Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here and I appreciate all the perspectives especially the coaches that are chiming in.
... but there are 6 parents coaching and they are not the top 6 players, so could end up a bench player.
That is craziness! Speaks to a head coach / LL commissioner who has completely lost control.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I watched four games this week of a 9U Little League All Star game. It is unsanctioned but our Division unofficially has an all star tournament for 7U, 8U, and 9U players.
My boys played all stars for our local LL and so we went to watch since our league is hosting the 9U tournament. My local town brought 12 players and the first team they played had 14 players. I felt like the top of the line up was equally matched but wow that bottom of the line up really dragged on especially for the 14 player team. That is 5 extra batters before you get back to the top of the line up. It wasn't as fun to watch because you didn't get to see the best batters and pitchers in the Division square off. My boys played all stars for our local LL and so we went to watch since our league is hosting the 9U tournament.
The 14 player team traditionally has done well in the past years but this year they lost their first two games and were out. I think having continuous batting really hurt them. As a spectator I liked the old rules way better. And I don't think it benefits any player. One of my kids was a starting player and never sat out and the other one was a sub and batted once and got two innings of play in the field. That was enough to keep him feeling involved.
The spectator experience is completely irrelevant!
Of course it is relevant because most spectators are parents. Talking to parents and hearing other conversations, no one likes the new format.
And it is relevant because little league makes so much money on the LL World Series. I think when ratings go down for the little league World Series they will go back to the old way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I watched four games this week of a 9U Little League All Star game. It is unsanctioned but our Division unofficially has an all star tournament for 7U, 8U, and 9U players.
My boys played all stars for our local LL and so we went to watch since our league is hosting the 9U tournament. My local town brought 12 players and the first team they played had 14 players. I felt like the top of the line up was equally matched but wow that bottom of the line up really dragged on especially for the 14 player team. That is 5 extra batters before you get back to the top of the line up. It wasn't as fun to watch because you didn't get to see the best batters and pitchers in the Division square off. My boys played all stars for our local LL and so we went to watch since our league is hosting the 9U tournament.
The 14 player team traditionally has done well in the past years but this year they lost their first two games and were out. I think having continuous batting really hurt them. As a spectator I liked the old rules way better. And I don't think it benefits any player. One of my kids was a starting player and never sat out and the other one was a sub and batted once and got two innings of play in the field. That was enough to keep him feeling involved.
The spectator experience is completely irrelevant!
Anonymous wrote:OP here and I appreciate all the perspectives especially the coaches that are chiming in.
... but there are 6 parents coaching and they are not the top 6 players, so could end up a bench player.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We found it to make a very slanted and daddy ball experience even more so last year. It was just silly.
Same
Anonymous wrote:I will never understand or accept the mentality of a coach who doesn’t empty the bench in a blowout. I get it that they’re volunteers, but I coach too and too me this is as pure a form of evil as I ever encounter in my daily existence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We found it to make a very slanted and daddy ball experience even more so last year. It was just silly.
Same
Anonymous wrote:We found it to make a very slanted and daddy ball experience even more so last year. It was just silly.
Anonymous wrote:I will never understand or accept the mentality of a coach who doesn’t empty the bench in a blowout. I get it that they’re volunteers, but I coach too and too me this is as pure a form of evil as I ever encounter in my daily existence.
Anonymous wrote:I watched four games this week of a 9U Little League All Star game. It is unsanctioned but our Division unofficially has an all star tournament for 7U, 8U, and 9U players.
My boys played all stars for our local LL and so we went to watch since our league is hosting the 9U tournament. My local town brought 12 players and the first team they played had 14 players. I felt like the top of the line up was equally matched but wow that bottom of the line up really dragged on especially for the 14 player team. That is 5 extra batters before you get back to the top of the line up. It wasn't as fun to watch because you didn't get to see the best batters and pitchers in the Division square off. My boys played all stars for our local LL and so we went to watch since our league is hosting the 9U tournament.
The 14 player team traditionally has done well in the past years but this year they lost their first two games and were out. I think having continuous batting really hurt them. As a spectator I liked the old rules way better. And I don't think it benefits any player. One of my kids was a starting player and never sat out and the other one was a sub and batted once and got two innings of play in the field. That was enough to keep him feeling involved.