Anonymous wrote:So many of you seem to be unable to read for comprehension:
“ Other permits describe more cosmetic changes to the home, such as the replacement of the front door and front-facing windows, the addition of roofs over uncovered portions of the home, and renovations to the basement. These projects are managed by the same private construction firms working with DGS on the security upgrades, but they are not listed among the elements of the project coordinated by the city agency, so it’s unclear whether they’re also publicly funded.”
Let me copy/paste the key sentence ——>
“it’s unclear whether they’re also publicly funded.”
This is just a hit job without any basis in reality.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The improvements were categorized as “renovation to MPD 4th District North Office” which is the MPD guard shack at the end of her driveway.
https://washingtoncitypaper.com/article/746504/bowsers-colonial-village-home-is-getting-525000-in-taxpayer-funded-improvements/
With all these improvements, it sounds like Bowser is running for reelection.
Local journalism is important!
"Much of the work includes security upgrades to the two-story house. Documents filed with the Department of Buildings describe the replacement of a “security booth” on the property for the mayor’s Metropolitan Police Department detail, as well as the installation of a new fence behind the home and three “exterior light poles w/ integrated security cameras.” (Amusingly, some of the permits describe the project as the “renovation to MPD 4th District North Office, which may be technically accurate, but leaves out some important context.) The plans submitted to DOB also call for the widening of the home’s driveway, the replacement of a retaining wall that runs alongside it, and the installation of a new guardrail at the house’s “rear yard terrace.”"
If I were the mayor of DC, I would want these additional security upgrades. There are a lot of bonkers people out there who target elected officials, judges, etc.
You’re an idiot. She’s getting fixes to her driveway, retaining walls, and even roofs installed over outdoor areas to make them enclosed. She’s trying to wrap in major home improvements into ‘security upgrades’ to make it appear legit. It’s money laundering except taxpayer dollars for personal home improvements she should be paying 100% out of pocket for.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Corruption is her forte.
Watching people defend her on Twitter is certainly weird.
Unless someone has a personal stake in Bowser's administration at this point, I cannot understand support for her
Anonymous wrote:So many of you seem to be unable to read for comprehension:
“ Other permits describe more cosmetic changes to the home, such as the replacement of the front door and front-facing windows, the addition of roofs over uncovered portions of the home, and renovations to the basement. These projects are managed by the same private construction firms working with DGS on the security upgrades, but they are not listed among the elements of the project coordinated by the city agency, so it’s unclear whether they’re also publicly funded.”
Let me copy/paste the key sentence ——>
“it’s unclear whether they’re also publicly funded.”
This is just a hit job without any basis in reality.
\Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there really a security threat necessitating a guard booth?? If so, then I guess it's fair for that to be publicly funded, but I have never heard of a DC Mayor being the subject of a threat like that.
She should 100% be paying for her own fence and retaining wall. GMAB.
DC should really just have an official mayor's residence with built-in security, continuity of government features, and space to host official events.
Otherwise, we need to rebuild the wheel every time we have a new mayor.
Except that she is the mayor of a city. Not a state governor. Very different.
Anonymous wrote:I have no problem with this. I wouldn't want to be the mayor of a large city like DC without adequate security.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there really a security threat necessitating a guard booth?? If so, then I guess it's fair for that to be publicly funded, but I have never heard of a DC Mayor being the subject of a threat like that.
She should 100% be paying for her own fence and retaining wall. GMAB.
DC should really just have an official mayor's residence with built-in security, continuity of government features, and space to host official events.
Otherwise, we need to rebuild the wheel every time we have a new mayor.
Anonymous wrote:With all this sunk cost in the mayor's home, should DC even bother with electing someone else? DC could save a lot of money by just making Bowser mayor for life.
Anonymous wrote:Corruption is her forte.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The improvements were categorized as “renovation to MPD 4th District North Office” which is the MPD guard shack at the end of her driveway.
https://washingtoncitypaper.com/article/746504/bowsers-colonial-village-home-is-getting-525000-in-taxpayer-funded-improvements/
With all these improvements, it sounds like Bowser is running for reelection.
Local journalism is important!
"Much of the work includes security upgrades to the two-story house. Documents filed with the Department of Buildings describe the replacement of a “security booth” on the property for the mayor’s Metropolitan Police Department detail, as well as the installation of a new fence behind the home and three “exterior light poles w/ integrated security cameras.” (Amusingly, some of the permits describe the project as the “renovation to MPD 4th District North Office, which may be technically accurate, but leaves out some important context.) The plans submitted to DOB also call for the widening of the home’s driveway, the replacement of a retaining wall that runs alongside it, and the installation of a new guardrail at the house’s “rear yard terrace.”"
If I were the mayor of DC, I would want these additional security upgrades. There are a lot of bonkers people out there who target elected officials, judges, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there really a security threat necessitating a guard booth?? If so, then I guess it's fair for that to be publicly funded, but I have never heard of a DC Mayor being the subject of a threat like that.
She should 100% be paying for her own fence and retaining wall. GMAB.
DC should really just have an official mayor's residence with built-in security, continuity of government features, and space to host official events.
Otherwise, we need to rebuild the wheel every time we have a new mayor.
Some rich person offered to donate one a decade or so ago. It was turned down for some reason.