Anonymous wrote:I have a question: how come gone with the wind isn’t considered literary fiction? Genuinely curious, not that I necessarily think it should be. Is it because of the awful racism or is it just not good enough to be literary fiction?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I see it as genre fiction-what happens to a person in their outside world and the descriptions of it, literary fiction-what happens to a person and their inside world and the descriptions of it.
Well that's limiting and also incorrect. Wildly incorrect.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a question: how come gone with the wind isn’t considered literary fiction? Genuinely curious, not that I necessarily think it should be. Is it because of the awful racism or is it just not good enough to be literary fiction?
Literary fiction doesn't rely on exaggerated character traits, intentionally pulling emotional strings, not to mention prose.
GWTW definitely falls into the Saga genre, along with books like: The Thorn Birds, Shogun, North & South, Rich Man, Poor Man.
Anonymous wrote:Literary fiction = Bleak House
Genre fiction = Harry Potter
Anonymous wrote:I have a question: how come gone with the wind isn’t considered literary fiction? Genuinely curious, not that I necessarily think it should be. Is it because of the awful racism or is it just not good enough to be literary fiction?
Anonymous wrote:I have a question: how come gone with the wind isn’t considered literary fiction? Genuinely curious, not that I necessarily think it should be. Is it because of the awful racism or is it just not good enough to be literary fiction?