Anonymous wrote:Hmm, most of the “youths” I see taking Metro avail themselves of the student discount - ie, jumping over the turnstiles.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OMG, people. The article that just appeared in The Post disclosed how horribly underfunded Metro is. I think OP was trying to point out that our first priority should be to metro, and we’ll be lucky to fund that, let alone deal with Purple Line costs, particularly when MoCo’s wealthier households are being replaced by much lower income families. It is not a pretty picture.
The two budgets are separate. Shows what you know! So don't "OMG people" us when you know absolutely nothing about how these projects work and how they're funded.
And as a resident of MoCo's wealthier area, no, we're not going anywhere. So many people are ready to throw down 2-5M for a house in my neighborhood, there is no inventory, and there hasn't been for YEARS.
If you're the anti-Elrich, anti-liberal MoCo poster... sorry to tell you, we're doing pretty well here.
IRS tax data shows that rich people are leaving MOCO.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OMG, people. The article that just appeared in The Post disclosed how horribly underfunded Metro is. I think OP was trying to point out that our first priority should be to metro, and we’ll be lucky to fund that, let alone deal with Purple Line costs, particularly when MoCo’s wealthier households are being replaced by much lower income families. It is not a pretty picture.
The two budgets are separate. Shows what you know! So don't "OMG people" us when you know absolutely nothing about how these projects work and how they're funded.
And as a resident of MoCo's wealthier area, no, we're not going anywhere. So many people are ready to throw down 2-5M for a house in my neighborhood, there is no inventory, and there hasn't been for YEARS.
If you're the anti-Elrich, anti-liberal MoCo poster... sorry to tell you, we're doing pretty well here.
Anonymous wrote:OMG, people. The article that just appeared in The Post disclosed how horribly underfunded Metro is. I think OP was trying to point out that our first priority should be to metro, and we’ll be lucky to fund that, let alone deal with Purple Line costs, particularly when MoCo’s wealthier households are being replaced by much lower income families. It is not a pretty picture.
Anonymous wrote:Give up already! You bought a house that backs up to the abandoned trolly line and you thought that it was your personal private land despite the reality of the situation. You need to accept that it is happening and stop fighting.
If you actually cared about public money then you would realize that a huge part of the purple line cost has been the litigation and delays resulting from the litigation with NIMBY folks. Stop!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you kidding? Bethesda to UMD? We want it. Thousands of college students, university profs and employees are eagerly waiting for it.
Don't be stupid.
More like maids and construction workers
Don’t be naive