Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Once again, Youngkin gets it right:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/virginia-electric-vehicles-california-rules-glenn-youngkin-gavin-newsom-82a496a1

I’m very pleased with his mostly moderate, cautious common sense approach to things. Keep bringing it!

WSJ op-ed trash

VA falling behind with RWNJs at the helm.

Ah, our resident LWNJ troll is back. You're the Hogan-basher too, right?

Anonymous wrote:Once again, Youngkin gets it right:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/virginia-electric-vehicles-california-rules-glenn-youngkin-gavin-newsom-82a496a1

I’m very pleased with his mostly moderate, cautious common sense approach to things. Keep bringing it!

Yep. Completely agree. I especially liked this part:

Mr. Youngkin has the public on his side. A December poll found that 57% of Virginians want to repeal the vehicle mandates, compared with 30% who prefer to keep them in place. Ditching the mandates will give consumers a choice of EVs or gas-powered cars, which will help low-income buyers in particular. As for Mr. Newsom, check back in a decade to see where his forced EV march has led the Golden State.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a strong feeling that a Youngkin-Haley Republican ticket would easily trounce Biden-Harris. It would be no contest.

While I would prefer the Democrats to control government, I think the Democrats needs to spend some time to get reacquainted with the American people.

Why? Democrats hate Americans. That’s why they’re trying to fill the country with easily manipulated immigrants who have no prior history here and are utterly dependent on government programs to sustain themselves.

Yeah, immigrants, women, descendanta of slaves, people with high school and post high school education...

Meanwhile Republicans get their base of power from British colonial boundaries that enable a minority of welfare kings, whose lives are paid for by Federal taxes from Democrat states, to control the Federal government.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Once again, Youngkin gets it right:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/virginia-electric-vehicles-california-rules-glenn-youngkin-gavin-newsom-82a496a1

I’m very pleased with his mostly moderate, cautious common sense approach to things. Keep bringing it!

Good for Youngkin.

As an aside, does WSJ not allow you to gift articles for free? I'm not a subscriber.

Then you should pony up and pay for the journalists work.

I subscribe to the NYT and WaPo (and I do gift articles from them), I think that's enough. If the WSJ allows atricle gifting, I think it's common courtesy to do that if sharing a link. I suspect WSJ doesn't do that, however.

You can read WSJ for free if you have a DC Library card. You can google where the portal access is. They require you to use your card to sign in.

Anonymous wrote:Well this is really good news!!!

CA has lost it's minds!!!!!

+100000

Virginia trying to be CALI is the dumbest thing people have tried to mimic lately! SMH. What a joke!

Anonymous wrote:Once again, Youngkin gets it right:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/virginia-electric-vehicles-california-rules-glenn-youngkin-gavin-newsom-82a496a1

I’m very pleased with his mostly moderate, cautious common sense approach to things. Keep bringing it!

Thank you Governor Youngkin. I am sure the Dems will try this again. Wish they would just move to CA.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Great! He isn't as bad as you guys cried about this whole time! In fact I'm pretty happy with him.

One decent policy does not make his great or as bad. He's still terrible. Even a clock strikes 12 twice in a day.

He’s right far more often than not and seems to learn from his missteps, which are largely errors caused by lack of nuance.
A lot of why I like him is not that he’s not trying to reinvent the wheel. But he has stopped a lot of really dumb stuff from happening, which seems to be about the best we can hope for right now in government.

Edit: I like him because he’s NOT trying to reinvent the wheel.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Once again, Youngkin gets it right:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/virginia-electric-vehicles-california-rules-glenn-youngkin-gavin-newsom-82a496a1

I’m very pleased with his mostly moderate, cautious common sense approach to things. Keep bringing it!

Good for Youngkin.

As an aside, does WSJ not allow you to gift articles for free? I'm not a subscriber.

Then you should pony up and pay for the journalists work.

I subscribe to the NYT and WaPo (and I do gift articles from them), I think that's enough. If the WSJ allows atricle gifting, I think it's common courtesy to do that if sharing a link. I suspect WSJ doesn't do that, however.

I’m not sure what’s going on with WSJ because they used to allow unlimited gifting.
They do offer some super cheap deals on subscriptions though.

