Anonymous wrote:How does a 17 year old know that they want to do big law? That's not at all like "everyone else." Especially not at Yale -- Harvard would be a better choice. But they are thinking way too far ahead.
Assuming the cost is the same at those three schools, they should apply where they think is the best fit, take a variety of classes in interesting subjects, decide based on that what to major in (since pre law isn't a major), go to law school (if that's still what they want to do after college -- be open to being exposed to new ideas!) and then after the first year of law school consider what kind of law they want to practice and what work life balance they want.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Steer her as well as you can towards Dartmouth. Small colleges like Claremont Mckenna and Amherst are traps for students who can't get into real universities and struggle with the real world. If she can't learn without a professor spoon feeding her everything, she'll fail in life.
Baloney.
Amherst and Williams have excellent reputations and are law pipelines just one notch under the top ivies.
Claremont...not the same league at all. On par with BC as far as law likelihood.
Another east coaster who knows nothing but spews false information proudly about west coast colleges.
I really hope you're a troll.Anonymous wrote:I don't want my daughter ruining her talent at a no-name college with community-college levels of ambitious students. She should be striving to be around the best and most competitive if that's the type of industry she is looking for.Anonymous wrote:You're underestimating her and/or there's dumbing down of her reasoning going on between her and you and/or between you and this board. Her three ED finalists actually make a lot of sense in some very nuanced ways--and Harvard doesn't fit in that group.Anonymous wrote:... She'd apply to Harvard if she wasn't stubborn and didn't "hate the campus"![]()
Anonymous wrote:You're underestimating her and/or there's dumbing down of her reasoning going on between her and you and/or between you and this board. Her three ED finalists actually make a lot of sense in some very nuanced ways--and Harvard doesn't fit in that group.Anonymous wrote:... She'd apply to Harvard if she wasn't stubborn and didn't "hate the campus"![]()
Anonymous wrote:How does a 17 year old know that they want to do big law? That's not at all like "everyone else." Especially not at Yale -- Harvard would be a better choice. But they are thinking way too far ahead.
Assuming the cost is the same at those three schools, they should apply where they think is the best fit, take a variety of classes in interesting subjects, decide based on that what to major in (since pre law isn't a major), go to law school (if that's still what they want to do after college -- be open to being exposed to new ideas!) and then after the first year of law school consider what kind of law they want to practice and what work life balance they want.
You're underestimating her and/or there's dumbing down of her reasoning going on between her and you and/or between you and this board. Her three ED finalists actually make a lot of sense in some very nuanced ways--and Harvard doesn't fit in that group.Anonymous wrote:... She'd apply to Harvard if she wasn't stubborn and didn't "hate the campus"![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op , none of us know whether this is a good plan for ED without knowing your daughter’s stats and where she goes to school (public, private, geographical area). ED doesn’t help tremendously at any of the schools you listed and all are lottery schools.
To be accepted at Yale, she will need perfect grades and near perfect LSATs. Also highly unlikely for any student.
She's in line with her school's college record keeping system to get into all of these schools. Private prep school, 4.0/1600. National level extracurriculars and teachers' favorite. She'd apply to Harvard if she wasn't stubborn and didn't "hate the campus"![]()
She sounds like a real peach. If she's politically conservative she'll be more comfortable at CMC. Probably easier to excel there than Amherst or Dartmouth as they take a slightly lower tier of student.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op , none of us know whether this is a good plan for ED without knowing your daughter’s stats and where she goes to school (public, private, geographical area). ED doesn’t help tremendously at any of the schools you listed and all are lottery schools.
To be accepted at Yale, she will need perfect grades and near perfect LSATs. Also highly unlikely for any student.
She's in line with her school's college record keeping system to get into all of these schools. Private prep school, 4.0/1600. National level extracurriculars and teachers' favorite. She'd apply to Harvard if she wasn't stubborn and didn't "hate the campus"![]()
Anonymous wrote:Op , none of us know whether this is a good plan for ED without knowing your daughter’s stats and where she goes to school (public, private, geographical area). ED doesn’t help tremendously at any of the schools you listed and all are lottery schools.
To be accepted at Yale, she will need perfect grades and near perfect LSATs. Also highly unlikely for any student.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Steer her as well as you can towards Dartmouth. Small colleges like Claremont Mckenna and Amherst are traps for students who can't get into real universities and struggle with the real world. If she can't learn without a professor spoon feeding her everything, she'll fail in life.
Baloney.
Amherst and Williams have excellent reputations and are law pipelines just one notch under the top ivies.
Claremont...not the same league at all. On par with BC as far as law likelihood.