Anonymous wrote:Unlimited subs is terrible in college and they should get rid of it. It eliminates resource management both for players and for the coach as a strategy.
Anonymous wrote:If GA diesnt follow suit this change will make cross league play in tournaments impossible unless ECNL or GA clubs choose to play up an age group.
It will also make soccer rankings between leagues near impossible unless some kind of magic league "power rankings" dynamic was added. Unfortunately this would end up just being something everyone fights about.
Regarding playing professionally it doesn't really matter. Acadamies are all about players playing up so calender year vs grade grouping is irrelevant. However, internationally teams are grouped by year. If you want to play against teams in other countries teams will need to be calender year based.
Anonymous wrote:However, internationally teams are grouped by year. If you want to play against teams in other countries teams will need to be calender year based.
Anonymous wrote:If ECNL does this its to show US Soccer (and GA) that they own the youth to college pipeline of players.
If ECNL really wanted to show US Soccer who's boss this should adopt college unlimited subs rules. They'll never do this because it's lower level soccer and would kiill their top clubs ability to dominate the league.
Anonymous wrote:How can ECNL be different than US Youth Soccer and MLS Next?
Anonymous wrote:Would ECNL RL follow this as well or just ECNL?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The bias around the birthday happens no matter where you draw the line. The advantage to moving the line is keeping kids together with their school friends and not having trapped players.
I am obviously the parent of a trapped player, as all the Q1 birth parents just come in and shout and yell about how its a bad idea and we should get over it.
What are the actual advantages?
Trapped in what?
Doesn't it just mean the Q4 player has both school friends and club friends?
(as they all do)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The bias around the birthday happens no matter where you draw the line. The advantage to moving the line is keeping kids together with their school friends and not having trapped players.
I am obviously the parent of a trapped player, as all the Q1 birth parents just come in and shout and yell about how its a bad idea and we should get over it.
What are the actual advantages?
Trapped in what?
Doesn't it just mean the Q4 player has both school friends and club friends?
(as they all do)
Anonymous wrote:The bias around the birthday happens no matter where you draw the line. The advantage to moving the line is keeping kids together with their school friends and not having trapped players.
I am obviously the parent of a trapped player, as all the Q1 birth parents just come in and shout and yell about how its a bad idea and we should get over it.