Anonymous wrote:First of all, it is STEAM now, not “stem.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would nursing not be STEM? Also a research-based psych program is a STEM program, and is no less STEM than a biology degree.
Agree on Nursing. Disagree about psychology. Psychology “experiments” are not reproducible most of the time.
What would you say about the biology-based psych programs that overlap with neuro? Are they just social scientists with a lot of knowledge of biological systems or?
Anonymous wrote:STEM should really be S'TEM. S' = Physics & Chemistry, and E/T includes Computer Science depending on its flavor. The rest of the domains that fall under S (e.g. Biology) are really people reaching to be part of the STEM umbrella.
Anonymous wrote:Student visas.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People want the STEM label because in common parlance STEM is considered superior to non-STEM.
Ridiculous. STEM was a call for more people with tech skills. That always included nurses. It includes IT, it includes, any number of unglamorous but skilled careers. If you want to be cynical it was also a call for a tech glut so that CS wages could be surprised without offshoring and H-1Bs. It’s working.
So any vocational degree is STEM?
Anonymous wrote:The gatekeeping around the STEM label is pretty funny. At one end you have engineers who not only want to exclude the nurses, but even the biologists.
At the other end, you have nursing, kinesiology and psychology majors insisting that their majors are STEM too.
But at the end of the day the extremely broad definition makes STEM a fundamentally meaningless concept. What physics or pure math have in common with nursing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People want the STEM label because in common parlance STEM is considered superior to non-STEM.
Ridiculous. STEM was a call for more people with tech skills. That always included nurses. It includes IT, it includes, any number of unglamorous but skilled careers. If you want to be cynical it was also a call for a tech glut so that CS wages could be surprised without offshoring and H-1Bs. It’s working.
So any vocational degree is STEM?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People want the STEM label because in common parlance STEM is considered superior to non-STEM.
Ridiculous. STEM was a call for more people with tech skills. That always included nurses. It includes IT, it includes, any number of unglamorous but skilled careers. If you want to be cynical it was also a call for a tech glut so that CS wages could be surprised without offshoring and H-1Bs. It’s working.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do people with majors such as kinesiology, nursing, psychology etc. want to be considered STEM? What makes STEM "status" superior?
For the same reason there was an effort years ago to add Art to make it STEAM.