Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't this weed out the kids who were prepped in? My kid is definitely in classes with kids who don't belong in AAP but because they don't get counseled out or reevaluated annually, they're just stuck there and it's (a) hard for those kids and (b) annoying for the truly advanced kids who they are holding behind.
You wouldn't be weeding out prepped kids, you would be weeding out the kids that are referred by parents.
On the whole, test scores reflect ability whether it is prepped or not. An unprepared kid can underperform but a well prepared kid will not outperform.
Don't excuse your child's failure with the fact that other kids have studied.
You have no idea what you're talking about. You are absolutely NOT supposed to prepare for tests like NNAT and COGAT. You can ABSOLUTELY trick those tests into believing your child is gifted because you have taught your child the strategies to answer the questions as opposed to actually gifted children who can intuitively answer the questions without any help at all. You don't see the difference there?
The thing is, almost everyone preps for these so if you don't, you are at a disadvantage. Have you been to lotte in Fairfax? They sell cogat prep books. If you think people aren't prepping their kids then you are deluded. Also, AAP is no a gifted program. It's an advanced academic program. There is a difference.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't this weed out the kids who were prepped in? My kid is definitely in classes with kids who don't belong in AAP but because they don't get counseled out or reevaluated annually, they're just stuck there and it's (a) hard for those kids and (b) annoying for the truly advanced kids who they are holding behind.
You wouldn't be weeding out prepped kids, you would be weeding out the kids that are referred by parents.
On the whole, test scores reflect ability whether it is prepped or not. An unprepared kid can underperform but a well prepared kid will not outperform.
Don't excuse your child's failure with the fact that other kids have studied.
You have no idea what you're talking about. You are absolutely NOT supposed to prepare for tests like NNAT and COGAT. You can ABSOLUTELY trick those tests into believing your child is gifted because you have taught your child the strategies to answer the questions as opposed to actually gifted children who can intuitively answer the questions without any help at all. You don't see the difference there?
The thing is, almost everyone preps for these so if you don't, you are at a disadvantage. Have you been to lotte in Fairfax? They sell cogat prep books. If you think people aren't prepping their kids then you are deluded. Also, AAP is no a gifted program. It's an advanced academic program. There is a difference.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wondered about this when my kid was going through the program. Annual reevaluation for all kids would be a waste of time and overkill, but kids who are consistently failing the SOLs and unable to keep up with the work should be kicked out. On the flip side, passing advanced on both SOLs and getting 4s across the board should be a guaranteed in. There are very few kids who pass advanced on both reading and math who couldn't handle the pace and curriculum of AAP.
On the one hand it's bad for kid's self esteem if they are removed. On the other hand, nobody cares about the self esteem of kids who don't get in
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't this weed out the kids who were prepped in? My kid is definitely in classes with kids who don't belong in AAP but because they don't get counseled out or reevaluated annually, they're just stuck there and it's (a) hard for those kids and (b) annoying for the truly advanced kids who they are holding behind.
You wouldn't be weeding out prepped kids, you would be weeding out the kids that are referred by parents.
On the whole, test scores reflect ability whether it is prepped or not. An unprepared kid can underperform but a well prepared kid will not outperform.
Don't excuse your child's failure with the fact that other kids have studied.
You have no idea what you're talking about. You are absolutely NOT supposed to prepare for tests like NNAT and COGAT. You can ABSOLUTELY trick those tests into believing your child is gifted because you have taught your child the strategies to answer the questions as opposed to actually gifted children who can intuitively answer the questions without any help at all. You don't see the difference there?
The thing is, almost everyone preps for these so if you don't, you are at a disadvantage. Have you been to lotte in Fairfax? They sell cogat prep books. If you think people aren't prepping their kids then you are deluded. Also, AAP is no a gifted program. It's an advanced academic program. There is a difference.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't this weed out the kids who were prepped in? My kid is definitely in classes with kids who don't belong in AAP but because they don't get counseled out or reevaluated annually, they're just stuck there and it's (a) hard for those kids and (b) annoying for the truly advanced kids who they are holding behind.
You wouldn't be weeding out prepped kids, you would be weeding out the kids that are referred by parents.
On the whole, test scores reflect ability whether it is prepped or not. An unprepared kid can underperform but a well prepared kid will not outperform.
Don't excuse your child's failure with the fact that other kids have studied.
