Anonymous wrote:
But I'm curious what other alternatives you think I should consider. The other things I've though of are all teaching focused: personal trainer, writing instructor/teacher/tutor. Teaching at the high school level sounds more serious than those options (though less flexible) bit o think that's actually what appeals to me about it.
Anonymous wrote:My son's freshman English teacher this year was a former corporate lawyer from the Fortune 500 corporation where I work. This was Honors English in a middling district not in DMV.
She wanted the kids to relate to her and be grateful to her for choosing teaching. There were some disorganization issues (lesson plans, lost papers, etc.). From what I heard, there were some too obvious personality conflicts with students. I think it's hard for mid-career professionals to deal with lippy kids. Because you can't sink to their level and it's very nebulous how to get them to respect you.
I definitely think subbing, even on your vacations, would be eye-opening. Determine what level and type of school district you'd be willing to accept. And investigate the likelihood of finding a role there.
If you genuinely love mentoring kids on the verge of adulthood, please consider planning to become a debate coach, model UN coach, student newspaper club sponsor, etc. Student ECs really need quality guidance. And those roles are also undersubscribed and not well-executed in my area.
Anonymous wrote:I would not recommend doing this. First, the high schools prefer to hire young teachers who are more relatable to the students and can also coach something after school. Also, you might be shocked at how poorly you will be treated by admin and parents after working in a field that is generally respected.
If none of this phases you, you will have an easier time finding a position in a middle school. You could still teach civics.
Anonymous wrote:I was in a job that involved a lot of reading and writing for years until I moved into something much more people oriented and don’t regret it. I wouldn’t have been ready a few years ago for this but now it makes sense so your instinct is right.
I agree with poster that high school age like younger teachers.
Why are you thinking of teaching as an alternative rather than many other things that involve less serious, concentrated work?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think that substitute teaching would provide an accurate picture of what it's like to teach full-time. Substitute teachers are not treated the same by students and there is no time to develop rapport with them. You're basically a pinch hitter for the day.
I'm the PP who became a teacher after subbing. I disagree with you a bit. You can actually develop a decent amount of report with students, even in one day, if it's a small class size that requires the sub to interact with the students (as opposed to a high school AP class where you're just the obligatory adult in the room). You can also take jobs that span more than one day, and you can get to know kids if you sub in the same school frequently.
But more importantly, as a sub, you can talk to teachers and observe classes. I got a ton of great advice from teachers and learned so much from observing. I knew I wanted to teach at the school I'm teaching at because all the teachers gushed about how supportive the administration was, and they pointed out that turnover at that school is very low. Openings at my school are caused by teachers moving out of the area, not teachers leaving the field. Obviously as a sub you don't have to collect data, go to meetings, interact with parents, etc., so it's very different from teaching full-time, but it was still really useful experience.
As a sub, you also don't have to develop lesson plans or grade! This is very time-consuming work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think that substitute teaching would provide an accurate picture of what it's like to teach full-time. Substitute teachers are not treated the same by students and there is no time to develop rapport with them. You're basically a pinch hitter for the day.
I'm the PP who became a teacher after subbing. I disagree with you a bit. You can actually develop a decent amount of report with students, even in one day, if it's a small class size that requires the sub to interact with the students (as opposed to a high school AP class where you're just the obligatory adult in the room). You can also take jobs that span more than one day, and you can get to know kids if you sub in the same school frequently.
But more importantly, as a sub, you can talk to teachers and observe classes. I got a ton of great advice from teachers and learned so much from observing. I knew I wanted to teach at the school I'm teaching at because all the teachers gushed about how supportive the administration was, and they pointed out that turnover at that school is very low. Openings at my school are caused by teachers moving out of the area, not teachers leaving the field. Obviously as a sub you don't have to collect data, go to meetings, interact with parents, etc., so it's very different from teaching full-time, but it was still really useful experience.
As a sub, you also don't have to develop lesson plans or grade! This is very time-consuming work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think that substitute teaching would provide an accurate picture of what it's like to teach full-time. Substitute teachers are not treated the same by students and there is no time to develop rapport with them. You're basically a pinch hitter for the day.
I'm the PP who became a teacher after subbing. I disagree with you a bit. You can actually develop a decent amount of report with students, even in one day, if it's a small class size that requires the sub to interact with the students (as opposed to a high school AP class where you're just the obligatory adult in the room). You can also take jobs that span more than one day, and you can get to know kids if you sub in the same school frequently.
But more importantly, as a sub, you can talk to teachers and observe classes. I got a ton of great advice from teachers and learned so much from observing. I knew I wanted to teach at the school I'm teaching at because all the teachers gushed about how supportive the administration was, and they pointed out that turnover at that school is very low. Openings at my school are caused by teachers moving out of the area, not teachers leaving the field. Obviously as a sub you don't have to collect data, go to meetings, interact with parents, etc., so it's very different from teaching full-time, but it was still really useful experience.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think that substitute teaching would provide an accurate picture of what it's like to teach full-time. Substitute teachers are not treated the same by students and there is no time to develop rapport with them. You're basically a pinch hitter for the day.