Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We do a lot of split vacations, 3-4 days each in two different places.
I'm more like your DH, I'd love the ranch resort and have no interest in a luxury hotel in town. I'd pick up non-perishable food for breakfast, lunch and snacks at a store in town on my way there, and just eat dinner at the ranch restaurant. But if the luxury hotel is what you want, it's your vacation too. Splitting the time sounds like a perfect compromise.
+1 the bulk of our vacations are split across 2 places. Usually a city + national park or other nature/hiking place. The former is often the city with the airport we flew into. Nice to experience different things over a 7-10 day trip.
Anonymous wrote:We do a lot of split vacations, 3-4 days each in two different places.
I'm more like your DH, I'd love the ranch resort and have no interest in a luxury hotel in town. I'd pick up non-perishable food for breakfast, lunch and snacks at a store in town on my way there, and just eat dinner at the ranch restaurant. But if the luxury hotel is what you want, it's your vacation too. Splitting the time sounds like a perfect compromise.
Anonymous wrote:My tip for this is to stay at the nicer hotel on the second leg so it doesn't feel like a downgrade. I also try to align this with the more relaxing portion of the trip.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I personally prefer split stays.
+1 we always do this