You have no idea what you're talking about. You are absolutely NOT supposed to prepare for tests like NNAT and COGAT. You can ABSOLUTELY trick those tests into believing your child is gifted because you have taught your child the strategies to answer the questions as opposed to actually gifted children who can intuitively answer the questions without any help at all. You don't see the difference there?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wondered about this when my kid was going through the program. Annual reevaluation for all kids would be a waste of time and overkill, but kids who are consistently failing the SOLs and unable to keep up with the work should be kicked out. On the flip side, passing advanced on both SOLs and getting 4s across the board should be a guaranteed in. There are very few kids who pass advanced on both reading and math who couldn't handle the pace and curriculum of AAP.
On the one hand it's bad for kid's self esteem if they are removed. On the other hand, nobody cares about the self esteem of kids who don't get in
This is a stupid argument. Maybe parents and schools should stop telling AAP kids that they're special. Maybe instead tell children that they are in classes that meet their needs and stop there. One of my kids asked why they didn't get in to AAP and I said "You don't need to be in there. You're going to get advanced math pull outs, but everything else in the normal classroom is perfect for you!" and that was that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't this weed out the kids who were prepped in? My kid is definitely in classes with kids who don't belong in AAP but because they don't get counseled out or reevaluated annually, they're just stuck there and it's (a) hard for those kids and (b) annoying for the truly advanced kids who they are holding behind.
You wouldn't be weeding out prepped kids, you would be weeding out the kids that are referred by parents.
On the whole, test scores reflect ability whether it is prepped or not. An unprepared kid can underperform but a well prepared kid will not outperform.
Don't excuse your child's failure with the fact that other kids have studied.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it would be easier to do that if they moved away from the center model.
Can't imagine being the poor kid who switched schools, because he thought he was smarter than everyone else, and then got sent back to his base school because he wasn't so special after all.
This is partly the reason. I asked about moving my DC back to gen ed because they were struggling a little (this was during virtual school), and the school told me they generally don’t do that because other kids will know and DC might feel bad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't this weed out the kids who were prepped in? My kid is definitely in classes with kids who don't belong in AAP but because they don't get counseled out or reevaluated annually, they're just stuck there and it's (a) hard for those kids and (b) annoying for the truly advanced kids who they are holding behind.
Get off your high horse and get ready for your kid to fail.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wondered about this when my kid was going through the program. Annual reevaluation for all kids would be a waste of time and overkill, but kids who are consistently failing the SOLs and unable to keep up with the work should be kicked out. On the flip side, passing advanced on both SOLs and getting 4s across the board should be a guaranteed in. There are very few kids who pass advanced on both reading and math who couldn't handle the pace and curriculum of AAP.
On the one hand it's bad for kid's self esteem if they are removed. On the other hand, nobody cares about the self esteem of kids who don't get in
Anonymous wrote:How do you know they don't belong? Do the teachers discuss others' grades with you?
Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't this weed out the kids who were prepped in? My kid is definitely in classes with kids who don't belong in AAP but because they don't get counseled out or reevaluated annually, they're just stuck there and it's (a) hard for those kids and (b) annoying for the truly advanced kids who they are holding behind.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How do you know they don't belong? Do the teachers discuss others' grades with you?
Ignoring the fact that there are parents on this forum who admit to applying and appealing multiple years to get their kid into AAP who is not advanced and then using tutors to keep their kids in the class, kids discuss test scores and see who is struggling in their class and who is exceling. They know who is finishing their work early and has time to do extra work or their own thing while other kids are working with the Teacher. DS had homework maybe 5 times last year, he had friends who had an hour or so of homework every day. Their homework was any work they didn't complete in class. I know his friends parents where not happy with the amount of work that was coming home and were surprised that DS had none. We see it on the neighborhood message board when parents gripe about homework and are confused that some kids don't have any.
This isn't rocket science. There are kids strong in LA who are in AAP who are not strong in math. They struggle with the pace of math, especially in 5th and 6th grade. There are kids who are strong in math and not LA in AAP and they struggle with some of the LA work. The program would be better served to have Advanced Math and Advanced LA so that the kids who are strong in one or the other can push into the AAP class for that specific subject but stay on the grade level class for the area that they are not in need of. I know that many of the high CoGAT scores/iReady score kids who are not put in AAP are kids with high Quant scores and more average LA scores. You can't do that as easily for a kid with high verbal scores and more grade level math scores because there is no Advanced LA option.
NP. At our center school, S/SS and LA and math were integrated in 5th and especially 6th grade. Dividing into Advanced Math and Advanced LA would be difficult. Did your school not do that?
Anonymous wrote:I think it would be easier to do that if they moved away from the center model.
Can't imagine being the poor kid who switched schools, because he thought he was smarter than everyone else, and then got sent back to his base school because he wasn't so special after all.