Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DCUM hates business degrees.
I got a business degree and it served me well. I've used what I learned in my finance classes and accounting classes for decades. These classes helped me in my real world jobs and also in my personal investing.
I was in econ classes with the econ majors. Honestly I thought the econ classes were kind of theoretical b.s.
PP with Econ major daughter - she agrees 100%. I cannot fathom how anyone could argue that financial management classes, accounting, marketing, strategy, sales etc. are not valuable in any business or line of work. I would also argue that interpersonal skills are becoming rarer and rarer as the years pass. Business students get a lot of practice in developing relationships, also key in life and work.
We have CS / engineering majors coming out of our eyeballs who simply cannot have an effective in-person conversation, advocate for themselves, or make a simple phone call. Soft skills are highly undervalued on this board.
Anonymous wrote:DCUM hates business degrees.
I got a business degree and it served me well. I've used what I learned in my finance classes and accounting classes for decades. These classes helped me in my real world jobs and also in my personal investing.
I was in econ classes with the econ majors. Honestly I thought the econ classes were kind of theoretical b.s.
Anonymous wrote:
Even the schools you say are a notch down are beyond good-they're excellent for setting you up to a good carer. I'd say UT is better than half the "better schools" since they are number 1 in a range of business programs and have been ranked alongside Wharton.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:An undergrad business degree is the GED of college degrees. The types of courses range so widely from school to school it's not impressive or prestigious at all.
This is such a misinformed and antiquated boomer take. Penn, USC, UVA, Cornell, Michigan, Northwestern, NYU and countless more offer excellent career opportunities post-grad AND are extremely prestigious. Even a notch down schools like UF, UVA, UT Austin, IU, are getting internships and jobs even in this challenging landscape. For crying out loud, please let this go.
Anonymous wrote:An undergrad business degree is the GED of college degrees. The types of courses range so widely from school to school it's not impressive or prestigious at all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:An undergrad business degree is the GED of college degrees. The types of courses range so widely from school to school it's not impressive or prestigious at all.
Business can be like any 30/120 credit major (only 25% of total credits). As a Phi Beta Kappa MBA who loves the liberal arts, I think it's dumb to slam business degrees. At the better schools, the classes exercise many of the same skills as English classes (particularly business communications, marketing, and presentation coursework) and Math classes (Accounting, Finance). Organizational Behavior has a lot in common with Psychology and Sociology. There are also classes like Business Ethics, Business Law, etc. that are rather like Philosophy, Political Science, etc. With good professors at good schools, these are equivalently thought-provoking. That is why the Liberal Arts are suffering from intra-University competition. I think the best way for the Liberal Arts to gain back support is better college career office support AND lower tuition prices so students and parents can afford the income risk/lower starting salaries for many.
Let's keep in mind that a single person lecturing to a physically present crowd in a lecture hall is a medieval invention. How can society really justify $90K/year for this type of education? The Humanities have a risk-adjusted affordability issue.
There was a time decades ago when even Harvard MBAs were mainly for the lazy kids and heirs. It's totally different now. Anti-BBA thinking seems really old-school to me.
At the better schools...at good schools...yah
What about middling schools?
Business and communications are fave majors for athletes.
Anonymous wrote:OP: Does your daughter have strong quantitative skills ?
If yes, then these are the highest ranked schools for Econometrics & Quantitative Economics:
1) U Chicago
2) Northwestern University
3) U Penn
4) Vanderbilt
5) Yale
6) Harvard
7) Duke
8) Columbia
9) Rice
10) Johns Hopkins U.
11) Stanford
12) UC-Berkeley
13) Brown
14) Princeton
Other top programs are at:
Cornell, Dartmouth, Claremont McKenna College, UCLA, USC, WashUStL, Carnegie Mellon U., Emory, U Wisconsin, UNC, Boston College, NYU, U Virginia (econ/stats/data analytics), Georgetown (economics).
Good programs at: U Illinois, Williams College, UC-San Diego, Tufts, U Maryland, U Michigan, U Minnesota, Colorado School of Mines, Swarthmore (econ), Barnard (econ).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unlike others on the thread, DC did a very qualitative Econ degree and got a job very easily this summer. Math matters a ton if you’re going into Quantitative finance or actual economics, but most do not need those skills going into a business career
Same for me, although I was circa 2000![]()
Where is your dc in college? I’m wondering because I think it makes a difference if the college only offers econ (vs quant econ or finance) but it is a well respected college, then a qualitative econ degree won’t hold you back for those sorts of internships and job interviews. But if the college offers finance or quant econ, then a qualitative econ candidate might not fare as well getting the initial interviews.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:An undergrad business degree is the GED of college degrees. The types of courses range so widely from school to school it's not impressive or prestigious at all.
Business can be like any 30/120 credit major (only 25% of total credits). As a Phi Beta Kappa MBA who loves the liberal arts, I think it's dumb to slam business degrees. At the better schools, the classes exercise many of the same skills as English classes (particularly business communications, marketing, and presentation coursework) and Math classes (Accounting, Finance). Organizational Behavior has a lot in common with Psychology and Sociology. There are also classes like Business Ethics, Business Law, etc. that are rather like Philosophy, Political Science, etc. With good professors at good schools, these are equivalently thought-provoking. That is why the Liberal Arts are suffering from intra-University competition. I think the best way for the Liberal Arts to gain back support is better college career office support AND lower tuition prices so students and parents can afford the income risk/lower starting salaries for many.
Let's keep in mind that a single person lecturing to a physically present crowd in a lecture hall is a medieval invention. How can society really justify $90K/year for this type of education? The Humanities have a risk-adjusted affordability issue.
There was a time decades ago when even Harvard MBAs were mainly for the lazy kids and heirs. It's totally different now. Anti-BBA thinking seems really old-school to me.
Anonymous wrote:An undergrad business degree is the GED of college degrees. The types of courses range so widely from school to school it's not impressive or prestigious at all.
Anonymous wrote:Unlike others on the thread, DC did a very qualitative Econ degree and got a job very easily this summer. Math matters a ton if you’re going into Quantitative finance or actual economics, but most do not need those skills going into a business career