Also you probably do not need NYT and WaPo. I’d pick one of those and then subscribe to WSJ to get the full spectrum.

Yeah, you're probably right. But I'm from NY and live in the DC area, so I like to keep up with both regions. Overall, I'd say the NYT is the better option.

Agree NYT is the better option. And I’m in DC too.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Great! He isn't as bad as you guys cried about this whole time! In fact I'm pretty happy with him.

One decent policy does not make his great or as bad. He's still terrible. Even a clock strikes 12 twice in a day.

He’s right far more often than not and seems to learn from his missteps, which are largely errors caused by lack of nuance.
A lot of why I like him is not that he’s not trying to reinvent the wheel. But he has stopped a lot of really dumb stuff from happening, which seems to be about the best we can hope for right now in government.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Once again, Youngkin gets it right:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/virginia-electric-vehicles-california-rules-glenn-youngkin-gavin-newsom-82a496a1

I’m very pleased with his mostly moderate, cautious common sense approach to things. Keep bringing it!

Good for Youngkin.

As an aside, does WSJ not allow you to gift articles for free? I'm not a subscriber.

Then you should pony up and pay for the journalists work.

I subscribe to the NYT and WaPo (and I do gift articles from them), I think that's enough. If the WSJ allows atricle gifting, I think it's common courtesy to do that if sharing a link. I suspect WSJ doesn't do that, however.

I’m not sure what’s going on with WSJ because they used to allow unlimited gifting.
They do offer some super cheap deals on subscriptions though.

Also you probably do not need NYT and WaPo. I’d pick one of those and then subscribe to WSJ to get the full spectrum.

Yeah, you're probably right. But I'm from NY and live in the DC area, so I like to keep up with both regions. Overall, I'd say the NYT is the better option.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Once again, Youngkin gets it right:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/virginia-electric-vehicles-california-rules-glenn-youngkin-gavin-newsom-82a496a1

I’m very pleased with his mostly moderate, cautious common sense approach to things. Keep bringing it!

Good for Youngkin.

As an aside, does WSJ not allow you to gift articles for free? I'm not a subscriber.

Then you should pony up and pay for the journalists work.

I subscribe to the NYT and WaPo (and I do gift articles from them), I think that's enough. If the WSJ allows atricle gifting, I think it's common courtesy to do that if sharing a link. I suspect WSJ doesn't do that, however.

I’m not sure what’s going on with WSJ because they used to allow unlimited gifting.
They do offer some super cheap deals on subscriptions though.

Also you probably do not need NYT and WaPo. I’d pick one of those and then subscribe to WSJ to get the full spectrum.

Anonymous wrote:Great! He isn't as bad as you guys cried about this whole time! In fact I'm pretty happy with him.

One decent policy does not make his great or as bad. He's still terrible. Even a clock strikes 12 twice in a day.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Once again, Youngkin gets it right:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/virginia-electric-vehicles-california-rules-glenn-youngkin-gavin-newsom-82a496a1

I’m very pleased with his mostly moderate, cautious common sense approach to things. Keep bringing it!

Good for Youngkin.

As an aside, does WSJ not allow you to gift articles for free? I'm not a subscriber.

Then you should pony up and pay for the journalists work.

I subscribe to the NYT and WaPo (and I do gift articles from them), I think that's enough. If the WSJ allows atricle gifting, I think it's common courtesy to do that if sharing a link. I suspect WSJ doesn't do that, however.

Anonymous wrote:He got it right on another front too.

WTH is our Pentagon doing buying Chinese-made solar panels for the roof???????
Has Secretary Austin ever heard about the Trojan Horse?

Did he bring manufacturing to Virginia, or is he just turning into a fox news talking head?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Once again, Youngkin gets it right:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/virginia-electric-vehicles-california-rules-glenn-youngkin-gavin-newsom-82a496a1

I’m very pleased with his mostly moderate, cautious common sense approach to things. Keep bringing it!

Good for Youngkin.

As an aside, does WSJ not allow you to gift articles for free? I'm not a subscriber.

Then you should pony up and pay for the journalists work.