school in McLean to another. It’s completely absurd. If people think they need it that much make them responsible for their own transportation. Why should everyone else suffer?
Anonymous wrote:The solution is easy: Do away with TJ and save all those bus trips for middle schools. It is absolutely ridiculous that FCPS provides buses in McLean for 5-10 kids to travel to and from Annandale every day. Bad for the environment, bad for everyone.