Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can you get injured diving into a shallow pool, yes, but by guess is that the people who get paralyzed or seriously injured diving into a shallow pool are diving in as if trying to swim to the bottom, that is going head first and straight down, which is very different than "diving" in for a race start.
Parent of a club swimmer and my kid’s normal start dive would not be remotely safe in a 2.5 foot deep pool. When people are having to alter their entry into the pool to avoid injury that is less than ideal.
Anonymous wrote:Can you get injured diving into a shallow pool, yes, but by guess is that the people who get paralyzed or seriously injured diving into a shallow pool are diving in as if trying to swim to the bottom, that is going head first and straight down, which is very different than "diving" in for a race start.
Anonymous wrote:I am the PP who first commented that this is unsafe. I’m glad at least one other person agrees. The reasoning that it’s fine because this is how it’s been done for a long time is insane. We live in a different era than when these old pools were built. We update rules when we know better. If a pool has a “no diving” sign in its shallow end, it’s not a good idea for swim team kids to be diving in there over and over. It only takes one bad dive for a tragedy. Not every kid on the swim team has a good shallow dive. Even the ones that do, their back foot can slip and all of a sudden they go much deeper than planned.
I have thought for years that NVSL is crazy. I guess it’s still true.
Anonymous wrote:It's funny. The ones who complain about 2.5 ft have no skin in the game.
Anonymous wrote:Then join the NVSL board. Whining on a random Internet forum isn’t going to bring about a change.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am the PP who first commented that this is unsafe. I’m glad at least one other person agrees. The reasoning that it’s fine because this is how it’s been done for a long time is insane. We live in a different era than when these old pools were built. We update rules when we know better. If a pool has a “no diving” sign in its shallow end, it’s not a good idea for swim team kids to be diving in there over and over. It only takes one bad dive for a tragedy. Not every kid on the swim team has a good shallow dive. Even the ones that do, their back foot can slip and all of a sudden they go much deeper than planned.
I have thought for years that NVSL is crazy. I guess it’s still true.
Then have your kid scratch. There’s no one making your kid participate but you.
Anonymous wrote:I am the PP who first commented that this is unsafe. I’m glad at least one other person agrees. The reasoning that it’s fine because this is how it’s been done for a long time is insane. We live in a different era than when these old pools were built. We update rules when we know better. If a pool has a “no diving” sign in its shallow end, it’s not a good idea for swim team kids to be diving in there over and over. It only takes one bad dive for a tragedy. Not every kid on the swim team has a good shallow dive. Even the ones that do, their back foot can slip and all of a sudden they go much deeper than planned.
I have thought for years that NVSL is crazy. I guess it’s still true.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP and not NVSL, but your all star meet is having kids dive into 2.5 feet of water?! I’m sorry but that is a clear safety issue and “pool familiarization” is not the answer. You all care so much about summer swim that everyone is going along with this like it’s NBD?
So why are you even commenting?