Oh great.. Trump's got the three stooges.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Laugh all you want but Gabbard backing Trump is huge IMHO and while I don't agree with all of her political views I can appreciate why she left the DNC.

Hopefully this post doesn't get deleted. I posted this news last night with little to no commentary and it got deleted all 3 times.

Yeah, you saying it over and over doesn't make it so. Sorry.

She was outed as a Russian operative and election spoiler a long time ago. This is as predictable as death and taxes, and it's only "huge" to people paid to say so.

Clown car indeed.

She was “outed” by Clinton - who had zero evidence or proof.

The only one who already that false talking point are idiots or those paid by the DNC to spread lies?

Which one are you? A little of both I reckon…

Nope. The government of Ukraine has placed her on a list of people who are spreading disinformation for Russia. She's bad news, through and through.
https://theweek.com/ukraine/1015428/ukraine-accuses-tulsi-gabbard-and-rand-paul-of-promoting-russian-propaganda

She is on record as claiming the US and Russia are "not so different" on freedom of speech, which is utterly bizarre as a belief.
https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2022/tulsi-gabbard-falsely-claimed-the-us-is-not-so-different-from-russia-on-freedom-of-speech/

Her anti-US claims are being rebroadcast as Russian news propaganda.
https://theintercept.com/2022/02/24/russian-tv-uses-tucker-carlson-tulsi-gabbard-sell-putins-war/

Alexander Vindman called her out as an instrument of the Russian government.
https://www.newsweek.com/vindman-calls-gabbard-agent-russian-disinformation-after-fox-segment-1733443

She held a private meeting with Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad, during his repeated war crimes against civilians, without any official designation.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/26/tulsi-gabbard-bashar-al-assad-syria-democrats

We can do this all day, PP. If you want to keep posting in support of Gabbard, you just invite detailed criticism in return -- and with receipts.

Anonymous wrote:This would be like Democrats being happy that Hannibal lecter was endorsing them.

I don’t know why he was at the DNC when they cheated him out of a nomination twice and he knows it

Bernie Sanders should’ve endorsed Trump too

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Laugh all you want but Gabbard backing Trump is huge IMHO and while I don't agree with all of her political views I can appreciate why she left the DNC.

Hopefully this post doesn't get deleted. I posted this news last night with little to no commentary and it got deleted all 3 times.

Yeah, you saying it over and over doesn't make it so. Sorry.

She was outed as a Russian operative and election spoiler a long time ago. This is as predictable as death and taxes, and it's only "huge" to people paid to say so.

Clown car indeed.

She was “outed” by Clinton - who had zero evidence or proof.

The only one who already that false talking point are idiots or those paid by the DNC to spread lies?

Which one are you? A little of both I reckon…

I'm also not having to listen to the aspiring college professors who couldn't get a job, the wanna-be doctors who couldn't get a spot in medical schools, or the small business aspirants who never opened up shop.

Trump's NSA, Chief of Staff, Vice President and many other cabinet members have refused to endorse Trump, but Trump got two whackaloon former Democrats to endorse him and that's supposed to mean something.

Yeah whatever.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like her and Trump might be better for not starting new war but VP Harris will be better for
peaceful transfer of power.
Conundrum.

Yeah, real conundrum all right, Boris.

Sorry to offend you, but Democrats are neocons now.

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile 200 actual Republican officials have signed a letter against Trump, saying they are voting Harris.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/08/26/bush-mccain-romney-trump-harris-2024/74947380007/

They don't count. Only washed up politicians trying to hang in to their 15 minutes of fame count.

Anonymous wrote:I like her and Trump might be better for not starting new war but VP Harris will be better for
peaceful transfer of power.
Conundrum.

Yeah, real conundrum all right, Boris.

I like her and Trump might be better for not starting new war but VP Harris will be better for
peaceful transfer of power.
Conundrum.

Meanwhile 200 actual Republican officials have signed a letter against Trump, saying they are voting Harris.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/08/26/bush-mccain-romney-trump-harris-2024/74947380007/

Anonymous wrote:The reaction of the majority:

[youtube] https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JsmAcFY5AHQ[/youtube]

and then cue the circus music: