Anonymous wrote:Definitely counting on it. Two-fed family. I suppose we would not be destitute without it, but it would be a huge problem.
If things get so bad that FERS and SS cannot pay out, I would think we have bigger problems such as the collapse of our nation.
Anonymous wrote:FERS is fully funded for itself and always has been. (OPM increases the agency contribution piece if it's actuarially necessary.) The increased contribution that RAE and FRAE employees make is to make up for CSRS employees, whose pension has never been fully funded. But there are few CSRS employees left in active service, and the number of pensioners is going down. That's not to say something *couldn't* change, but FERS is not contributing one cent to the federal debt (except, I suppose, obliquely in that the agencies have to make contributions each year which raise their annual budgets).
Anonymous wrote:FERS is fully funded for itself and always has been. (OPM increases the agency contribution piece if it's actuarially necessary.) The increased contribution that RAE and FRAE employees make is to make up for CSRS employees, whose pension has never been fully funded. But there are few CSRS employees left in active service, and the number of pensioners is going down. That's not to say something *couldn't* change, but FERS is not contributing one cent to the federal debt (except, I suppose, obliquely in that the agencies have to make contributions each year which raise their annual budgets).
Anonymous wrote:.Anonymous wrote:An organization 35 trillion in debt is going to have to either cut or pay with less valuable dollars and no inflation adjustment.
I thought the TSP was well funded? Or are we trying to destroy it like SS by raiding its accounts?
.Anonymous wrote:An organization 35 trillion in debt is going to have to either cut or pay with less valuable dollars and no inflation adjustment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not a lawyer here but I am a lifelong fed who is positioned to get a nice FERS pension. I’ve also built a good TSP and our house will be paid off. But of course FERS will be an important consideration as to when I can safely retire. Given all the craziness in politics and the growing federal debt, is there any real concern that Congress would reduce FERS payouts in the future? I know that we pay into the system so I assume there would be legal challenges but I have no clue how successful those challenges might be.
Federal employees have property rights in their vested retirement benefits. The government can't take them away without compensation.
Anonymous wrote:Not a lawyer here but I am a lifelong fed who is positioned to get a nice FERS pension. I’ve also built a good TSP and our house will be paid off. But of course FERS will be an important consideration as to when I can safely retire. Given all the craziness in politics and the growing federal debt, is there any real concern that Congress would reduce FERS payouts in the future? I know that we pay into the system so I assume there would be legal challenges but I have no clue how successful those challenges might be.