Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes there should have been food.
However, if it wasn’t on the invite ( which u state it wasn’t) I would have asked the host just to clarify. If the host said no I’d have sent snacks with my kid.
Your kid can’t go three hours without snacks?
After swimming? No. Most people would need something in that time frame. Hopefully the kids were being loud about it so the host realized their mistake. I bet even the birthday child was hungry.
Anonymous wrote:Yes there should have been food.
However, if it wasn’t on the invite ( which u state it wasn’t) I would have asked the host just to clarify. If the host said no I’d have sent snacks with my kid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes there should have been food.
However, if it wasn’t on the invite ( which u state it wasn’t) I would have asked the host just to clarify. If the host said no I’d have sent snacks with my kid.
Your kid can’t go three hours without snacks?
Anonymous wrote:Yes there should have been food.
However, if it wasn’t on the invite ( which u state it wasn’t) I would have asked the host just to clarify. If the host said no I’d have sent snacks with my kid.
Anonymous wrote:No food for kids who have just been swimming for 2 hours? That's bad hosting.
Anonymous wrote:I agree that some sort of lunch food should have been served, but I don't think it's a federal crime that it was not. The parents are either clueless or cheaped out. The kids went hungry for an hour and nobody was harmed. Move along.
Anonymous wrote:I have two kids 11 and 8 and we've been to many birthdays over the years. Majority of time its assumed some form of food will be served, or invitation will specify "snacks and cake" if there isn't going to be pizza or meal. Today my 8yr old DD went to a swim party. The invitation said 10-12:00 would be swimming, and then an hour in the party room afterward. Only cupcakes were served, and I guess the rest of the time was opening presents and playing games in the party room. My kid was starving by the time I picked her up, as were the other girls. They were all begging for parents to stop and get them something to eat. Am I mistaken to have assumed they would be eating during the 12:00-1:00 time frame after swimming for 2 hours?
Anonymous wrote:I think posts like these are helpful for parents who might not know the ins and outs of how to host a party.
You don't have a party that runs through lunchtime and not provide something to eat other than a mass dose of sugar.
If the parent couldn't afford food, then start the party at 1 - 3, or 9:30 to noon.
Anonymous wrote:I think posts like these are helpful for parents who might not know the ins and outs of how to host a party.
You don't have a party that runs through lunchtime and not provide something to eat other than a mass dose of sugar.
If the parent couldn't afford food, then start the party at 1 - 3, or 9:30 to noon.
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s not a big deal. It was not a dinner party.
Anonymous wrote:What is the purpose of the post. So we can all call the party host poor?